A Canadian Soldier's Life Held in Contempt - The Verdict

A Canadian Soldier's Life Held in Contempt - The Verdict <!--break--> When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own. = Highwater = ---- The Verdict The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation out of their "Exploitation" Unit. Disclosed by a current serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if he wanted it back, he would have to make costly "legal" efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by "Law". The Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending Winnipeg citizenry, in relationship to the, National problem of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through the corporate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for instituting the terrorist crimes of 9/11. Obstructing Justice by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court motion to our Court system to consider contacting another office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge, publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion. Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case, yet to be reported on by our national press, is turning out to be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know, this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for free discussions on these matters. All I want is to challenge the man. Merci. P.S. Maybe Harper won't be so bad... Doh! --- A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt The way I see it, is that I am completely documented correct on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I have my own theories on why our media and police services have failed our Soldiers by refusing to support my cause directly thus far, but I am far without hope. I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide support through our police services and the Court of Queen’s Bench, is much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leadership, than a general, across the board support of furthering Bush’s war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the 911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings, done for public recognition, I’m told, continue to swell to near epic proportions. Intelligence officers the world over most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who may support the fight for Bush rule in our police services, can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I’m walking a groove most all of the time. The affidavit that starts “1. National Security Issues” was submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance from the Court. The additional paper “Stand Together or Don’t”, was an added part of the same affidavit. The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two motions, “Order of Production” and “for the Crown to Stay Proceedings”. Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were submitted in each respect. ---- http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3 "Holy Christ.." --- http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban." This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot. http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3 http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3 These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr. bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call unheard from. -------- AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba MAKE OATH AND SAY: 1. Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl in February 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June 19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01] 2. On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron. ["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years. CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just society. 3. RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls 21 September 2001 17:41 The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden in an American court. The US Government said there would be no negotiations. 4. [This following document was the official damning account] Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States 4 October 2001 http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp [This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's] "This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law." The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See? 5. Investigating the Investigation http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816 After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request." ...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates following" as well. 6. ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks... `You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations' 7. October 9 2001 - The Times of India "While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S. authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have confirmed that India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link." 8. No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs. Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the Internet. 9. former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill "the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia." 10. Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow "Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows." 11. Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty." 12. www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14 " [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also included information relating to their financial activities. " 13. The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron. From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz " I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas." 14. From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New York), 25 May 2002: "We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and children to kill them." 15. Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting" by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc. Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village." 16. US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm "American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent. And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger." The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that too? 17. Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml 18. http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm "Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran." 19. http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872 CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!" (Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg) 20. Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated" [this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive] This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news report on it. 21. INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation? SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive. INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it. SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank. "Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic alterations." [thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically measurable extremely serious health concern issue..] 22. Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable." Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter." 23. The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order." (See original at http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf) 24. U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies' "Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal. He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint." 25. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained." 26. http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the White House's pre-war position. 27. ``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.'' 28. Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which of them had scored Company C's first kill. 29. It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted. 30. http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970 http://wallofhate.com Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die "It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to death." "Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed." 31. US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's northwest. [destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave, exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.] 32. The Bush Administration In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq." [ And...] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban." This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot. 33. Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441. HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..." With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped 19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back. 34. Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story. It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers. Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the heating by high explosives. Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani" The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion. ..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit. The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by: - Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc - Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction - and the American Free Press newspaper 35. "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..." Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee 36. The Washington Post, 23 September 2001. At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies. Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were reported as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been "fully implemented" 38. "Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II 39. On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander" ---------------- When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own. =Helen & Harry Highwater= --- HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE! Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately! Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit! Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!! Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these continuing documented crimes!!! 50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!! Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's Premier!!!!! SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND! Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can. Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness as pirates of our human will. The will to be free. The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!! I AM INNOCENT. The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense without any consideration offered to OUR COURT! HELP!!! --- Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it operates through professional Barred representations. [I am eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the Court in these following areas. 1. National Security Issues I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our national security services are obligated to practice under, to insure our national security matters are being truly defended in my respect. No change in summation of my character was altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows, instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner, (who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's "mastermind" "ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his friends in the ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take a stand on this issue, [if he even received said reports] on behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere, in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg ("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly reported repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely" report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff' Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad, with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. "We just wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war going. Left continuing unattended without national discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven, perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international press release acknowledging briefly our failures to communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada could go through open line discussions on these very serious matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor, defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to your leader. 2. Local Police Issues As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the previous motions, through considering the charge that was brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal materials. They have included images to demonize me that they must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions. Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on, something seriously needs to be done in how things there are run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal fears officers have of the information universe; for to acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the score going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by "freedom fighting" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4) with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but not the "Free Press" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the "illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to see which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal conduct would be required before an internet provider, server, or site owner could be recommended for censorship. Not this, twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful. To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a downloadable database updated by the work of one or two officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic - classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the country. This action is good to take despite my personal innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are completely impossible to designate content/control, but as such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user, server, or internet service provider could be warned of material almost in their possession as expression is classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on. I'm confident such Police planning with open for public appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely profitable exploitation units across the continent almost completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that? 3. Constitutional Challenges This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals. Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000 dollars in a single case where the business owner of said stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense! No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a small sample is only offered. [The professional naked people person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely available image that you couldn't see until you already had it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian, in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be sexually deviant and require professional counseling. The law enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge. And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally records and total sales figures on cases under similar circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence gathering capabilities.] While maybe supporting public discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so who's talk radio station is it anyway? 4. The Crown's Crown I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society. It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another, that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a true accounting by good police work completed already. The fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus far, absent in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an unjust and blind totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my character will never change the official FBI's conclusions arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on 9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest. For whatever reason, my case documents a corporate news agenda of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this... I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal Justice always. Just ask US. Your Friend, John W. ----------------- I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive an image until it is at the very least, already in one's possession, says enough by itself. But most importantly, the Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming, but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of my world in which I politically work to improve God's World through indivisibly principled reason. Feel free to do with this as you will. --------------- THE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE NOTICE OF MOTION For an Order of Production BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and JOHNNY WIZARD Accused. This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice." R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to disclose all relevant information." In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top secret intelligence officer this world over. Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar" "The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian jurisprudence.] Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds any legitimacy. It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in relative context to the personal life of the accused. R. v. Sharpe "Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds it." So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding what the threat actually is. By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared reality. My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad. [University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca] http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord. The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]] I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn texts. It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000 missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg. I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our behalf. By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an undue hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points. Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, I have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend. I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening? I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society. I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's Standing Sharpe decision. The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]] I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture. I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems, and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering. I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding general media managements. I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using such services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.] I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's own relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising the faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals, as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock. If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man - Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so secret any longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

<p>A Canadian Soldier's Life Held in Contempt - The Verdict</p> <!--break--><p> When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.</p> <p>= Highwater =</p> <p> ----</p> <p> The Verdict</p> <p>The Winnipeg Police Department is running a fencing operation<br /> out of their "Exploitation" Unit. Disclosed by a current<br /> serving officer in the Unit during the preliminary. In one<br /> case used as an example, a law abiding Winnipeg business owner<br /> had 50,000 dollars worth of business equipment stolen, and if<br /> he wanted it back, he would have to make costly "legal"<br /> efforts through a corrupted Justice system in Winnipeg that<br /> holds Canadian Soldiers in complete contempt by "Law". The<br /> Crown has not only refusing to co-operate with defending<br /> Winnipeg citizenry, in relationship to the, National problem<br /> of fencing through bad lawed Police action operations, and the<br /> lotteries [information forwarded in part by the elected<br /> Premier of our Province], but also, in respect to our<br /> sacrificing soldiers. Soldiers who Canada now knows without<br /> shadow of doubt, are being maliciously propagandized through<br /> the corporate mouth pieces of the most heinous war criminal of<br /> history, the ungodly enemy of Creation responsible for<br /> instituting the terrorist crimes of 9/11. Obstructing Justice<br /> by aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of first degree<br /> mass murder in New York City is suppose to be a serious<br /> offence in Canada. So, as treasonous to Canadian Liberty, the<br /> Crown in my case is refusing to have the police chief, or<br /> other Crowns look into this matter. [I suggested by my Court<br /> motion to our Court system to consider contacting another<br /> office from a different province perhaps.] While the Judge,<br /> publicly for the Winnipeg record, agreed to side with the<br /> Crown instead, without stating the whys - that Justice for<br /> Canada would not be served under his rule on my suggestion.<br /> Just put a soldier in prison if they should dare stand up in<br /> defense with their lives for Canada is what this unjust case,<br /> yet to be reported on by our national press, is turning out to<br /> be actually. I would ask you once again, to please make some<br /> effort to get on local Winnipeg Radio, or Coast to Coast to<br /> plead for some defense on this matter of morality. You know,<br /> this Freedom thing does involve you too. So, George Norrie<br /> and the rest of you lot, listen, I think you've made some<br /> horrible judgment calls, and I'm asking you now, to live up<br /> to your responsibilities to my America, and invite me on for<br /> free discussions on these matters.</p> <p>All I want is to challenge the man. </p> <p>Merci.</p> <p>P.S. Maybe Harper won't be so bad... Doh!</p> <p>--- </p> <p> A Soldier's Life Held in Contempt </p> <p>The way I see it, is that I am completely documented correct<br /> on who was responsible for the terrorist crimes of 9/11. I<br /> have my own theories on why our media and police services have<br /> failed our Soldiers by refusing to support my cause directly<br /> thus far, but I am far without hope.</p> <p>I believe the failures of me gaining direct wide support<br /> through our police services and the Court of Queen’s Bench, is<br /> much more so for fear of uncertainty, and lack of leadership,<br /> than a general, across the board support of furthering Bush’s<br /> war crime sprees by going still silent while Canadian soldiers<br /> are left forsaken. I speak out publicly often regarding the<br /> 911 evidence in America, and email campaigns of my writings,<br /> done for public recognition, I’m told, continue to swell to<br /> near epic proportions. Intelligence officers the world over<br /> most certainly know of my position on this matter. Those who<br /> may support the fight for Bush rule in our police services,<br /> can mostly only do so, risking in dishonorable blind personal<br /> fear of the great unknown I figure. And, crazy as this may<br /> sound, I believe there is a spooky cool God, for I’m walking a<br /> groove most all of the time.</p> <p>The affidavit that starts “1. National Security Issues” was<br /> submitted in conjunction with my motion to request assistance<br /> from the Court. The additional paper “Stand Together or<br /> Don’t”, was an added part of the same affidavit.</p> <p>The affidavit with 38 positions was submitted with the two<br /> motions, “Order of Production” and “for the Crown to Stay<br /> Proceedings”. Duplicate copies of the same affidavit were<br /> submitted in each respect.</p> <p>----</p> <p><a href="http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3">http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3</a> </p> <p>"Holy Christ.."</p> <p>---</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html</a></p> <p>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted<br /> Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.<br /> 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."</p> <p>This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through<br /> prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the<br /> Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to<br /> persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only<br /> needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence<br /> to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a<br /> result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not<br /> follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab<br /> to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret<br /> plot.</p> <p><a href="http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3">http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p><a href="http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3">http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p>These are the motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny<br /> Wizard's defense in Winnipeg. A man arrested for threatening the<br /> continuing existence of the lawless demon anti-Christ, Our Mr.<br /> bush Jnr. The demon nazi who murdered thousands in New York<br /> City as God's enemy. I, beg and plead my case to ALL that<br /> will listen. The tyrannies of suffering on our God happen<br /> when good people go silent in the face of evil. Please do not<br /> forsake all that is good within yourself, by leaving my call<br /> unheard from.</p> <p>--------</p> <p>AFFIDAVIT</p> <p>AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD</p> <p>I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba<br /> MAKE OATH AND SAY:</p> <p>1.</p> <p>Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire<br /> transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns<br /> after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the<br /> FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street<br /> Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the<br /> wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later<br /> convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl<br /> in February 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal<br /> authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than<br /> $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to<br /> accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta."<br /> [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also reports the $100,000 transfer,<br /> and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN,<br /> 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order<br /> must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and<br /> others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money<br /> ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June<br /> 19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]</p> <p>2.</p> <p>On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he<br /> had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy<br /> documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from<br /> Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade<br /> Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but<br /> providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby<br /> guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads<br /> innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime<br /> serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for<br /> a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.<br /> ["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any<br /> offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim<br /> fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had<br /> offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly<br /> during the Clinton years.</p> <p>CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do<br /> any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf<br /> of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just<br /> society.</p> <p>3.</p> <p>RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls<br /> 21 September 2001 17:41</p> <p>The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's<br /> ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible<br /> for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of<br /> State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to<br /> try bin Laden in an American court.</p> <p>The US Government said there would be no negotiations.</p> <p>4.</p> <p>[This following document was the official damning account]</p> <p>Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States<br /> 4 October 2001<br /> <a href="http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp">http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp</a></p> <p>[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]</p> <p>"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case<br /> against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law."</p> <p>The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?</p> <p>5.</p> <p>Investigating the Investigation<br /> <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816">http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816</a></p> <p>After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked<br /> Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to<br /> investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly<br /> contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then<br /> on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast<br /> meetings repeated the request."</p> <p>...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24<br /> and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates<br /> following" as well.</p> <p>6.</p> <p>ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations<br /> <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html">http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021...</a></p> <p>Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop<br /> investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama<br /> bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks...</p> <p>`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'</p> <p>7.</p> <p>October 9 2001 - The Times of India</p> <p>"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed<br /> that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen<br /> Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on<br /> Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed<br /> here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the<br /> "evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the<br /> suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S.<br /> authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that<br /> $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from<br /> Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of<br /> General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have<br /> confirmed that India contributed significantly to establishing<br /> the link between the money transfer and the role played by the<br /> dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they<br /> said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone<br /> number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link."</p> <p>8.</p> <p>No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none.<br /> [So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential<br /> directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in<br /> 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink<br /> of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush<br /> refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to report on that<br /> fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.<br /> Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every<br /> building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he<br /> had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the<br /> ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all<br /> fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close<br /> to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial<br /> hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in<br /> proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully<br /> shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911<br /> either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and<br /> CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the<br /> Internet.</p> <p>9.</p> <p>former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill </p> <p>"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were<br /> U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi<br /> Arabia."</p> <p>10.</p> <p>Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow</p> <p>"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to<br /> stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert<br /> Wright if he tells us what he knows."</p> <p>11.</p> <p>Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of<br /> complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know<br /> he's guilty."</p> <p>12. </p> <p><a href="http://www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14">www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14</a></p> <p>" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that<br /> the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to<br /> use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also included<br /> information relating to their financial activities. "</p> <p>13.</p> <p>The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can<br /> not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive<br /> on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest<br /> corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.</p> <p>From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz</p> <p>" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney<br /> Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as<br /> to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and<br /> Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the<br /> United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I<br /> met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the<br /> Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit<br /> in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know<br /> about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September<br /> 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration<br /> settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari<br /> at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft<br /> v Bridas."</p> <p>14.</p> <p>From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New<br /> York), 25 May 2002:</p> <p>"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army<br /> Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th<br /> Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there,<br /> they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there<br /> were women and children to kill them."</p> <p>15.</p> <p>Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of<br /> Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"</p> <p>by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.<br /> Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall<br /> Whittemore School of Business &amp; Economics University of New Hampshire</p> <p>When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming<br /> village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on<br /> October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon<br /> official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted<br /> them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1<br /> When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I<br /> cannot deal with that particular village."</p> <p>16.</p> <p>US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS<br /> <a href="http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm">http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm</a></p> <p>"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi<br /> civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent.</p> <p>And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line<br /> coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist<br /> Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when<br /> it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just<br /> pulled the trigger."</p> <p>The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction,<br /> however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting<br /> for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that<br /> only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and<br /> false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant<br /> Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s children. Now,<br /> what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that<br /> too?</p> <p>17.</p> <p>Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for</p> <p><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml">http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml</a></p> <p>18.</p> <p><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm">http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F894...</a></p> <p>"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said<br /> they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men<br /> were legitimate targets because they ran."</p> <p>19.</p> <p><a href="http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872">http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872</a></p> <p>CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph<br /> circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S.<br /> soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who<br /> are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign<br /> written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad,<br /> th[en] he knocked up my sister!"</p> <p>(Link to photo: <a href="http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg">http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg</a>)</p> <p>20.</p> <p> Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"<br /> [this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]</p> <p>This information would take a well paid intelligence officer,<br /> or CBC reporter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow<br /> ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news report on<br /> it.</p> <p>21. </p> <p>INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?</p> <p>SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.</p> <p>INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.</p> <p>SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.</p> <p>"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the<br /> water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It<br /> sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it<br /> gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The<br /> combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such<br /> that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic<br /> alterations."</p> <p>[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy<br /> metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth<br /> of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC<br /> and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically<br /> measurable extremely serious health concern issue..]</p> <p>22. </p> <p>Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his<br /> plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the<br /> President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable."<br /> Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report<br /> regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state<br /> something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify his<br /> opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that<br /> matter."</p> <p>23.</p> <p>The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally<br /> signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."<br /> (See original at <a href="http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf">http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf</a>)</p> <p>24. </p> <p>U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'</p> <p>"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of<br /> war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq<br /> would have made him a war criminal.</p> <p>He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant<br /> Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other<br /> soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and<br /> a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint."</p> <p>25.</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html</a></p> <p>that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating<br /> detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out<br /> of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the<br /> abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."</p> <p>26.</p> <p><a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml">http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml</a></p> <p>A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for<br /> allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his<br /> reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the<br /> White House's pre-war position.</p> <p>27.</p> <p>``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the<br /> infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for<br /> doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act<br /> of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''</p> <p>28.</p> <p>Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed<br /> out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to<br /> testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man.<br /> Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over<br /> which of them had scored Company C's first kill.</p> <p>29.</p> <p>It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County,<br /> Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638<br /> people had actually voted.</p> <p>30.</p> <p><a href="http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970">http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970</a><br /> <a href="http://wallofhate.com">http://wallofhate.com</a></p> <p>Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old<br /> Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die</p> <p>"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a<br /> girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to<br /> death."</p> <p>"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a<br /> three-year-old, needs to be killed."</p> <p>31. </p> <p>US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60<br /> artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers.<br /> [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one building<br /> in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on<br /> the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs<br /> were dropped in the city's northwest.</p> <p>[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a<br /> kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah<br /> alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave,<br /> exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]</p> <p>32.</p> <p>The Bush Administration<br /> In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words<br /> Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST</p> <p>By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle</p> <p>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted<br /> Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.<br /> 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban.<br /> The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had<br /> requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of<br /> elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week<br /> that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to<br /> the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by<br /> Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning<br /> military options for an invasion of Iraq."</p> <p>[ And...]</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html</a></p> <p>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted<br /> Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept.<br /> 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban."</p> <p>This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through<br /> prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the<br /> Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to<br /> persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only<br /> needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence<br /> to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a<br /> result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not<br /> follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab<br /> to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret<br /> plot.</p> <p>33.</p> <p>Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated,<br /> that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N.<br /> resolution: 1441.</p> <p>HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform<br /> professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to<br /> increase aerial surveillance..."</p> <p>With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the<br /> Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of<br /> an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about<br /> any good or better thing. American soldiers are being<br /> sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if<br /> progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring<br /> about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the<br /> Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for<br /> nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped 19 billion<br /> to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent<br /> back.</p> <p>34.</p> <p>Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went<br /> public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic<br /> paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not<br /> support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official<br /> government story. It should be known that World Trade Center<br /> Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly<br /> the same as the two towers.</p> <p>Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only<br /> creatable with the heating by high explosives.</p> <p>Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"</p> <p>The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's<br /> Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of<br /> Motion.</p> <p>..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum<br /> temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they<br /> possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of<br /> steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it<br /> becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.</p> <p>The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:</p> <p> - Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc<br /> - Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction<br /> - and the American Free Press newspaper</p> <p>35.</p> <p>"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got<br /> the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on<br /> Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..."</p> <p>Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee</p> <p>36.</p> <p>The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.</p> <p>At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar,<br /> Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands.<br /> Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader<br /> Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and<br /> its allies.</p> <p>Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban<br /> were reported as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite<br /> Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of<br /> Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a<br /> military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If<br /> Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a<br /> war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold.<br /> Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when<br /> MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret<br /> invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan<br /> had been "fully implemented"</p> <p>38.</p> <p>"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it<br /> is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it<br /> is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it<br /> is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or<br /> a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people<br /> can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is<br /> easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being<br /> attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism<br /> and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi<br /> leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II</p> <p>39.</p> <p>On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall<br /> not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou<br /> shall not be a by-stander"</p> <p>----------------</p> <p>When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.</p> <p> =Helen &amp; Harry Highwater=</p> <p>---</p> <p>HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE! </p> <p>Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!</p> <p>Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the<br /> Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit! </p> <p>Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the<br /> terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!</p> <p>Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out<br /> without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently<br /> working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these<br /> continuing documented crimes!!! </p> <p>50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!</p> <p>Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's Premier!!!!!</p> <p>SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND!</p> <p>Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who<br /> will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do<br /> something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.<br /> Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get<br /> railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness<br /> as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.</p> <p>The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!</p> <p>I AM INNOCENT.</p> <p>The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense<br /> without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!</p> <p>HELP!!!</p> <p>---</p> <p>Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal<br /> matters, Legal Aid is not required to lend assistance on the<br /> grounds that I'm not co-operating with the system as it<br /> operates through professional Barred representations. [I am<br /> eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of<br /> assistance I am requesting] Considering the complexity of my<br /> judicial matter, I would request legal assistance from the<br /> Court in these following areas.</p> <p>1. National Security Issues</p> <p>I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our<br /> national security services are obligated to practice under, to<br /> insure our national security matters are being truly defended<br /> in my respect. No change in summation of my character was<br /> altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify it<br /> was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers<br /> denied their rights to speak freely, then as the Court knows,<br /> instead of doing what they argued to grant such privilege to<br /> infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than perfect<br /> law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored<br /> no criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on<br /> the rights of any child. For I challenge; it does not serve<br /> Canada's interest (in particular our teen soldiers) to<br /> knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious failures<br /> of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting<br /> cry to hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with<br /> evidence and everything, President Bush's business partner,<br /> (who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working on the top<br /> secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin<br /> pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing<br /> children - done all for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit<br /> his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's "mastermind"<br /> "ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have<br /> notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried<br /> employees, have done practically nothing to serve Canada's<br /> interest in this respect. While Canada's CSIS does not have<br /> the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding the criminal<br /> transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature<br /> of CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with<br /> by trying. A CSIS officer told me, many were completely aware<br /> of President Bush's criminality regarding his hugely<br /> treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do<br /> practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports<br /> with the federal government, or maybe anonymously sending<br /> something to CBC, with no promises that anyone would actually<br /> read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags<br /> contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his<br /> friends in the ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine<br /> as a threat to all of Canada's Honorable police officers and<br /> Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's appointed head of<br /> the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is<br /> genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take<br /> a stand on this issue, [if he even received said reports] on<br /> behalf of honorable police officers and soldiers everywhere,<br /> in defense of the human race, risking everything, considering<br /> he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians<br /> where he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids<br /> to war for whatever Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg<br /> ("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the public assets so<br /> let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know<br /> the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top<br /> secret reason they have not perused Justice for the sake of<br /> Canadian soldiers who bravely put their lives on the line, of<br /> which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian would<br /> tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide<br /> for themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few<br /> Canadians have died thus far, but when will the sacrifice of<br /> Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon to be Iranians with the<br /> Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries officially<br /> marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite<br /> terrorists, be more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly<br /> reported repeatedly in European press, Mr. Sattler ordered<br /> the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as first strike<br /> targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"<br /> report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal<br /> more from America in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's<br /> command, they proceeded to monstrously murder more than two<br /> hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering the region in<br /> radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a<br /> scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth<br /> is what un- arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all<br /> living things. God included. An aside: Did you know the<br /> commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'<br /> Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took<br /> up the job at the request of the Bush junta, and subsequently<br /> left near 170 tons of plastic explosives unprotected for<br /> looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he commanded to<br /> leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad,<br /> with, I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he<br /> replied, he just wanted to let us know he was there. "We just<br /> wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In Basra, the<br /> coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known<br /> weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con<br /> peenacker gang can't steal everything without a stupid man war<br /> going. Left continuing unattended without national<br /> discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent<br /> victims of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that<br /> instead of me seeking to find where it is written, that the<br /> RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine eleven,<br /> perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national<br /> CBC radio forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international<br /> press release acknowledging briefly our failures to<br /> communicate in the past, and politely request where Canada<br /> could go through open line discussions on these very serious<br /> matters. We must not allow our soldiers to be made<br /> misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to bravely with honor,<br /> defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to<br /> consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP<br /> spokesperson?, a paid consultant for my expertise in<br /> recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll go out there, and<br /> win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we<br /> stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war<br /> criminals, we all will be the better for it. Now, take me to<br /> your leader.</p> <p>2. Local Police Issues</p> <p>As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the<br /> previous motions, through considering the charge that was<br /> brought against me, (where no criminal intent in alleged, and<br /> nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is already at<br /> least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still<br /> without my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child<br /> exploitation unit is not operating in a manner that would<br /> effectually reduce the proliferation of truly illegal<br /> materials. They have included images to demonize me that they<br /> must know are left legal to distribute, or for those couple<br /> images categorized as for sure illegal unto themselves, are<br /> left publicly unhindered when it comes to Police questioning<br /> in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.<br /> Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously<br /> operating in a nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer<br /> gears to sell as sadomasochists who enjoy seeing lovers of<br /> life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but come on,<br /> something seriously needs to be done in how things there are<br /> run. I believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal<br /> fears officers have of the information universe; for to<br /> acknowledge information sharing through p2p networks or<br /> Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the<br /> score going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty<br /> for high treason in God's America for example, Iraqi church<br /> goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers, women raped by<br /> "freedom fighting" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are<br /> being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4)<br /> with a math game scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but<br /> not the "Free Press" editor, or commercial savvy CJOB's Vic<br /> G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our dying<br /> universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know<br /> he's guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to<br /> formulate their own conclusions through our media on why we<br /> have laws. Anyway, I need to have some one to cross check the<br /> "illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to see<br /> which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what<br /> if any attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found<br /> providers. I suspect many providers they would claim they<br /> can't do anything about, are so not because a crime is<br /> occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal<br /> conduct would be required before an internet provider, server,<br /> or site owner could be recommended for censorship. Not this,<br /> twenty year olds look like they could be ten year olds, or<br /> that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed<br /> in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.</p> <p>To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain<br /> transparently coded checksum program checker to automatically<br /> recognize, known illegal materials made available free, with a<br /> downloadable database updated by the work of one or two<br /> officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic<br /> - classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the<br /> country. This action is good to take despite my personal<br /> innocence or fraudulent guilt, for media labelings are<br /> completely impossible to designate content/control, but as<br /> such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where<br /> possibly actual hugely offensive content is being distributed<br /> through. With volunteer co- operation of programming, a user,<br /> server, or internet service provider could be warned of<br /> material almost in their possession as expression is<br /> classified criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on.<br /> I'm confident such Police planning with open for public<br /> appeals to fine tune further, would end putting the hugely<br /> profitable exploitation units across the continent almost<br /> completely out of business. Now, who truly wants that?</p> <p>3. Constitutional Challenges</p> <p>This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto<br /> guilty to lose all their stolen computer gear through<br /> fraudulent demonization of the innocent included, is a for<br /> sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public<br /> inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is<br /> needing to locate only a small few arguably illegal<br /> depictions, then trumping up a lot of fraudulent totals.<br /> Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting<br /> individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when<br /> witnessed, people might begin to ask, just how much money is<br /> the unit taking in sold stolen merchandise? Perhaps 50,000<br /> dollars in a single case where the business owner of said<br /> stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense!<br /> No troublesome Court appearance required to protect your<br /> public business image even! Generally, in cases that do reach<br /> trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts, and at<br /> the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a<br /> small sample is only offered. [The professional naked people<br /> person they have in my case I suspect is lost somewhere in<br /> bushville as the clinically insane, or just extremely helpful<br /> to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has<br /> worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense<br /> wouldn't generally see a connection. For only one freely<br /> available image that you couldn't see until you already had<br /> it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian,<br /> in prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such<br /> convictions insist irrationally that the guilty must also be<br /> sexually deviant and require professional counseling. The law<br /> enforced absent rights infringed needs to be Constitutionally<br /> challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as<br /> being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual<br /> assault for comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault<br /> that was never truly made?] So, as a result, I need the<br /> assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide me<br /> consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant<br /> Constitutional questions regarding this specific challenge.<br /> And maybe co-operation with the Crown or Police chief to tally<br /> records and total sales figures on cases under similar<br /> circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for<br /> re-evaluation. [Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance<br /> argument given by all similar units, is that nothing can be<br /> securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently<br /> ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have<br /> a real hidden problem here regarding their/our intelligence<br /> gathering capabilities.] While maybe supporting public<br /> discussions on how to even improve further, the valuable work<br /> that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere<br /> I'm sure to operate for our interests. We may together have<br /> to overthrow CJOB with our human skills at demanding some<br /> space to talk about bettering our lives by communicating<br /> without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening<br /> up the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much<br /> from us as the clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so<br /> who's talk radio station is it anyway?</p> <p>4. The Crown's Crown</p> <p>I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our<br /> community asks a Crown to bravely achieve. One, would be to<br /> pursue Justice for the principled betterment of our society.<br /> It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our<br /> corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another,<br /> that such noble reaches must be left from the grasp of<br /> Canadian soldiers and their loving giving families. This<br /> place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be<br /> treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had<br /> murdered in America under these left silenced demands for a<br /> true accounting by good police work completed already. The<br /> fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when proudly<br /> defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus<br /> far, absent in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read<br /> statements from the Crown stating, John's legal arguments<br /> against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown<br /> hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an<br /> unjust and blind totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted<br /> uncertainty is forsaking the innocent lives of Bush's<br /> continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown has a<br /> responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely<br /> suspect I don't hold the best of intentions towards life with<br /> everything I am. However, the Crown's summations of my<br /> character will never change the official FBI's conclusions<br /> arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real<br /> murder scene, to discover who personally is still escaping<br /> arrest for mass murder of our good friends in New York City on<br /> 9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators obviously<br /> faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate<br /> continuous failures by our Crown to serve our public interest.<br /> For whatever reason, my case documents a corporate news agenda<br /> of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice for ourselves as<br /> the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all<br /> Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC<br /> standards. Canada is being left not defending honorable<br /> American police officers, doing their jobs to the best of<br /> their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown<br /> unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our<br /> names.) So, I would ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out<br /> for Canada, while fighting to silence my cries with an unjust<br /> as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for obstructing<br /> Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist<br /> crimes of first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this...<br /> I'm not sure. Perhaps the Court's assistance of aid in the<br /> form of one or two Crown offices from a different province in<br /> Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm more<br /> up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has<br /> tricked my nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into<br /> excepting Canadians can not hear the silenced screams of<br /> global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need to die for<br /> Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be<br /> Canada, a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal<br /> Justice always. Just ask US.</p> <p>Your Friend,</p> <p>John W.</p> <p>-----------------</p> <p>I know I'm innocent under the law as it currently stands, and<br /> in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the law stands<br /> unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal<br /> intent to obtain or distribute something illegal alleged<br /> against myself, and the simple truth that one can not perceive<br /> an image until it is at the very least, already in one's<br /> possession, says enough by itself. But most importantly, the<br /> Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my<br /> expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a<br /> written work from one who espouses the glories of war criming,<br /> but I, personally, am diametrically opposed to it's unwise<br /> declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of<br /> my world in which I politically work to improve God's World<br /> through indivisibly principled reason.</p> <p>Feel free to do with this as you will.</p> <p>---------------</p> <p>THE QUEEN'S BENCH</p> <p>WINNIPEG CENTRE</p> <p>NOTICE OF MOTION</p> <p>For an Order of Production</p> <p>BETWEEN:</p> <p>HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,</p> <p>and</p> <p>JOHNNY WIZARD</p> <p>Accused.</p> <p>This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to<br /> have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without<br /> undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused<br /> as a member of our public. These following arguments are the<br /> reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:</p> <p>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person<br /> shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person<br /> except in accordance with the principles of fundamental<br /> justice."</p> <p>R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a<br /> general duty to disclose all relevant information."</p> <p>In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once<br /> again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the<br /> accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full<br /> and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the<br /> criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return<br /> my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is<br /> motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true<br /> accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our<br /> Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge<br /> against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands<br /> currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent<br /> moral support of every honorable top secret intelligence<br /> officer this world over.</p> <p>Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian<br /> Officials in Relation to Maher Arar"</p> <p>"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations<br /> are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial<br /> scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility<br /> acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was<br /> an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the<br /> irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing<br /> Canadian jurisprudence.]</p> <p>Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the<br /> evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a<br /> possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For<br /> it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds<br /> any legitimacy.</p> <p>It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust<br /> Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but<br /> for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus<br /> rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands<br /> of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.</p> <p>I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to<br /> counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges,<br /> when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a<br /> child are being compromised when she makes her defined as<br /> sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my<br /> computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions.<br /> Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of<br /> words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated<br /> by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense<br /> against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our<br /> children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on<br /> by understanding the possession charge in relative context to<br /> the personal life of the accused.</p> <p>R. v. Sharpe</p> <p>"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that<br /> serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This<br /> refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may<br /> serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds<br /> it."</p> <p>So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must<br /> therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without<br /> any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available<br /> by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to<br /> indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent<br /> blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep<br /> concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my<br /> particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have<br /> lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed<br /> to express through our Police actions, a public interest in<br /> where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but<br /> instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent porno<br /> victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get<br /> away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America recently<br /> acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid,<br /> off of one single server found managed in violation, but have<br /> taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has<br /> ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what<br /> have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal<br /> imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly<br /> by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police<br /> services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year<br /> old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all<br /> her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a<br /> popular working web site and historical documentations, is<br /> just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer<br /> Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of<br /> thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do<br /> practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish<br /> intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple<br /> possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain<br /> or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a<br /> responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which<br /> the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The<br /> last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private<br /> legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content<br /> that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes<br /> into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding<br /> what the threat actually is.</p> <p>By exercising our right to perceive representations of that<br /> which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to<br /> the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of<br /> course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared<br /> reality.</p> <p>My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who<br /> are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running<br /> death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed<br /> by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public,<br /> [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing<br /> in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the<br /> dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential<br /> school districts to murder our children indiscriminately.<br /> Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable<br /> damage to North American children, or as currently, about John<br /> DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret<br /> White House-linked national child sex-ring entitled "The<br /> Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor<br /> [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our<br /> public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more<br /> specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official<br /> publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded<br /> the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his<br /> business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General<br /> Mahmoud Ahmad.</p> <p>[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has<br /> researched the Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN<br /> ABC et al, and can be quested for at <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca]">www.globalresearch.ca]</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html">http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html</a><br /> <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm">http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm</a></p> <p>The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily<br /> verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention,<br /> to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my<br /> communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire<br /> public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our<br /> public truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own<br /> General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure<br /> killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent<br /> bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is<br /> of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under<br /> the Taliban's getting better through communicating<br /> leadership?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and<br /> the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at<br /> the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas<br /> despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would<br /> suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her<br /> case against me, for those children's lives, and others like<br /> them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I<br /> demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the<br /> hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the<br /> light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord.</p> <p>The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal<br /> images, can be sited under a labeled classification of<br /> "collateral images", as somehow, unto it's separated self,<br /> being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character.<br /> Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury<br /> and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the<br /> significant meaning of each of these collateral damages<br /> against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a<br /> weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for<br /> making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with<br /> the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal<br /> property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately<br /> un-accosted, the completely blind support of indiscriminate<br /> mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to<br /> Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat<br /> leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of<br /> children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media<br /> matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and<br /> Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order<br /> to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when<br /> not terribly busy building this needed defense against the<br /> Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word<br /> for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]]</p> <p>I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of<br /> another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn<br /> texts.</p> <p>It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust<br /> Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but<br /> for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus<br /> rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands<br /> of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While<br /> sitting just outside my police door, could be the public<br /> accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly<br /> beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over<br /> the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an<br /> enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true<br /> personal self contempt, is there still escaping public<br /> ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform,<br /> could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part,<br /> for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A<br /> honorable defender that is needing by threat of false<br /> imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself<br /> personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite's<br /> favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as<br /> documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized<br /> lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose<br /> for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no<br /> evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually<br /> alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts<br /> unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did<br /> actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted<br /> without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people<br /> with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000<br /> missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000<br /> pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with<br /> the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds<br /> all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is<br /> a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the<br /> Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in<br /> jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to<br /> silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability<br /> here in Winnipeg.</p> <p>I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions<br /> and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of<br /> Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our<br /> behalf.</p> <p>By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made<br /> by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of<br /> what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative<br /> media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse<br /> to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can<br /> adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's<br /> confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least<br /> it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in<br /> contempt of our Court, would create an undue hardship on my,<br /> seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.<br /> Having to travel back and forth across the city to view<br /> hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case<br /> at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable<br /> atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know,<br /> I have to deal personally with those who support such a<br /> criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have<br /> them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my<br /> inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their<br /> boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great<br /> George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated<br /> American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I<br /> need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee<br /> and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense<br /> with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend.</p> <p>I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense<br /> stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to<br /> think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate<br /> what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted<br /> to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she<br /> don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal<br /> property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are<br /> you listening?</p> <p>I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used<br /> to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our<br /> society.</p> <p>I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real<br /> expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge<br /> the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the<br /> one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious<br /> matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed<br /> by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning,<br /> while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my<br /> written works they know mean a great deal to me personally.<br /> Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted<br /> fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is<br /> surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge<br /> honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of<br /> my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my<br /> specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my<br /> fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's<br /> Standing Sharpe decision.</p> <p>The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal<br /> possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent,<br /> unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from<br /> the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of<br /> real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court,<br /> because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's<br /> stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no<br /> interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending<br /> those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass<br /> murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little<br /> Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot<br /> nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for<br /> many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's<br /> Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well<br /> they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But<br /> this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended<br /> truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious<br /> business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns,<br /> and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the<br /> rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and<br /> you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news<br /> agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing<br /> standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected<br /> dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor<br /> criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present<br /> company???]]]</p> <p>I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument]<br /> images to sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively<br /> represent the Crown's faulting illogical argument in a<br /> brighter picture.</p> <p>I need to show what I did with obtained media information on<br /> general terms by mechanical processing through my very<br /> specific as unique operating systems, and through my<br /> definitive writing on the very subject we are here<br /> considering. I need operating script batch programs that do<br /> specific tasks regarding general media managements.</p> <p>I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet<br /> knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how<br /> it was legally accessed by my specific personal system,<br /> granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected<br /> artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using<br /> such services, informations aren't found perceived until, at<br /> the very least, they are already in one's possession, thereby<br /> making the Crown's standing accusation absent criminal intent<br /> clearly unjust. [those responsible for<br /> distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions<br /> are where the infraction against the public's interest can be<br /> compromised, but the exploitation units I'm aware of seem to<br /> have little of no financial interest in recognizing such a<br /> wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what<br /> should be worked to be made into redundancy.]</p> <p>I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for<br /> indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described<br /> with the Crown's own relative definitions, and what my media<br /> machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions.<br /> I need to reference my personal writings surmising the<br /> faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To<br /> surmise grand totals, as such the Crown's crew alleges of<br /> legal content she'll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages<br /> against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.</p> <p>If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is<br /> irrelevant to her criminal case, then what could the harm be<br /> honestly in showing the error of her ways? If she argues it<br /> jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to try<br /> convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would<br /> move that the charge against me be stayed, my property<br /> returned, and the Courts help me make a Constitutional<br /> challenge to the validity of the law, while communicating also<br /> Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out<br /> nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true<br /> money man - Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as<br /> bush's not so secret any longer private business partner,<br /> escaping he is from the mass murder of thousands of our good<br /> friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.</p>