HOWARD DEAN APPOINTEES GUILTY

Federal Court Finds DNC Chair Howard Dean’s Judicial Appointees Guilty

 

In a 1997 Vermont Press Bureau article, Howard Dean expressed his desire to appoint judges that were not so concerned about the Bill of Rights  --  or in Howard Dean lingo “legal technicalities”.

 

Howard kept his aim true.  Within two months of his proclamation, he appointed Nancy Corsones and Patricia Zimmerman to the
Vermont/>/> bench.

 

Shortly afterward,
Vermont/>/> prosecutors set their sites on a local activist.  Judge Corsones chose to advance justice in
Vermont/>/> by violating the activist’s rights against double jeopardy, his right to counsel and his right to due process.   Later, the Vermont Supreme Court sided with the activist and threw out the bogus criminal charges.

 

One spring morning in
Rutland/> Vermont/>/>, the activist appeared at Judge Corsones’ courthouse with signs on his van that detailed the Judge’s problems with the Bill of Rights.  The signs correctly labeled the Judge a “Butcher of the Constitution”.

 

Judge Corsones’ solution – banish the activist from the courthouse – for life.

 

In January of 2005 the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals in
Manhattan/>/> found that judgment should issue against Judge Corsones and her colleague for violation of the First Amendment rights to free expression and to courthouse access. 

 

Kudos to Howard Dean for truly accomplishing his proclaimed goals of subverting the Bill of Rights, or in this example, subversion of the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the United States Constitution via judicial appointments.  Sympathy to the Democratic Party for choosing such an arrogant and ignorant leader. 

 

Scott Huminski

s_huminski@hotmail.com

 

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/commentary.aspx?id=14208

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/commentary.aspx?id=2375

 

http://www.rcfp.org/news/2004/1012humins.html