Christ's Recorded Statement to America

"Holy Christ.." <!--break--> <img class="dada-image-center" src="http://rochester.indymedia.org/sites/default/files/migrate_dada/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3"><br> <img class="dada-image-center" src="http://rochester.indymedia.org/sites/default/files/migrate_dada/news-tunes.mp3"><br> Christ's Recorded Statement to America http://www.indybay.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3 http://utah.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3 "Holy Christ.." --- http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3 / / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty without any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if you disagree with him, he'll call you the enemy, the terorists who aren't with him on his blanket assertions against God as the innocent. he blames for crimes while shutting down criminal investigations. that would normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \ http://worcester.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3 / / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the demon anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are unaccountable to a rule a law. You know, South African death squad goons that murder my black brothers. Bush says they can't be held accountable to Iraqi law, and they can't be held accountable to American law. But American tax payers are going to pay them more than a thousand dollars a day, as a reward for being able to think, that all super stars in America don't have the humanity within themselves to speak in outrage on that fact alone. \ \ --- "the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also make clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating." http://www.antiwar.com/orig/schwartz.php?articleid=8338 / / This is terrorism by definition – attacking the civilian population to get it to withdraw support from the enemy. The change in strategy, therefore, represents the embrace of terrorism as the principle tactic for subduing the Iraqi resistance. \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/006455.php / / TALKING POINT: The illegal spying was required to monitor "calls from very bad people to very bad people who have a history of blowing up commuter trains, weddings and churches" FACT: False and false. If this were true, where is the list of people who blew up commuter trains, weddings and churches? Why are these monsters being hidden from public view and why were they only "monitored" and not arrested and deported from US soil? \ \ Naybe this is why.. / / In addition to Gertz, other journalists who feature prominently in the database include Seymour Hersh of The New Yorker; author and journalist James Bamford, James Risen of The New York Times, Vernon Loeb of The Washington Post, John C. K. Daly of UPI, and this journalist [Wayne Madsen]. \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR20051 22201101.html / / Daschle wrote. "This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United States[!], potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. [Congress] refused." \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD / / The National Security Agency, the top-secret spy shop that has been secretly eavesdropping on Americans under a plan authorized by President Bush four years ago, destroyed the names of thousands of Americans and US companies it collected on its own volition following 9/11 \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD / / The NSA ended up giving its raw data to then Under Secretary of State for Arms Control John Bolton on at least 10 different occasions since 9/11 \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD / / DNC Chairman Howard Dean pegged the total amount Bush received from Abramoff at $100,000. Abramoff attended three Hannukah receptions at the Bush White House - Hannukah? What happened to fighting the War on Christmas? - but Bush denies knowing him. "The president does not know him and does not recall meeting him," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD / / The President, according to Charley Savage of the Boston Globe, issued a "signing statement" -- "an official document in which a president lays out his interpretation of a new law" -- in which he "quietly reserved the right to bypass the [McCain] law under his powers as commander in chief." \ \ DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/framing_bin_laden.ht m / / The Taleban offered to turn Bin Laden over to a neutral party if the US provided any evidence to them that he had anything to do with the 1997 US African embassy bombings or the 9-11 attacks. The evidence was never presented to the Taleban for two reasons: 1. There was never any evidence, not even circumstantial \ \ "The future of our country is at risk. We cannot continue on the present course." Impeach Bush and Cheney Now! GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0103-05.htm / / "The Bush Administration blocked an independent probe into 9/11 while making fraudulent statements about the reasons for invading Iraq, and now admits that it spies on American citizens in disregard of legal limits. What more does Congress need before it says enough is enough?" Ms. Garrett added. \ \ / / DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls? \ \ / / NSA lawyers advised the agency to immediately destroy the names of thousands of American citizens and businesses it collected shortly after 9/11 in its quest to target terrorists in this country. \ \ / / Saddam told the lawyers that he did not demand massive revenge for a failed assassination attempt in 1982 in the village of Dujail -- the basis of his current trial. He said he just signed death warrants that judges had passed. "I never asked about the Dujail case since I left that place," he said. \ \ / / Paradoxically the gravest concern the US troops in Iraq face is not the Iraqi Resistance, but depleted uranium, which has already killed 11000 troops participating in the first Gulf War and disabled some 320,000, a number increasing by 43,000 a year, meaning that soon all the US troops in the first Gulf War have become casualties, and not only them: also their girlfriends have been contaminated too, and their children born with malignancies. \ \ / / One caller, for example, said, "My father served in Vietnam in 1961 and 1962. Is there a way he can find out if he was exposed to Agent Orange?" The VA's response, according to the VA memo: "He should know if they were spreading that chemical out then. He would be the only one to know. OK (hung up laughing)." \ \ / / In addition to arbitrary arrests, inhuman treatment, violation of residents’ rights and the theft of their belongings they shout upon entering towns in the Province “The army of AlHusain is here to break the noses of the Sunnis”. This is a simple indicator of the sectarianism and hatred of such groups which was not familiar to either Sunni or Shia Iraqis and is a further clear indicator of the treachery of the parties that entered from beyond the borders of the Iraqi people. \ \ / / ABON — ABRAMOFF ARRANGED MEETING WITH BUSH FOR A FEE: Abramoff “asked for $9 million in 2003 from the president of a West African nation to arrange a meeting with President Bush and directed his fees to a Maryland company now under federal scrutiny, according to newly disclosed documents. \ \ / / Bush told reporters after visiting wounded troops at Brooke Army Medical Center. "I think most Americans understand the need to find out what the enemy's thinking." \ \ / / The International Committee of the Red Cross has noted at least thirty locations in Basra that contain abandoned munitions and unexploded ordnance (UXO). Most of these weapons were abandoned by Iraqi forces, although some UXO were fired by coalition forces. None of these sites has been secured by the British forces occupying Basra. \ \ / / Does anyone really believe there are thousands of legitimate Al Qaeda targets to monitor in the U.S.? If so, just who is left for the U.S. to allegedly be hunting in Afghanistan? The entire Al Qaeda terrorist apparatus, and probably Hamas and the Red Army Faction, must have moved stateside to come up with those kinds of numbers! \ \ http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/57068 It did seem odd that the [bushite enemy] US forces went into the neighborhood warning people about a potential car bomb in the area, then used candy to lure the children out into the open. Using Zionist tactic, American troops bulldoze five houses in Hit. The "Shock and Awe" Gallery© http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&awe.php / / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused. They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which would never have been possible under the oppressive regime..." \ \ / / Instead, DynCorp is "very disappointed in the tribunal's ruling," and the company is considering an appeal. Is this denial or yet another indication of where this company stands on human slavery? If so it assuredly makes one wonder why the Virginia-based Missing and Exploited Children organization continues allowing its logo to be displayed on DynCorp's Website. \ \ / /But the main question that has to be asked, and which is so bewildering, is what it takes to get disqualified as a federal contractor. Are lawmakers, who appropriate hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to DynCorp, oblivious to the sexual outrages tolerated by this federal contractor, and would taxpayers approve of such enormous expenditures to a company that even appears to excuse or protect such behavior? \ \ / /There are many U.S. and international laws for prosecuting torturers and all other civilian and military criminals who commit cruel crimes. "While civilians may not generally be tried in military courts for violating U.S. laws, at least three [U.S.] federal laws provide a means for prosecuting non-military personnel, including [the Vice President for Torture, Bush-Cheney junta,] CIA officials and civilian contractors, for criminal activity: the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000; the War Crimes Act of 1996; and the Torture Act of 2000," according to Human Rights First (HRF), formerly the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. \ \ ---- Censorship is the tool of tyrants, exercised through the irrational bush whore thieves who fear open communications, intelligence, because we make them look as they truly are in the light of this day: profoundly ignorant as the ungodly, and oh yeah, truly evil. [this is why they volunteer as cowardly liars dying to commit war crimes against defenseless children in Iraq and Afghanistan as enemies to US all. All being Jesus, Allah, Hillel, Buddha, or who have you.] See the bushite, you kill it for America, you kill it for Christ, you kill it for the hundreds of thousands of innocent people that have been murdered in Your name. Victims that the bushite boasts bombing indiscriminately, to further steal and torture from openly. Do the right thing by saving some innocent People their lives by bagging a bushite for a loving Humanity that actually really does exist. I love Humanity so much, I'd kill bushite until every last anti-American torture supporter was put in it's rightly grave. Gotta brother father sister mother who's a bushite?, kill it for America, and be respected as a true defender of Freedom. Or not, and die just the same. For truly, a bushite will kill bushite for a stolen nickel. A nickel they likely stole from your own undefended American grand parent. By exercising your right to perceive representations of that which is freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared reality. Perceptions of our dying world war criminals fight by promoting censorship as our enemies to escape found accountability. HERO http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3 http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3 / / That is a high act of treason. And it's not, "oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have the two documents of question. \ \ ----------- http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3 / / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty without any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if you disagree with him, he'll call you the enemy, the terorists who aren't with him on his blanket assertions against God as the innocent. he blames for crimes while shutting down criminal investigations. that would normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \ http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3 / / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the demon anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are unaccountable to a rule a law. You know, South African death squad goons that murder my black brothers. Bush says they can't be held accountable to Iraqi law, and they can't be held accountable to American law. But American tax payers are going to pay them more than a thousand dollars a day, as a reward for being able to think, that all super stars in America don't have the humanity within themselves to speak in outrage on that fact alone. \ \ ---- "leveraging the lives of American soldiers in that process to be sacrificed as fodder, So all the while, (as again Senator Kennedy told US,) bush's business partners, these war profiteers can literally siphon billions of dollars from the undefended American tax payers." "Is that an American?" http://www.nancyredstar.com/newslinks/iraqkids.htm / / The biggest story [forbidden by CNN and CBC] of the Iraq war is about the torture of Iraqi children. \ \ http://rantburg.com/index.php?HC=1&D=7/21/2005#124578 / / We confirm that the American occupation in Iraq and its collaborators are the real killers of the Iraqi children and civilians in al-Musayyib and in Baghdad in the last few days.'' \ \ / / Mr. Tice intends to report to Congress probable unlawful and unconstitutional acts conducted while he was an intelligence officer with the National Security Agency (NSA) and with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). These acts involved the Director of the National Security Agency, the Deputies Chief of Staff for Air and Space Operations, and the U.S. Secretary of Defense \ \ ----- I am contacting you in hopes you will consider the threat of my false imprisonment here in Canada, an issue that You will assist me in gaining a fair defense from. I am welcoming Humanity to consider becoming involved in my case, to provide myself advice on defensive measures unknown for my lack of experience on such legalities. Feel free to contact us at your earliest convenience to inquire further with any questions not remedied by this e-mail, or other obligations I must meet to insure our help on this serious criminal matter. Feel free to forward or publish the affidavit and two motions present in this public notice. These following two Motions and Affidavit I am sending you have been filed at the Court of Queen's Bench here in Winnipeg, and also as Constitutional Challenges. I am hoping I can interest you in realizing that this challenge is not only important to me as a free citizen, but also for ourselves as the concerned world community. [the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices (Constitutional challenges) and the Provincial] Thanks for your consideration. Synopsis: I had been writing critically of the Bush Administration, when, the Secret Service top secretly requested I be arrested quietly for threatening the life of George W. Bush. They tentatively planned to have me arrested under the Mental Health Act to avoid a public criminal proceeding, but however during the process, I managed to speak convincingly to the Honorable RCMP, and the Secret Service, along with publicly speaking on local Manitoba radio for no less than forty hours regarding Bush in total, and was also well known throughout my community involvement in live acting man theatrical productions I've been a part of for more than a decade. ----------------- http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/psychological-warfare_.mp3 http://sydney.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/t-timebig16.mp 3 http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3 http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/canadian_radio_broadcast_interview_wit h_j._wizard.mp3 http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3 / / So, here I will offer you something I created, a Johnny Wizard pencil drawing in jpg format. Enjoy! \ \ http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/119755.php http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268441.shtml / / Instead of murdering our own families as war criminals for bush to pilfer the undefended wallets of our grandparents, why don't we all smarten up, and just kill the unarrested demon bush instead as something truly Patriotic? \ \ / / Of the many disclosures in the email exchange between the two, this is the most intriguing. On August 13, 2004, Tomlinson wrote Gigot: "Protect me on this. I am breaking my word by forwarding this Mintz/Moyers stuff - but it's too rich for you not to see. Please, please don't show it to anyone. But keep in mind as we have fun with this. Cheers-KT." \ \ / / The so-called international community has accepted the eventuality of a nuclear holocaust. \ \ / / "I absolutely confirm there were no terrorists in this house," police chief Colonel Sufyan Mustafa told Reuters. "Even if there had been, why didn't they surround the area and detain the terrorists instead?" The Baiji strike was one of 58 air missions the U.S. military carried out Monday over Iraq. "You can't have a corrupt lobbyist unless you have a corrupt member (of Congress) or a corrupt staff. This was a team effort," Gingrich told a Rotary Club lunch in Washington on Wednesday. The implications are overwhelming. \ \ / / Whether or not the targets were insurgents, the disregard for the lives of civilians trapped inside the buildings demolished by air attacks is part of a larger pattern articulated by an American officer to NY Times reporter Dexter Filkins early in the war: "the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also make clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating." \ \ ----------------- AFFIDAVIT AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba MAKE OATH AND SAY: 1. Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about $100,000 to hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and confirmed by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, 10/10/01, AFP, 10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is Saeed Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl in February 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in 2000. [CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank accounts and receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between June 19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01] 2. On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th, 2001, originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan premised on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the allegations, thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads innocence to a crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify" sacrificing American GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron. ["The Dahbol Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been sufficient to have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as others of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years. CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on the intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public devolvement of a just society. 3. RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls 21 September 2001 17:41 The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden in an American court. The US Government said there would be no negotiations. 4. [This following document was the official damning account] Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States 4 October 2001 http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp [This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's] "This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law." The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See? 5. Investigating the Investigation http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816 After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice president call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the president himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request." ...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush four days later, but "on other dates following" as well. 6. ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers02 1219.html Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations into a suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks... `You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations' 7. October 9 2001 - The Times of India "While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI [the "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after being superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India produced to show his links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The U.S. authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have confirmed that India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money transfer and the role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they said that Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the FBI in tracing and establishing the link." 8. No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So according to Bush's official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed he played no part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of starvation, Laden agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and CNN denied to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs. Once the indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the country of Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to defend US innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all fake video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking remotely like Laden, but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF as long in proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for some, the actor doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces never aired on CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the Internet. 9. former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill "the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia." 10. Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow "Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. They threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows." 11. Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete innocence with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty." 12. www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14 " [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. 11 hijackers were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said documents also included information relating to their financial activities. " 13. The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not be understated as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of Afghanistan to save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron. From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz " I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task Force meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken to remove the Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United States controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and have known since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract lawsuit in US District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million arbitration settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United States Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas." 14. From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New York), 25 May 2002: "We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt] Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and children to kill them." 15. Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting" by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc. Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of Chowkar- Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 civilians, a Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them dead." The reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the Chowkar incident, Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village." 16. US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm "American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - some of whom are entirely innocent. And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger." The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in mine as a expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational tyranny that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false imprisonments. An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to kill God’s children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that too? 17. Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml 18. http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0 F89437B.htm "Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no weapons, but that with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran." 19. http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872 CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the Internet of two Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys who are giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English that reads, "Lcpl Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!" (Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg) 20. Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated" [this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive] This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter no more that thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national news report on it. 21. INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation? SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive. INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it. SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank. "Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and heavy metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get genetic alterations." [thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, oxidized to microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in our airspace, however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically measurable extremely serious health concern issue..] 22. Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power to use military force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are unreviewable." Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the torturing of innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t have to justify his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter." 23. The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush personally signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order." (See original at http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf) 24. U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies' "Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and that forcing Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal. He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, who is expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis, including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military checkpoint." 25. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering Defense Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, confiscating evidence of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained." 26. http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating against him for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to support the White House's pre-war position. 27. ``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill people, and I had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any act of violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.'' 28. Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light him up!" the sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the unarmed man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which of them had scored Company C's first kill. 29. It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct that tallied 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted. 30. http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970 http://wallofhate.com Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH] school girl is about to die "It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10. She's behind the embankment, scared to death." "Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed." 31. US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds on Monday, said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district said one building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the neighborhood overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's northwest. [destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all TRUE accounts of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden to leave, exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.] 32. The Bush Administration In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had requested a CIA briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's assertion this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side" appeared to be contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq." [ And...] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html "Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda and the Taliban." This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of Muslim fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad] to persecute the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had officially done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, and as a result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene leads at the real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top secret plot. 33. Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had failed to comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441. HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform professional no-notice inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..." With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush Administration pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an ability to bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed for no better good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when they work to bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush Administration starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for Bremer shipped 19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back. 34. Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several weeks ago after releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics do not support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story. It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck by an airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers. Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the heating by high explosives. Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani" The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies, and also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion. ..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature of 1517 degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when the melting point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes a molten liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit. The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by: - Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc - Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction - and the American Free Press newspaper 35. "To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11..." Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee 36. The Washington Post, 23 September 2001. At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he delivered the bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban leader Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies. Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were reported as a "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of eidence was part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military intervention which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main justification for waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor would the ready to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding the top secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been "fully implemented" 38. "Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II 39. On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a victim, thou shall not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander" SWORN before me in the City of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba, [this affidavit was sworn in federally and provincially as a massive Canadian Constitutional challenge] ---------------- THE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE NOTICE OF MOTION For an Order of Production BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and JOHNNY WIZARD Accused. This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice." R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to disclose all relevant information." In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case. Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two: that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top secret intelligence officer this world over. Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar" "The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism." [Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian jurisprudence.] Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown holds any legitimacy. It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy. As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense against fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised, can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in relative context to the personal life of the accused. R. v. Sharpe "Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the possessor actually holds it." So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of "overreaching" are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause before then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever, to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty, until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly misunderstanding what the threat actually is. By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our shared reality. My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's just released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on who orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad. [University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for at www.globalresearch.ca] http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and who outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? Women who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect. So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these proceedings to our Honorable Lord. The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood, still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as treated fairly.]] I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's expressions, of some managed images, or some strewn texts. It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing any better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts unchallenged nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000 missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg. I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe decision allows this defense to be made on our behalf. By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as "collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,] while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, is nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an undue hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points. Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, I have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W. Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the evidence I demand the fair right to contend. I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don't want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the Crown's crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening? I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society. I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by our law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the community, to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's Standing Sharpe decision. The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge] Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, because usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually. And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for first degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you. So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal, 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]] I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture. I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems, and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering. I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding general media managements. I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using such services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.] I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's own relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising the faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals, as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan despairingly of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock. If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man - Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so secret any longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans. I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides. In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court, my TRUE intent as motive on this matter. Yours truly, JOHNNY WIZARD ------------------------------------ THE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE NOTICE OF MOTION for the Crown to Stay Proceedings BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and JOHNNY WIZARD Accused. The Validity of the Law While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, being in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the public body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, importantly, can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already guilty on nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too late to point fingers elsewhere. It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing through the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by an arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the window, leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this country don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit crack head loser?" The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove a criminal intent to do her things. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly misunderstanding what the threat actually is. A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge, but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City. An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such materials are expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as testaments to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of sexually exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison sentence is being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable interpretations of the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own. Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be legal, originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we expect the child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your alledged deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god honest, testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your unseen character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could be made found only in simple possession of the accusers relative perception? For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over eighteen and had her own legal website, don't matter for indictment, cause the expert of expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional computer porno viewer, states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve. You're for sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad thoughts punishable with

<p>"Holy Christ.."</p> <!--break--><p><img class="dada-image-center" src="http://rochester.indymedia.org/sites/default/files/migrate_dada/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3" /><br /><br /> <img class="dada-image-center" src="http://rochester.indymedia.org/sites/default/files/migrate_dada/news-tunes.mp3" /><br /><br /> Christ's Recorded Statement to America</p> <p><a href="http://www.indybay.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3">http://www.indybay.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3</a><br /> <a href="http://utah.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3">http://utah.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3</a></p> <p>"Holy Christ.."</p> <p>---</p> <p><a href="http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3">http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p>/ / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty without<br /> any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if you disagree<br /> with him, he'll call you the enemy, the terorists who aren't<br /> with him on his blanket assertions against God as the innocent.<br /> he blames for crimes while shutting down criminal investigations.<br /> that would normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \</p> <p><a href="http://worcester.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3">http://worcester.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p>/ / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the demon<br /> anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are unaccountable to<br /> a rule a law. You know, South African death squad goons<br /> that murder my black brothers. Bush says they can't be held<br /> accountable to Iraqi law, and they can't be held accountable<br /> to American law. But American tax payers are going to pay them<br /> more than a thousand dollars a day, as a reward for being able<br /> to think, that all super stars in America don't have the<br /> humanity within themselves to speak in outrage on that fact<br /> alone. \ \</p> <p>---</p> <p>"the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also make<br /> clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating."</p> <p><a href="http://www.antiwar.com/orig/schwartz.php?articleid=8338">http://www.antiwar.com/orig/schwartz.php?articleid=8338</a></p> <p>/ / This is terrorism by definition – attacking the<br /> civilian population to get it to withdraw support from the<br /> enemy. The change in strategy, therefore, represents the<br /> embrace of terrorism as the principle tactic for subduing<br /> the Iraqi resistance. \ \</p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p><a href="http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/006455.php">http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/006455.php</a></p> <p>/ / TALKING POINT: The illegal spying was required to<br /> monitor "calls from very bad people to very bad people who<br /> have a history of blowing up commuter trains, weddings and<br /> churches"</p> <p>FACT: False and false. If this were true, where is the<br /> list of people who blew up commuter trains, weddings and<br /> churches? Why are these monsters being hidden from public<br /> view and why were they only "monitored" and not arrested<br /> and deported from US soil? \ \ </p> <p>Naybe this is why..</p> <p>/ / In addition to Gertz, other journalists who feature<br /> prominently in the database include Seymour Hersh of The<br /> New Yorker; author and journalist James Bamford, James<br /> Risen of The New York Times, Vernon Loeb of The Washington<br /> Post, John C. K. Daly of UPI, and this journalist [Wayne<br /> Madsen]. \ \ </p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR20051">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR20051</a></p> <p>22201101.html</p> <p>/ / Daschle wrote. "This last-minute change would have<br /> given the president broad authority to exercise expansive<br /> powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he<br /> wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United<br /> States[!], potentially against American citizens. I could<br /> see no justification for Congress to accede to this<br /> extraordinary request for additional authority.<br /> [Congress] refused." \ \ </p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p>/ / The National Security Agency, the top-secret spy shop<br /> that has been secretly eavesdropping on Americans under a<br /> plan authorized by President Bush four years ago,<br /> destroyed the names of thousands of Americans and US<br /> companies it collected on its own volition following 9/11 \ \</p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p>/ / The NSA ended up giving its raw data to then Under<br /> Secretary of State for Arms Control John Bolton on at<br /> least 10 different occasions since 9/11 \ \ </p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p>/ / DNC Chairman Howard Dean pegged the total amount Bush<br /> received from Abramoff at $100,000. Abramoff attended<br /> three Hannukah receptions at the Bush White House -<br /> Hannukah? What happened to fighting the War on Christmas?<br /> - but Bush denies knowing him. "The president does not<br /> know him and does not recall meeting him," said White<br /> House spokesman Scott McClellan. \ \ </p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p>/ / The President, according to Charley Savage of the<br /> Boston Globe, issued a "signing statement" -- "an official<br /> document in which a president lays out his interpretation<br /> of a new law" -- in which he "quietly reserved the right<br /> to bypass the [McCain] law under his powers as commander<br /> in chief." \ \</p> <p>DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD</p> <p><a href="http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/framing_bin_laden.ht">http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/framing_bin_laden.ht</a></p> <p>m</p> <p>/ / The Taleban offered to turn Bin Laden over to a<br /> neutral party if the US provided any evidence to them that<br /> he had anything to do with the 1997 US African embassy<br /> bombings or the 9-11 attacks.</p> <p>The evidence was never presented to the Taleban for two<br /> reasons:</p> <p>1. There was never any evidence, not even circumstantial \ \ </p> <p>"The future of our country is at risk. We cannot continue<br /> on the present course."</p> <p>Impeach Bush and Cheney Now!<br /> GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES<br /> <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0103-05.htm">http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0103-05.htm</a></p> <p>/ / "The Bush Administration blocked an independent probe<br /> into 9/11 while making fraudulent statements about the<br /> reasons for invading Iraq, and now admits that it spies on<br /> American citizens in disregard of legal limits. What more<br /> does Congress need before it says enough is enough?" Ms.<br /> Garrett added. \ \ </p> <p>/ / DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the<br /> buying and selling of young women and children. While all<br /> of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract<br /> to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is<br /> now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine<br /> Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy<br /> of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic<br /> in women and little girls? \ \</p> <p>/ / NSA lawyers advised the agency to immediately destroy<br /> the names of thousands of American citizens and businesses<br /> it collected shortly after 9/11 in its quest to target<br /> terrorists in this country. \ \</p> <p>/ / Saddam told the lawyers that he did not demand massive<br /> revenge for a failed assassination attempt in 1982 in the<br /> village of Dujail -- the basis of his current trial. He<br /> said he just signed death warrants that judges had passed.<br /> "I never asked about the Dujail case since I left that<br /> place," he said. \ \</p> <p>/ / Paradoxically the gravest concern the US troops in<br /> Iraq face is not the Iraqi Resistance, but depleted<br /> uranium, which has already killed 11000 troops<br /> participating in the first Gulf War and disabled some<br /> 320,000, a number increasing by 43,000 a year, meaning<br /> that soon all the US troops in the first Gulf War have<br /> become casualties, and not only them: also their<br /> girlfriends have been contaminated too, and their children<br /> born with malignancies. \ \ </p> <p>/ / One caller, for example, said, "My father served in<br /> Vietnam in 1961 and 1962. Is there a way he can find out<br /> if he was exposed to Agent Orange?" The VA's response,<br /> according to the VA memo: "He should know if they were<br /> spreading that chemical out then. He would be the only<br /> one to know. OK (hung up laughing)." \ \</p> <p>/ / In addition to arbitrary arrests, inhuman treatment, violation<br /> of residents’ rights and the theft of their belongings they shout<br /> upon entering towns in the Province “The army of AlHusain is here<br /> to break the noses of the Sunnis”. This is a simple indicator of<br /> the sectarianism and hatred of such groups which was not familiar<br /> to either Sunni or Shia Iraqis and is a further clear indicator of<br /> the treachery of the parties that entered from beyond the borders<br /> of the Iraqi people. \ \ </p> <p>/ / ABON — ABRAMOFF ARRANGED MEETING WITH BUSH FOR A </p> <p>FEE: Abramoff<br /> “asked for $9 million in 2003 from the president of a West African<br /> nation to arrange a meeting with President Bush and directed his<br /> fees to a Maryland company now under federal scrutiny, according<br /> to newly disclosed documents. \ \ </p> <p>/ / Bush told reporters after visiting wounded troops at Brooke<br /> Army Medical Center. "I think most Americans understand the need<br /> to find out what the enemy's thinking." \ \ </p> <p>/ / The International Committee of the Red Cross has noted at<br /> least thirty locations in Basra that contain abandoned munitions<br /> and unexploded ordnance (UXO). Most of these weapons were<br /> abandoned by Iraqi forces, although some UXO were fired by<br /> coalition forces. None of these sites has been secured by the<br /> British forces occupying Basra. \ \ </p> <p>/ / Does anyone really believe there are thousands of legitimate<br /> Al Qaeda targets to monitor in the U.S.? If so, just who is left<br /> for the U.S. to allegedly be hunting in Afghanistan? The entire<br /> Al Qaeda terrorist apparatus, and probably Hamas and the Red Army<br /> Faction, must have moved stateside to come up with those kinds of<br /> numbers! \ \ </p> <p><a href="http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/57068">http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/57068</a></p> <p>It did seem odd that the [bushite enemy] US forces<br /> went into the neighborhood warning people about a<br /> potential car bomb in the area, then used candy to<br /> lure the children out into the open.</p> <p>Using Zionist tactic, American troops bulldoze five houses in Hit. </p> <p> The "Shock and Awe" Gallery©<br /> <a href="http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&amp;awe.php">http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&amp;awe.php</a></p> <p>/ / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused.<br /> They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which<br /> would never have been possible under the oppressive<br /> regime..." \ \</p> <p>/ / Instead, DynCorp is "very disappointed in the tribunal's<br /> ruling," and the company is considering an appeal. Is this denial<br /> or yet another indication of where this company stands on human<br /> slavery? If so it assuredly makes one wonder why the<br /> Virginia-based Missing and Exploited Children organization<br /> continues allowing its logo to be displayed on DynCorp's Website. \ \ </p> <p>/ /But the main question that has to be asked, and which is so<br /> bewildering, is what it takes to get disqualified as a federal<br /> contractor. Are lawmakers, who appropriate hundreds of millions<br /> of taxpayer dollars to DynCorp, oblivious to the sexual outrages<br /> tolerated by this federal contractor, and would taxpayers approve<br /> of such enormous expenditures to a company that even appears to<br /> excuse or protect such behavior? \ \ </p> <p>/ /There are many U.S. and international laws for<br /> prosecuting torturers and all other civilian and military<br /> criminals who commit cruel crimes. "While civilians may<br /> not generally be tried in military courts for violating<br /> U.S. laws, at least three [U.S.] federal laws provide a<br /> means for prosecuting non-military personnel, including<br /> [the Vice President for Torture, Bush-Cheney junta,] CIA<br /> officials and civilian contractors, for criminal activity:<br /> the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000;<br /> the War Crimes Act of 1996; and the Torture Act of 2000,"<br /> according to Human Rights First (HRF), formerly the<br /> Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. \ \ </p> <p>----</p> <p>Censorship is the tool of tyrants, exercised through the<br /> irrational bush whore thieves who fear open<br /> communications, intelligence, because we make them look as<br /> they truly are in the light of this day: profoundly<br /> ignorant as the ungodly, and oh yeah, truly evil. [this<br /> is why they volunteer as cowardly liars dying to commit<br /> war crimes against defenseless children in Iraq and<br /> Afghanistan as enemies to US all. All being Jesus, Allah,<br /> Hillel, Buddha, or who have you.]</p> <p>See the bushite, you kill it for America, you kill it for<br /> Christ, you kill it for the hundreds of thousands of<br /> innocent people that have been murdered in Your name.<br /> Victims that the bushite boasts bombing indiscriminately,<br /> to further steal and torture from openly. Do the right<br /> thing by saving some innocent People their lives by<br /> bagging a bushite for a loving Humanity that actually<br /> really does exist. I love Humanity so much, I'd kill<br /> bushite until every last anti-American torture supporter<br /> was put in it's rightly grave. Gotta brother father<br /> sister mother who's a bushite?, kill it for America, and<br /> be respected as a true defender of Freedom. Or not, and<br /> die just the same. For truly, a bushite will kill bushite<br /> for a stolen nickel. A nickel they likely stole from your<br /> own undefended American grand parent.</p> <p>By exercising your right to perceive representations of<br /> that which is freely available, is of in itself, important<br /> to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of<br /> course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our<br /> shared reality. Perceptions of our dying world war<br /> criminals fight by promoting censorship as our enemies to<br /> escape found accountability.</p> <p>HERO</p> <p><a href="http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3">http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3</a><br /> <a href="http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3">http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3</a></p> <p>/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,<br /> "oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have<br /> the two documents of question. \ \</p> <p>-----------</p> <p><a href="http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3">http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p>/ / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty<br /> without any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if<br /> you disagree with him, he'll call you the enemy, the<br /> terorists who aren't with him on his blanket assertions<br /> against God as the innocent. he blames for crimes while<br /> shutting down criminal investigations. that would<br /> normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \</p> <p><a href="http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3">http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p>/ / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the<br /> demon anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are<br /> unaccountable to a rule a law. You know, South African<br /> death squad goons that murder my black brothers. Bush<br /> says they can't be held accountable to Iraqi law, and they<br /> can't be held accountable to American law. But American<br /> tax payers are going to pay them more than a thousand<br /> dollars a day, as a reward for being able to think, that<br /> all super stars in America don't have the humanity within<br /> themselves to speak in outrage on that fact alone. \ \</p> <p>----</p> <p>"leveraging the lives of American soldiers in that<br /> process to be sacrificed as fodder, So all the while,<br /> (as again Senator Kennedy told US,) bush's business<br /> partners, these war profiteers can literally siphon<br /> billions of dollars from the undefended American tax<br /> payers."</p> <p>"Is that an American?"</p> <p><a href="http://www.nancyredstar.com/newslinks/iraqkids.htm">http://www.nancyredstar.com/newslinks/iraqkids.htm</a></p> <p>/ / The biggest story [forbidden by CNN and CBC] of the Iraq<br /> war is about the torture of Iraqi children. \ \</p> <p><a href="http://rantburg.com/index.php?HC=1&amp;D=7/21/2005#124578">http://rantburg.com/index.php?HC=1&amp;D=7/21/2005#124578</a></p> <p>/ / We confirm that the American occupation in Iraq and its<br /> collaborators are the real killers of the Iraqi children and<br /> civilians in al-Musayyib and in Baghdad in the last few days.'' \ \</p> <p>/ / Mr. Tice intends to report to Congress probable unlawful and<br /> unconstitutional acts conducted while he was an intelligence<br /> officer with the National Security Agency (NSA) and with the<br /> Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). These acts involved the<br /> Director of the National Security Agency, the Deputies Chief of<br /> Staff for Air and Space Operations, and the U.S. Secretary of<br /> Defense \ \ </p> <p>-----</p> <p>I am contacting you in hopes you will consider the threat of my<br /> false imprisonment here in Canada, an issue that You will assist<br /> me in gaining a fair defense from.</p> <p>I am welcoming Humanity to consider becoming involved in my case,<br /> to provide myself advice on defensive measures unknown for my lack<br /> of experience on such legalities. Feel free to contact us at your<br /> earliest convenience to inquire further with any questions not<br /> remedied by this e-mail, or other obligations I must meet to<br /> insure our help on this serious criminal matter. Feel free to<br /> forward or publish the affidavit and two motions present in this<br /> public notice.</p> <p>These following two Motions and Affidavit I am sending you have<br /> been filed at the Court of Queen's Bench here in Winnipeg, and<br /> also as Constitutional Challenges. I am hoping I can interest you<br /> in realizing that this challenge is not only important to me as a<br /> free citizen, but also for ourselves as the concerned world<br /> community.</p> <p>[the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices<br /> (Constitutional challenges) and the Provincial]</p> <p>Thanks for your consideration.</p> <p>Synopsis: I had been writing critically of the Bush<br /> Administration, when, the Secret Service top secretly<br /> requested I be arrested quietly for threatening the life<br /> of George W. Bush. They tentatively planned to have me<br /> arrested under the Mental Health Act to avoid a public<br /> criminal proceeding, but however during the process, I<br /> managed to speak convincingly to the Honorable RCMP, and<br /> the Secret Service, along with publicly speaking on local<br /> Manitoba radio for no less than forty hours regarding Bush<br /> in total, and was also well known throughout my community<br /> involvement in live acting man theatrical productions I've<br /> been a part of for more than a decade.</p> <p>-----------------</p> <p><a href="http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/psychological-warfare_.mp3">http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/psychological-warfare_.mp3</a></p> <p><a href="http://sydney.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/t-timebig16.mp">http://sydney.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/t-timebig16.mp</a></p> <p>3</p> <p><a href="http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3">http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3</a></p> <p><a href="http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/canadian_radio_broadcast_interview_wit">http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/canadian_radio_broadcast_interview_wit</a></p> <p>h_j._wizard.mp3</p> <p><a href="http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3">http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3</a></p> <p>/ / So, here I will offer you something I created, a Johnny<br /> Wizard pencil drawing in jpg format. Enjoy! \ \ </p> <p><a href="http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/119755.php">http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/119755.php</a></p> <p><a href="http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268441.shtml">http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268441.shtml</a></p> <p>/ / Instead of murdering our own families as war criminals for bush<br /> to pilfer the undefended wallets of our grandparents, why don't we<br /> all smarten up, and just kill the unarrested demon bush instead as<br /> something truly Patriotic? \ \</p> <p>/ / Of the many disclosures in the email exchange between the two,<br /> this is the most intriguing. On August 13, 2004, Tomlinson wrote<br /> Gigot: "Protect me on this. I am breaking my word by forwarding<br /> this Mintz/Moyers stuff - but it's too rich for you not to see.<br /> Please, please don't show it to anyone. But keep in mind as we<br /> have fun with this. Cheers-KT." \ \</p> <p>/ / The so-called international community has accepted the<br /> eventuality of a nuclear holocaust. \ \ </p> <p>/ / "I absolutely confirm there were no terrorists in this house,"<br /> police chief Colonel Sufyan Mustafa told Reuters. "Even if there<br /> had been, why didn't they surround the area and detain the<br /> terrorists instead?" </p> <p>The Baiji strike was one of 58 air missions the U.S. military<br /> carried out Monday over Iraq. "You can't have a corrupt lobbyist<br /> unless you have a corrupt member (of Congress) or a corrupt staff.<br /> This was a team effort," Gingrich told a Rotary Club lunch in<br /> Washington on Wednesday. The implications are overwhelming. \ \ </p> <p>/ / Whether or not the targets were insurgents, the disregard for<br /> the lives of civilians trapped inside the buildings demolished by<br /> air attacks is part of a larger pattern articulated by an American<br /> officer to NY Times reporter Dexter Filkins early in the war:<br /> "the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also<br /> make clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating." \ \ </p> <p>-----------------</p> <p>AFFIDAVIT</p> <p>AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD</p> <p>I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba<br /> MAKE OATH AND SAY:</p> <p>1.</p> <p>Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about </p> <p>$100,000 to<br /> hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India </p> <p>and confirmed<br /> by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal, </p> <p>10/10/01, AFP,<br /> 10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction </p> <p>is Saeed<br /> Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl </p> <p>in February<br /> 2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News </p> <p>they've now<br /> tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida </p> <p>to accounts<br /> held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] </p> <p>CNN also<br /> reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it </p> <p>came in 2000.<br /> [CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order </p> <p>must have<br /> preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank </p> <p>accounts and<br /> receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi </p> <p>between June<br /> 19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]</p> <p>2.</p> <p>On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had </p> <p>received<br /> anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated </p> <p>September 9th, 2001,<br /> originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade </p> <p>Afghanistan premised<br /> on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the </p> <p>allegations,<br /> thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads </p> <p>innocence to a<br /> crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify" </p> <p>sacrificing American<br /> GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron. </p> <p>["The Dahbol<br /> Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have </p> <p>been sufficient to<br /> have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had </p> <p>offered [as others<br /> of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.</p> <p>CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow </p> <p>up on the<br /> intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our </p> <p>public<br /> devolvement of a just society.</p> <p>3. </p> <p>RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls<br /> 21 September 2001 17:41</p> <p>The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban </p> <p>for proof that<br /> Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the </p> <p>US Secretary<br /> of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin </p> <p>Laden in an<br /> American court.</p> <p>The US Government said there would be no negotiations.</p> <p>4.</p> <p>[This following document was the official damning account]</p> <p>Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States<br /> 4 October 2001<br /> <a href="http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp">http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp</a></p> <p>[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]</p> <p>"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against </p> <p>Usama Bin Laden<br /> in a court of law."</p> <p>The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?</p> <p>5.</p> <p>Investigating the Investigation<br /> <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816">http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17816</a></p> <p>After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did </p> <p>the vice president<br /> call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle </p> <p>flatly<br /> contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 </p> <p>the president<br /> himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."</p> <p>...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. </p> <p>Bush four days<br /> later, but "on other dates following" as well.</p> <p>6.</p> <p>ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations<br /> <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers02">http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers02</a></p> <p>1219.html</p> <p>Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations </p> <p>into a<br /> suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the </p> <p>Sept. 11<br /> attacks...</p> <p>`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'</p> <p>7.</p> <p>October 9 2001 - The Times of India</p> <p>"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former </p> <p>ISI [the<br /> "Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought </p> <p>retirement after being<br /> superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed </p> <p>here on<br /> Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India </p> <p>produced to show his<br /> links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. </p> <p>The U.S.<br /> authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were </p> <p>wired to WTC<br /> hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar </p> <p>Saeed] at the<br /> instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have </p> <p>confirmed that<br /> India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money </p> <p>transfer and the<br /> role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, </p> <p>they said that<br /> Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the </p> <p>FBI in tracing<br /> and establishing the link."</p> <p>8.</p> <p>No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So </p> <p>according to Bush's<br /> official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed </p> <p>he played no<br /> part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of </p> <p>starvation, Laden<br /> agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and </p> <p>CNN denied<br /> to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American </p> <p>GIs. Once the<br /> indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the </p> <p>country of<br /> Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to </p> <p>defend US<br /> innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear </p> <p>to all fake<br /> video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking </p> <p>remotely like Laden,<br /> but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is </p> <p>HALF as long in<br /> proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for </p> <p>some, the actor<br /> doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces </p> <p>never aired on<br /> CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the </p> <p>Internet.</p> <p>9.</p> <p>former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill </p> <p>"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil </p> <p>corporate interests and<br /> the role played by Saudi Arabia."</p> <p>10.</p> <p>Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von </p> <p>Buelow</p> <p>"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop </p> <p>Al-Qaeda. They<br /> threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows."</p> <p>11.</p> <p>Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete </p> <p>innocence<br /> with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."</p> <p>12. </p> <p><a href="http://www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14">www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=14</a></p> <p>" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. </p> <p>11 hijackers<br /> were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said </p> <p>documents also<br /> included information relating to their financial activities. "</p> <p>13.</p> <p>The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not </p> <p>be understated<br /> as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of </p> <p>Afghanistan to<br /> save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.</p> <p>From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz</p> <p>" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy </p> <p>Task Force<br /> meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken </p> <p>to remove the<br /> Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United </p> <p>States<br /> controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and </p> <p>have known<br /> since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract </p> <p>lawsuit in US<br /> District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth </p> <p>Circuit Court of<br /> Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million </p> <p>arbitration<br /> settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United </p> <p>States<br /> Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."</p> <p>14.</p> <p>From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal </p> <p>(New<br /> York), 25 May 2002:</p> <p>"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt] </p> <p>Guckenheimer, an<br /> assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there </p> <p>was anybody<br /> there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were </p> <p>women and<br /> children to kill them."</p> <p>15.</p> <p>Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial </p> <p>Bombing of<br /> Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"</p> <p>by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.<br /> Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall<br /> Whittemore School of Business &amp; Economics University of New Hampshire</p> <p>When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of </p> <p>Chowkar-<br /> Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93 </p> <p>civilians, a<br /> Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them </p> <p>dead." The<br /> reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the </p> <p>Chowkar incident,<br /> Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."</p> <p>16.</p> <p>US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS<br /> <a href="http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm">http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm</a></p> <p>"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - </p> <p>some of whom<br /> are entirely innocent.</p> <p>And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the </p> <p>Pentagon's<br /> spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no </p> <p>dilemma<br /> when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the </p> <p>trigger."</p> <p>The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in </p> <p>mine as a<br /> expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An </p> <p>irrational tyranny<br /> that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false </p> <p>imprisonments.<br /> An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to </p> <p>kill God’s<br /> children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew </p> <p>that too? </p> <p>17.</p> <p>Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible </p> <p>for</p> <p><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml">http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml</a></p> <p>18.</p> <p><a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0">http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0</a></p> <p>F89437B.htm</p> <p>"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no </p> <p>weapons, but that<br /> with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."</p> <p>19.</p> <p><a href="http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872">http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1872</a></p> <p>CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the </p> <p>Internet of two<br /> Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys </p> <p>who are<br /> giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English </p> <p>that reads, "Lcpl<br /> Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"</p> <p>(Link to photo: <a href="http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg">http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg</a>)</p> <p>20.</p> <p> Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was </p> <p>frustrated"<br /> [this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]</p> <p>This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter </p> <p>no more that<br /> thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a </p> <p>national news<br /> report on it.</p> <p>21. </p> <p>INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with </p> <p>radiation?</p> <p>SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.</p> <p>INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.</p> <p>SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.</p> <p>"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It </p> <p>poisons the<br /> grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. </p> <p>When it gets<br /> into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity </p> <p>and heavy<br /> metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get </p> <p>genetic<br /> alterations."</p> <p>[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, </p> <p>oxidized to<br /> microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in </p> <p>our airspace,<br /> however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the </p> <p>scientifically measurable<br /> extremely serious health concern issue..]</p> <p>22. </p> <p>Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power </p> <p>to use military<br /> force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are </p> <p>unreviewable."<br /> Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the </p> <p>torturing of<br /> innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t </p> <p>have to justify<br /> his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."</p> <p>23.</p> <p>The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president </p> <p>Bush personally<br /> signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."<br /> (See original at <a href="http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf">http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf</a>)</p> <p>24. </p> <p>U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'</p> <p>"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and </p> <p>that forcing<br /> Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.</p> <p>He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, </p> <p>who is<br /> expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed </p> <p>Iraqis,<br /> including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military </p> <p>checkpoint."</p> <p>25.</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html</a></p> <p>that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering </p> <p>Defense<br /> Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, </p> <p>confiscating evidence<br /> of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."</p> <p>26.</p> <p><a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml">http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml</a></p> <p>A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating </p> <p>against him<br /> for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to </p> <p>support the<br /> White House's pre-war position.</p> <p>27.</p> <p>``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill </p> <p>people, and I<br /> had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war. Any </p> <p>act of<br /> violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''</p> <p>28.</p> <p>Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light </p> <p>him up!" the<br /> sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing </p> <p>the unarmed<br /> man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which </p> <p>of them had<br /> scored Company C's first kill.</p> <p>29.</p> <p>It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct </p> <p>that tallied<br /> 4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.</p> <p>30.</p> <p><a href="http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970">http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970</a><br /> <a href="http://wallofhate.com">http://wallofhate.com</a></p> <p>Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH] </p> <p>school girl is<br /> about to die </p> <p>"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10. </p> <p>She's behind the<br /> embankment, scared to death."</p> <p>"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, </p> <p>needs to be<br /> killed."</p> <p>31. </p> <p>US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds </p> <p>on Monday,<br /> said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district </p> <p>said one<br /> building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the </p> <p>neighborhood<br /> overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's </p> <p>northwest.</p> <p>[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all </p> <p>TRUE accounts<br /> of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden </p> <p>to leave,<br /> exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.] </p> <p>32.</p> <p>The Bush Administration<br /> In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words<br /> Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST</p> <p>By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle</p> <p>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim </p> <p>that the<br /> White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against </p> <p>al Qaeda and<br /> the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had </p> <p>requested a CIA<br /> briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And </p> <p>Rice's assertion<br /> this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side" </p> <p>appeared to be<br /> contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon </p> <p>to begin<br /> planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."</p> <p>[ And...]</p> <p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html</a></p> <p>"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim </p> <p>that the White<br /> House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al </p> <p>Qaeda and the<br /> Taliban."</p> <p>This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences </p> <p>of Muslim<br /> fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion </p> <p>[Jihad] to persecute<br /> the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had </p> <p>officially<br /> done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans, </p> <p>and as a<br /> result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime </p> <p>scene leads at the<br /> real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top </p> <p>secret plot.</p> <p>33.</p> <p>Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had </p> <p>failed to<br /> comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.</p> <p>HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform </p> <p>professional no-notice<br /> inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."</p> <p>With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush </p> <p>Administration<br /> pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an </p> <p>ability to<br /> bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed </p> <p>for no better<br /> good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when </p> <p>they work to<br /> bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush </p> <p>Administration<br /> starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for </p> <p>Bremer shipped<br /> 19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back.</p> <p>34.</p> <p>Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several </p> <p>weeks ago after<br /> releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of </p> <p>physics do not<br /> support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story.<br /> It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck </p> <p>by an<br /> airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers. </p> <p>Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the </p> <p>heating<br /> by high explosives.</p> <p>Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"</p> <p>The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling </p> <p>Bodies, and<br /> also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion. </p> <p>..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature </p> <p>of 1517<br /> degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when </p> <p>the melting<br /> point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it </p> <p>becomes a molten<br /> liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.</p> <p>The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:</p> <p> - Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc<br /> - Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction<br /> - and the American Free Press newspaper</p> <p>35.</p> <p>"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public </p> <p>consent to have<br /> suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on </p> <p>September 11..."</p> <p>Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee</p> <p>36.</p> <p>The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.</p> <p>At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he </p> <p>delivered the<br /> bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told </p> <p>Taliban leader<br /> Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies. </p> <p>Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were </p> <p>reported as a<br /> "failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of </p> <p>eidence was<br /> part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military </p> <p>intervention<br /> which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main </p> <p>justification for<br /> waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor </p> <p>would the ready<br /> to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse </p> <p>regarding the top<br /> secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been </p> <p>"fully<br /> implemented" </p> <p>38.</p> <p>"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of </p> <p>the country<br /> who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people </p> <p>along,<br /> whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a </p> <p>communist<br /> dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the </p> <p>bidding of the<br /> leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being </p> <p>attacked, and<br /> denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to </p> <p>danger." --<br /> Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II</p> <p>39.</p> <p>On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a </p> <p>victim, thou shall<br /> not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander"</p> <p>SWORN before me<br /> in the City of Winnipeg,<br /> Province of Manitoba,</p> <p>[this affidavit was sworn in federally and provincially as a massive<br /> Canadian Constitutional challenge]</p> <p>----------------</p> <p>THE QUEEN'S BENCH</p> <p>WINNIPEG CENTRE</p> <p>NOTICE OF MOTION</p> <p>For an Order of Production</p> <p>BETWEEN: </p> <p>HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,</p> <p>and</p> <p>JOHNNY WIZARD</p> <p> Accused.</p> <p>This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed </p> <p>to<br /> the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the </p> <p>Crown<br /> holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following<br /> arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:</p> <p>Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall </p> <p>be<br /> deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with<br /> the principles of fundamental justice."</p> <p>R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to<br /> disclose all relevant information."</p> <p>In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as </p> <p>any<br /> legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a<br /> Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case.<br /> Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my<br /> legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by<br /> contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally<br /> working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the </p> <p>charge<br /> against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two:<br /> that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top<br /> secret intelligence officer this world over.</p> <p>Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials </p> <p>in<br /> Relation to Maher Arar"</p> <p>"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are </p> <p>criminal<br /> investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the<br /> presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism."<br /> [Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by </p> <p>the<br /> irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian<br /> jurisprudence.]</p> <p>Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown<br /> holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her </p> <p>criminal<br /> allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown<br /> holds any legitimacy.</p> <p>It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving<br /> me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting </p> <p>degrees<br /> that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of<br /> thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.</p> <p>I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance </p> <p>the<br /> false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where<br /> specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes </p> <p>her<br /> defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my </p> <p>computer,<br /> deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written<br /> texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal </p> <p>philosophy.<br /> As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense </p> <p>against<br /> fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being </p> <p>compromised,<br /> can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge </p> <p>in<br /> relative context to the personal life of the accused.</p> <p>R. v. Sharpe</p> <p>"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an<br /> "educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the<br /> material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the<br /> possessor actually holds it."</p> <p>So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be </p> <p>backed<br /> firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A<br /> defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on </p> <p>personal\professional<br /> conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind<br /> "overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of </p> <p>"overreaching"<br /> are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of<br /> individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being<br /> managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where </p> <p>the<br /> "offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all<br /> going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth<br /> of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America<br /> recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off </p> <p>of<br /> one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause </p> <p>before<br /> then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for </p> <p>whatever,<br /> to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly<br /> legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the<br /> weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for<br /> the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her<br /> possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, </p> <p>a<br /> popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly<br /> impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty,<br /> until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do<br /> practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make<br /> off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no<br /> allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise,<br /> not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the<br /> criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we </p> <p>want in<br /> our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,<br /> promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the<br /> exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly<br /> misunderstanding what the threat actually is. </p> <p>By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made<br /> freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist,<br /> concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our<br /> shared reality.</p> <p>My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are </p> <p>personally<br /> responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent<br /> children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American </p> <p>tax<br /> paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in<br /> on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of </p> <p>cluster<br /> dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our </p> <p>children<br /> indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable<br /> damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's </p> <p>just<br /> released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked </p> <p>national<br /> child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real </p> <p>motivating<br /> factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's<br /> right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I<br /> articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on </p> <p>who<br /> orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. </p> <p>along<br /> with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General </p> <p>Mahmoud<br /> Ahmad.</p> <p>[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched </p> <p>the<br /> Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be </p> <p>quested for<br /> at <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca]">www.globalresearch.ca]</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html">http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html</a><br /> <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm">http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm</a></p> <p>The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass<br /> murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all<br /> children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the </p> <p>betterment of<br /> the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public<br /> truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is<br /> referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally<br /> broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT </p> <p>students of<br /> Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under<br /> the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and </p> <p>who<br /> outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? </p> <p>Women<br /> who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to </p> <p>wear<br /> burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would </p> <p>suggest her<br /> ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those<br /> children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect.<br /> So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the </p> <p>hiding<br /> in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these<br /> proceedings to our Honorable Lord.</p> <p>The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can </p> <p>be<br /> sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, </p> <p>unto<br /> it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled<br /> character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and<br /> comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning </p> <p>of<br /> each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the </p> <p>Crown<br /> argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for<br /> making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence </p> <p>the<br /> Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood,<br /> still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of<br /> indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to<br /> Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. </p> <p>While<br /> myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a<br /> studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the<br /> field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the<br /> chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not<br /> terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged<br /> criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as<br /> treated fairly.]]</p> <p>I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's </p> <p>expressions,<br /> of some managed images, or some strewn texts.</p> <p>It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving<br /> me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting </p> <p>degrees<br /> that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of<br /> thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting<br /> just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes </p> <p>proudly<br /> the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push<br /> US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such </p> <p>an<br /> enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal </p> <p>self<br /> contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's<br /> Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on<br /> my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable<br /> defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate </p> <p>on<br /> Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a<br /> bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as<br /> documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through </p> <p>the<br /> mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing </p> <p>any<br /> better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any<br /> factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts </p> <p>unchallenged<br /> nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors<br /> in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, </p> <p>indiscriminately<br /> murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000<br /> missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound </p> <p>bombs<br /> containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved </p> <p>napalm<br /> and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate </p> <p>age<br /> range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by<br /> the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the<br /> lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public<br /> cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.</p> <p>I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised<br /> world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe </p> <p>decision<br /> allows this defense to be made on our behalf.</p> <p>By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my </p> <p>false<br /> accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as<br /> "collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my </p> <p>computer,]<br /> while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property </p> <p>so<br /> I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, </p> <p>is<br /> nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me<br /> the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an </p> <p>undue<br /> hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.<br /> Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of </p> <p>thousands<br /> of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, </p> <p>and<br /> a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, </p> <p>I<br /> have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly </p> <p>nature<br /> when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening<br /> vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew<br /> their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W.<br /> Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would </p> <p>leave<br /> me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with </p> <p>good<br /> coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the<br /> evidence I demand the fair right to contend.</p> <p>I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made </p> <p>for<br /> near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The </p> <p>Crown<br /> has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not<br /> granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she </p> <p>don't<br /> want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the </p> <p>Crown's<br /> crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?</p> <p>I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise </p> <p>her<br /> relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.</p> <p>I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as<br /> public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider<br /> such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this<br /> serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by </p> <p>our<br /> law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as<br /> sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know </p> <p>mean a<br /> great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the </p> <p>community,<br /> to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely<br /> what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against </p> <p>the<br /> Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to<br /> establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I </p> <p>can<br /> establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of </p> <p>Canada's<br /> Standing Sharpe decision.</p> <p>The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a<br /> criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by </p> <p>made<br /> available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge]<br /> Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, </p> <p>because<br /> usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually.<br /> And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police<br /> agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for </p> <p>first<br /> degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish<br /> man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under<br /> Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be<br /> Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the<br /> Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this<br /> innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me </p> <p>is<br /> just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, </p> <p>the<br /> Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by<br /> following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and </p> <p>you.<br /> So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to<br /> our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against </p> <p>the<br /> un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor </p> <p>criminal,<br /> 911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]</p> <p>I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images </p> <p>to<br /> sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's<br /> faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.</p> <p>I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms </p> <p>by<br /> mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating </p> <p>systems,<br /> and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here </p> <p>considering.<br /> I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding<br /> general media managements.</p> <p>I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge </p> <p>sharing<br /> web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by </p> <p>my<br /> specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest<br /> collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using </p> <p>such<br /> services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they<br /> are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing<br /> accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for<br /> distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the<br /> infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the<br /> exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest<br /> in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered<br /> through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]</p> <p>I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for </p> <p>indicative<br /> examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's </p> <p>own<br /> relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding </p> <p>my<br /> for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising </p> <p>the<br /> faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals,<br /> as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan </p> <p>despairingly<br /> of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.</p> <p>If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her<br /> criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error </p> <p>of<br /> her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to<br /> try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move </p> <p>that<br /> the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts </p> <p>help me<br /> make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while<br /> communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking </p> <p>out<br /> nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man -<br /> Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so </p> <p>secret any<br /> longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of<br /> thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate </p> <p>Americans.</p> <p>I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to<br /> access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.</p> <p>In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by<br /> indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court,<br /> my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.</p> <p>Yours truly,</p> <p>JOHNNY WIZARD</p> <p>------------------------------------</p> <p>THE QUEEN'S BENCH</p> <p>WINNIPEG CENTRE</p> <p>NOTICE OF MOTION</p> <p>for the Crown to Stay Proceedings</p> <p>BETWEEN: </p> <p>HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,</p> <p>and</p> <p>JOHNNY WIZARD</p> <p> Accused.</p> <p>The Validity of the Law</p> <p>While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit<br /> child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, </p> <p>being<br /> in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the </p> <p>public<br /> body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my<br /> computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, </p> <p>importantly,<br /> can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your<br /> possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already guilty on<br /> nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too<br /> late to point fingers elsewhere.</p> <p>It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing </p> <p>through<br /> the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by </p> <p>an<br /> arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some<br /> completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the </p> <p>window,<br /> leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw<br /> the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this country<br /> don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the </p> <p>keys to<br /> the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit crack head<br /> loser?"</p> <p>The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove </p> <p>a<br /> criminal intent to do her things.</p> <p>See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to<br /> obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible<br /> public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as<br /> could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world </p> <p>is a<br /> setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing<br /> content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into </p> <p>your<br /> home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly<br /> misunderstanding what the threat actually is.</p> <p>A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your<br /> possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting<br /> Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge,<br /> but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and<br /> abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.</p> <p>An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such materials are<br /> expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as </p> <p>testaments<br /> to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of </p> <p>sexually<br /> exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously<br /> cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison sentence </p> <p>is<br /> being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable </p> <p>interpretations of<br /> the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own.<br /> Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term<br /> perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be legal,<br /> originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we expect </p> <p>the<br /> child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely<br /> Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as<br /> criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your </p> <p>alledged<br /> deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god </p> <p>honest,<br /> testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could<br /> leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your </p> <p>unseen<br /> character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly<br /> illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could be </p> <p>made<br /> found only in simple possession of the accusers relative perception?</p> <p>For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over eighteen </p> <p>and<br /> had her own legal website, don't matter for indictment, cause the expert of<br /> expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional </p> <p>computer<br /> porno viewer, states with a complete straight face, the full figured pubic<br /> wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve. You're for<br /> sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad thoughts<br /> punishable with</p>

public://migrate_dada/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3