Skip to main content
  • adidas fashion show 2008 episodes free , Adidas x Ø27 ZX 8000
  • 160 - 2020 Air Jordan 11s Retro Low Concord Bred Men Sneakers AV2187 - personal AIR Jordans for Air Jordan
  • Where To Buy , Nike Air Max 90 Leather LTHR Brigade Blue Armony Navy Sneakers Shoes 768887-401 , 600 - IetpShops , DO6485 , Nike Dunk Low GS Pink Velvet
  • Pricing, nike free 5.0 size 8.5 blue white shoes black, SBD, Nike Air Zoom GT Cut Colorways , Release Dates
  • CD0461-016 Air Jordan 1 High OG Satin Black Toe 2019 For Sale
  • saquon barkley nike air trainer iii DA5403 200 release date
  • Nike KD 15 Aunt Pearl Release Date
  • jordan kids shoes jordan 1 retro high white university blue black
  • Nike SB Dunk high premium doom sneaker talk
  • Air Jordan 4 GS Where The Wild Things Are DH0572 264 Release Date Price 4
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Progressives In Action Discuss Pre-emptive Prosecution

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
  • Devel


#file_7#

Steve Downs of Project SALAM, Support And Legal Advocacy for Muslims, was the featured speaker at a meeting of Progressives In Action at the Grapevine Restaurant on April 12. The subject of the presentation was pre-emptive prosecution in America. Much, but not all of it is aimed at Muslims and Arabs. Downs stood in front of three large boards displaying the names of people who have been pre-emptively prosecuted. The three boards displayed 150 names. There actually over 400 people incarcerated but the room was not large enough to accommodate all of the displays.

#file_8#

Pre-emptive prosecution began supposedly as a response to the September 11, 2001 attacks, however hints of it were mentioned in the 1997 neocon manifesto Project For A New American Century. The idea of pre-emptive prosecution was the brainchild of former Vice President Dick Cheney, Attorney and “torture memo” author John Yoo, and Admiral John Poindexter, who lost his job as President Reagan's National Security Advisor over his involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. Cheney believed that “if there was a one percent chance that someone might commit an act of terror then they must be prosecuted with 100% effort.” This went against the US Constitution which requires that authorities have probable cause before investigating someone, and that no one could be arrested unless they committed a crime. So Cheney decided that he had to change the Constitution, in secret if necessary.

Poindexter contrived a program he called Total Information Awareness which would link hundreds of private databases of personal information. The information would be subjected to secret mathematical algorithms for “deviation” from “normal” behaviors. The idea was presented to Congress, and Congress rejected it. In a move that Downs described as “insane,” Cheney set out to secretly change the Constitution. The White House had Attorney John Yoo write a memo claiming that “during war the President can do whatever he wants.” Congress went along, so long as it was limited to activities involving terrorism. But it didn't spell out exactly what Terrorism was. Peace, Environmental, Animal Rights and Palestinian Activists were caught up in the net. Muslim charities were shut down. Simply donating money to a charity that did humanitarian work in an area controlled by a political party the US didn't like, like Hamas in Palestine, was enough to trigger a “terrorism” prosecution. The system also allowed Government prosecutors to “cherry pick” information in a manner to insure incrimination and conviction. It had no mandate to include what lawyers refer to as “exculpatory evidence” which is evidence that could show that the accused is not guilty. Our legal system requires that exculpatory evidence be turned over to the court. The whole outcome designed by this system is to incarcerate people for crimes they might commit, rather than crimes they committed.

Ten years later we are now feeling the ramifications of these policies. People caught up in the net of prosecutions are interned in special “Communication Management Units” officially called CMU's but an old Soviet acronym GULAG is equally descriptive. These maximum security facilities were originally designed for holding organized crime bosses, to prevent them from operating their empires from within prison. Phone calls are limited to fifteen minutes a week. Visitation is only allowed through a bulletproof glass window and conversation over a telephone is monitored. Inmates are often put in solitary confinement for long periods of time, deprived of food, water and sleep. The goal is to cause insanity preventing the accused from mounting a coherent legal defense. The only way out is to plead guilty. This is, of course, torture. The Geneva Convention defines solitary confinement of more than 30 days as torture. But we don't know who is being subjected to it. There is no communication. No journalist has ever been inside one. It is a dangerous philosophy to imprison people based on a perceived propensity to commit crimes, rather than on the actual commission of them. Comparisons to the film Minority Report can't help but be made but there are differences. In Minority Report suspects were identified through the visions of specially gifted human prognosticators. The crime involved was limited to murder. Cheney's vision uses computers performing analysis on data that might not even be correct. The “crime” could be something as minor as loaning money to someone with the “wrong” friends. The reality in this case is much more dangerous than Hollywood's version.


One prominent name on the list was that of Bradley Manning, the US soldier who allegedly gave secret information to Wikileaks. His rights are different as he is a member of the military, but the Geneva Convention rules still apply. The rules are continually being changed to fit the US version of the case. Manning and his defenders are continually harassed.

The United States is clearly heading down a slippery slope toward totalitarianism. What was true about our legal system only 10 years ago is no longer true now. It has become much more like that of the old Soviet Union. Former Senator Russ Finegold (D-Wisconsin) recognized this and introduced the Justice Act. The Justice Act would fix the Patriot Act, by requiring that a crime actually be committed before anyone could be prosecuted, and that exculpatory evidence must be presented and weighed. Unfortunately Finegold lost his Senate seat to a Tea Party Republican in 2010 but the Justice Act is still in the Senate. Tell your Senator to support it.


The American Public has been conditioned to accept these transgressions under the guise of “It doesn't affect me because I'm not a Muslim.” But it affects more than just Muslims. The CMU-like facilities are full of persons accused (not convicted) of immigration violations. People are “disappeared” without a trace. This is about demonizing groups to maintain power. “I think public opinion turned when they started going after the peace activists” said Downs, referring to organizers and protesters who were rounded up in Minnesota at the time of the 2008 Republican Convention. When asked if he had been harassed by the FBI, Downs responded “I have not been harassed….they love me. But I assume my phone has been tapped.”


Professor James Swarts of SUNY Geneseo co-opted Pastor Niemoller's poem about the rise of the Nazis to todays reality.

First they came for the Muslims

but I did not speak out because I wasn't a Muslim

Then they came for the Immigrants

but I did not speak out because I was a US citizen

Then they came for the peace activists

but I did not speak out

Then they came for me

and there was no one left to speak out


Anti-fascism / Fascism
Civil Liberties / Human Rights
Police and Jails
Surveillance / Privacy
  • Facebook logo
  • Google logo
  • identi.ca logo
  • Twitter logo
  • Digg logo
  • del.icio.us logo
  • Reddit logo
  • StumbleUpon logo
  • Yahoo logo
  • Log in or register to post comments

Search form

Local News

Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude
Hats off to Kropotkin!!
Agreement between the City of Rochester and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2016 - 2019
Facebook Posts Lead to Federal Rioting Charges for Justice for Daniel Prude Protester

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded