Skip to main content
  • SBD - Nike Air Max 270 React White Black CT1264 - nike y nk bucket core - 101 Release Date
  • Air Look Jordan 10 X Dark Shadow - SBD - 108 Release Date - Air Look Jordan 1 Grey Fog Stage Haze 555088
  • NW Maroon - Marcus Jordan best Is Releasing A New Air Jordan best Xx3 Exclusively Through Trophy Room , Air Jordan best 6 (VI) Original - IetpShops - OG Maroons Off Obscure
  • Sorte ultimate-handser til damer fra Nike Training
  • 101 Release Date - paul rodriguez nike sb air jordan Pinksicle - Air Jordan Pinksicle 1 Mid Invert Split Black White DR0501 , SBD
  • nike air jordan 1 mid unite totale white sneaker review
  • adidas yeezy boost 350 turtle dove
  • jordan kids shoes jordan 1 retro high white university blue black
  • adidas yeezy boost 350 v2 salt
  • air jordan 1 retro high og hyper royal
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Commentary: Why are we reliving issues of 1964 in 2004?

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
  • Devel

With a little help from mainstream, mass media, you can fool some of the people some of the time

We felt that it was important to submit this article in order to debunk the half-truths and lies published in an article written by Rochester City Council persons Lois and Ben (See their Oct 20 editorial below).



With regard to police / community relations in Rochester, we vehemently object to the disingenuous, distorted, make-believe view and perspective espoused by Rochester City Council President Lois Giess and Chairperson of the City Council’s Finance & Public Safety Committee Benjamin Douglas.

We are not aware of the specifics in Giess’s and Douglas’s "community" relative to citizens’ relations with police, but as it relates to the "hood," (just as Minister Malcolm X warned prior to the local uprising and explosion of 1964) we are still at a point (40 years later) at which --- with the exception of a relatively small number of officers who have made it their business to get to know the people, and always attempt to treat them justly and fairly --- police are despised by many, especially among the youth. And as Minister Malcolm also warned 40 years ago --- we are at a point at which it is not necessary to incite or "inflame racial animosity." The centuries-old issue and problem has a fuse of its own, and is potentially self-igniting.

We have thoughtfully and thoroughly examined, and studied Councilwoman Lois’s and Councilman Ben’s editorial, but cannot find any explanation or rationale that clarifies how utilizing a police vehicle to literally herd Black people, as if they are cattle, is any different than tactics employed against Black people in apartheid South Africa. We are also convinced that any fool would reject their fundamentally flawed notion that: "Like bullets, words can hurt." Surely they are aware that unlike words, bullets can and do kill, especially Black people (more so than anyone else) throughout the U.S. of A. This has always been the case --- just as it was in apartheid South Africa.

Certain parts of the Councilman’s and Councilwoman’s editorial are just plain ludicrous. For example, how can they possibly talk about treating "all citizens with dignity and respect," when police tactics are used against some citizens that are comparable to the manner in which ranchers deal with their cows and horses?

As it relates to their assertion that "for more than a decade Chief Duffy has worked successfully to implement community policing" --- this is a half-truth at best. Just because someone works at something --- doesn’t automatically make him or her successful. For example, educators in Rochester have worked for many decades in attempts to improve academic success for the majority of our students --- yet academic failure is more widespread than ever! The same is basically true regarding the issue of so-called community policing. A statement made by Chief Duffy during a Community Forum at the Downtown Presbyterian Church on October 1, 2004 is clearly indicative of this fact. The Chief is quoted as having said: "I am a huge foot-patrol advocate. I think foot patrols helps to personalize policing. It helps officers get to know people. A big problem today is that we [police] are so 911-driven. Officers answer 440,000 (911) calls a year. During the ‘60’s, 70’s and 80’s --- it was probably half of that. I think officers spend too much time in cars, (going from call to call) as opposed to proactive policing. We have 700 sworn officers right now. I don’t think the City can afford a big increase. There is a need to look at systems changes." Thus, regardless of how hard people may be working, economic circumstances and the lack of political will are clearly dictating that we are moving farther away, as opposed to closer to realization of authentic community policing. The same holds true relative to so-called steps that have been "taken to make the [police] department reflect its community." Regardless of the "steps" that have been taken --- the Rochester Police Department is barely more reflective of the overall Rochester Community than it was 40 years ago.

We also take serious issue with the statement that "no one in Rochester has worked harder on issues of racism than Bill Johnson." Many of us have worked as hard or harder than Johnson, period! But the most critical point is that (regardless of how hard we have worked) just as in the case of progress, or the lack thereof regarding improved academic achievement and community policing --- institutional racism, which of course is dependent upon individual racism (both of which are more sophisticated than ever before), are as entrenched, rampant, and pervasive as they were 40 years ago.

With regard to the Rochester Police Department and the so-called "Civilian Review Board" --- this represents another idea that many of us worked for years to have implemented --- only to end up with a toothless, paper tiger. Although the so-called Civilian Review Panels can "invite police officers to answer questions" --- officials such as Ronald Evangelista (President of the Locust Club, or police union) can and do issue responses to such invitations, which (for all practical intents and purposes), translate into ‘go to hell.’ And, although the "panels hear testimony and make findings and recommendations to the police chief about any need for discipline" --- the chief is under absolutely no obligation to accept any findings or recommendations from the so-called Civilian Review Board. We repeat, the Board is a totally toothless, paper tiger! This is why some of us had fought for an independent civilian review board with subpoena powers.

Again, we vehemently dispute the allegation that relative to police and community relations, "it’s been steady progress," especially where the Black Community is concerned. In fact, when we closely examine overall conditions and relations, we must ask, why are we reliving issues of 1964 in 2004?

So, Lois and Ben can fool themselves, and try to fool others regarding the existence of "trust," but some of us know better. Incidentally, to state that "trust can be easily shattered," represents a contradiction of ideas, especially by way of a Councilman’s words vis-a-vis police bullets --- such as those that have claimed the lives of a number of Black men in this community during the same "past decade" that Lois and Ben want to pretend produced so much change and progress.

In the final analysis, there are many of us within the progressive, grassroots, Black Community (the "hood") who are just plain overjoyed by the fact that (unlike many of our so-called representatives), Councilman McFadden has decided not to be tongue-in-cheekish. If telling the raw truth about what’s really going on is considered by upholders of the status quo as being "wild, headline-grabbing, accusations that shake trust and impede [so-called] progress" --- then so be it! But when it comes to Councilman McFadden, our position is hands off! 

Penned by Howard J. Eagle (on behalf of those who support this position).


___________________________________________________________________________________

Democrat and Chronicle

Police force is on guard against racism

(October 20, 2004) — South District Councilman Adam McFadden's comparison of police response to an incident at a nightclub as "apartheid'' (story, Oct. 8; editorial, Oct. 11) is not only patently unfair but also serves to further inflame racial animosity in our community. Like bullets, words can hurt and must be used with caution and sensitivity.

We are not naïve enough to believe that racism is gone, legislated out of existence or driven away by a workshop. For some people, racism is found in a remark; for others, it is expressed in behavior. When it comes to police work, there is special significance because our Police Department's job involves law enforcement, often in confrontational situations.

Because the community has demanded it, and because it is the right thing to do, Rochester has been at the forefront of police training. For more than a decade, Mayor Bill Johnson and the City Council have worked closely with the Rochester Police Department to ensure that all citizens are treated with dignity and respect. Training for new recruits has been reviewed and re-engineered. The city has hired psychologists to help screen people applying to become officers and to weed out those who shouldn't carry a gun to work. During these same years, Chief Bob Duffy has worked successfully to implement community policing and taken steps to make the department reflect its community.

No one in Rochester has worked harder on issues of racism than Bill Johnson, for 20 years as executive director of the Urban League of Rochester and for the past decade as Rochester's mayor, to confront racial division and help this community work together. There is no way that he would permit the pattern of behavior that Mr. McFadden has alleged.

Twelve years ago, City Council pioneered a new process for handling allegations of police misconduct. Citizens interested in volunteering their time are trained by the nonprofit Center for Dispute Settlement to serve on the Civilian Review Board. When citizens file allegations of police misconduct, the panels hear testimony, can invite police officials to answer questions and make findings and recommendations to the police chief about any need for discipline.

It's been steady progress. But a lot of this progress is based on trust that can be easily shattered. Responsible leadership does not make wild, headline-grabbing accusations that shake that trust and impede that progress.

Giess is City Council president; Douglas chairs the council's Finance & Public Safety Committee.

  • Facebook logo
  • Google logo
  • identi.ca logo
  • Twitter logo
  • Digg logo
  • del.icio.us logo
  • Reddit logo
  • StumbleUpon logo
  • Yahoo logo
  • Log in or register to post comments

Search form

Local News

Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude
Hats off to Kropotkin!!
Agreement between the City of Rochester and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2016 - 2019
Facebook Posts Lead to Federal Rioting Charges for Justice for Daniel Prude Protester

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded