Skip to main content
  • Prices & Collaborations , dc0774 Dates , Sneaker Calendar, Air Jordan 2 Retro Low "O.G.", Jordan , nike air jordan 12 retro indigo stone blue mens
  • Notorious B.I.G. x Air Jordan 13 Christopher Wallace Sotheby's Auction , Jordan Series Mid Cool Grey Outfits , SBD
  • Nike Air Jordan Getty 1 Mid Yellow Toe Black 27cm , Nike Air Jordan Getty 1 Mid Yellow Toe Black 27cm Barons Alternate Sample , SBD
  • The adidas neben Tubular is going hunting with its latest adidas neben Tubular Invader - Adidas neben T , IetpShops - Mac Millennium All Star Game Release Date Info
  • Travis Scott Air Jordan VIII 8 'White Black - Musee-jacquemart-andreShops , True Red' Low Black Phantom Release Date - Nike Men S Air Jordan Retro I 1 Mid Se Varsity Purple
  • air jordan 1 retro high og hyper royal
  • saquon barkley nike air trainer iii DA5403 200 release date
  • air jordan 1 mid diamond shorts
  • air jordan 14 retro gg hyper pink 654969 028
  • Air Jordan 4 GS Where The Wild Things Are DH0572 264 Release Date Price 4
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Press Release: The Police Accountability Board Alliance Strongly Opposes City Council’s Proposed Changes to the PAB Legislation (April 16, 2019)

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Devel(active tab)

Secondary tabs

  • Load(active tab)
  • Render
  • ... (Object) stdClass
    • vid (String, 6 characters ) 151085
    • uid (String, 3 characters ) 164
    • title (String, 146 characters ) Press Release: The Police Accountability Board ...
      • Press Release: The Police Accountability Board Alliance Strongly Opposes City Council’s Proposed Changes to the PAB Legislation (April 16, 2019)
    • log (String, 0 characters )
    • status (String, 1 characters ) 1
    • comment (String, 1 characters ) 2
    • promote (String, 1 characters ) 1
    • sticky (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • nid (String, 6 characters ) 148024
    • type (String, 17 characters ) drupalimc_article
    • language (String, 3 characters ) und
    • created (String, 10 characters ) 1558663521
    • changed (String, 10 characters ) 1558663521
    • tnid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • translate (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • revision_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1558663521
    • revision_uid (String, 3 characters ) 164
    • body (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 5 elements)
          • value (String, 9493 characters ) <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top...
            • <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><em>A press release for a press conference from the Police Accountability Board Alliance after being told by Council members that the legislation released in January would be amended. </em></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;">&nbsp;</p><p dir="ltr" id="docs-internal-guid-3c234d40-7fff-4b1a-dd69-4225430900c9" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:13.999999999999998pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">The Police Accountability Board Alliance Strongly Opposes City Council’s Proposed Changes to the PAB Legislation</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.2;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">When: </span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Tuesday, April 16, 2019, 5:15 p.m.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.2;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Where:</span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;"> City Hall steps, 30 Church Street, Rochester, NY 14614</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">At a community forum last week, City Councilmembers announced that they will consider amending the Police Accountability Board (PAB) legislation to allow former law enforcement officers on the PAB. The PAB Alliance, a coalition of more than 50 community organizations, strongly opposes this proposed amendment to the PAB legislation. The purpose of the PAB is to give community control of police oversight because the police cannot police themselves. To allow former law enforcement on the board, whether former Rochester Police Department (RPD) or from other departments, would undermine the function and legitimacy of the PAB. </span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">The PAB Alliance demands that City Council pass the legislation originally negotiated by City Council and the PAB Alliance, United Christian Leadership Ministry, and the Genesee Valley Chapter of the New York Civil Liberties Union. This negotiated legislation would create a PAB solely made up of civilian members, which is essential for a truly independent board. </span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">This negotiated legislation establishes an all-civilian board, with the five pillars, that would be amply prepared to review and adjudicate cases of police misconduct with direct input from members of the RPD:</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">1. Board members would be required to be trained in patterns, practices, policies, and procedures of the RPD along with relevant &nbsp;local, state, and federal law.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">2. RPD’s Professional Standards Section would conduct their own report on all cases of misconduct which the PAB would review.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">3. RPD officers accused of misconduct would be able to offer their own interpretation of RPD policy and training to the PAB. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">4. The Police Chief will give input on all misconduct cases and has the authority to compel the PAB to reconsider any case. </span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">5. The PAB would be able to request information from RPD officials to better understand RPD policy and training, just as a jury can consider expert testimony.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">These stipulations in the negotiated legislation allow for plenty of RPD involvement in the review process. Therefore, there is no need to have former law enforcement officers on the board.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Allowing former law enforcement officers on the PAB would create a lack of trust between the community and the PAB. The current oversight system is not trusted because RPD is expected to be final arbiters in the process. This proposed amendment would create the same situation. And given the requirement that PAB members be Rochester residents, it is unlikely that City Council will find former law enforcement officials who do not have some relationship with the RPD. For example, Monroe County Sheriff employees work closely with RPD, and thus their presence on the board would create a substantial risk of conflicts of interest.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Overall, the police have failed to hold themselves accountable which is why we need an independent PAB in the first place. We call on City Council to look past the misinformation and the delay tactics of the Locust Club. We encourage City Council listen to their constituents. We demand a PAB that prioritizes the community and empowers civilians. Vote on the negotiated PAB ordinance now!</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">###</span></p>
          • summary (String, 0 characters )
          • format (String, 9 characters ) full_html
          • safe_value (String, 9620 characters ) <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top...
            • <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><em>A press release for a press conference from the Police Accountability Board Alliance after being told by Council members that the legislation released in January would be amended. </em></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"> </p> <p dir="ltr" id="docs-internal-guid-3c234d40-7fff-4b1a-dd69-4225430900c9" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:</span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;text-align: center;"> </p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:13.999999999999998pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">The Police Accountability Board Alliance Strongly Opposes City Council’s Proposed Changes to the PAB Legislation</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.2;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">When: </span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Tuesday, April 16, 2019, 5:15 p.m.</span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.2;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:700;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Where:</span><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;"> City Hall steps, 30 Church Street, Rochester, NY 14614</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">At a community forum last week, City Councilmembers announced that they will consider amending the Police Accountability Board (PAB) legislation to allow former law enforcement officers on the PAB. The PAB Alliance, a coalition of more than 50 community organizations, strongly opposes this proposed amendment to the PAB legislation. The purpose of the PAB is to give community control of police oversight because the police cannot police themselves. To allow former law enforcement on the board, whether former Rochester Police Department (RPD) or from other departments, would undermine the function and legitimacy of the PAB. </span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">The PAB Alliance demands that City Council pass the legislation originally negotiated by City Council and the PAB Alliance, United Christian Leadership Ministry, and the Genesee Valley Chapter of the New York Civil Liberties Union. This negotiated legislation would create a PAB solely made up of civilian members, which is essential for a truly independent board. </span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">This negotiated legislation establishes an all-civilian board, with the five pillars, that would be amply prepared to review and adjudicate cases of police misconduct with direct input from members of the RPD:</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">1. Board members would be required to be trained in patterns, practices, policies, and procedures of the RPD along with relevant  local, state, and federal law.</span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">2. RPD’s Professional Standards Section would conduct their own report on all cases of misconduct which the PAB would review.</span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">3. RPD officers accused of misconduct would be able to offer their own interpretation of RPD policy and training to the PAB. </span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">4. The Police Chief will give input on all misconduct cases and has the authority to compel the PAB to reconsider any case. </span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;margin-left: 36pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">5. The PAB would be able to request information from RPD officials to better understand RPD policy and training, just as a jury can consider expert testimony.</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">These stipulations in the negotiated legislation allow for plenty of RPD involvement in the review process. Therefore, there is no need to have former law enforcement officers on the board.</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Allowing former law enforcement officers on the PAB would create a lack of trust between the community and the PAB. The current oversight system is not trusted because RPD is expected to be final arbiters in the process. This proposed amendment would create the same situation. And given the requirement that PAB members be Rochester residents, it is unlikely that City Council will find former law enforcement officials who do not have some relationship with the RPD. For example, Monroe County Sheriff employees work closely with RPD, and thus their presence on the board would create a substantial risk of conflicts of interest.</span></p> <p><br /><br /></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">Overall, the police have failed to hold themselves accountable which is why we need an independent PAB in the first place. We call on City Council to look past the misinformation and the delay tactics of the Locust Club. We encourage City Council listen to their constituents. We demand a PAB that prioritizes the community and empowers civilians. Vote on the negotiated PAB ordinance now!</span></p> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;color:#000000;background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre;white-space:pre-wrap;">###</span></p>
          • safe_summary (String, 0 characters )
    • field_drupalimc_categories (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 7 elements)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 16
        • 1 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 19
        • 2 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 10
        • 3 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 22
        • 4 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 37
        • 5 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 1 characters ) 9
        • 6 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 15
    • field_drupalimc_local_interest (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • value (String, 1 characters ) 1
    • field_drupalimc_migrated_images (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_gallery (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_author (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 3 elements)
          • value (String, 5 characters ) R-IMC
          • format (NULL)
          • safe_value (String, 5 characters ) R-IMC
    • rdf_mapping (Array, 9 elements)
      • rdftype (Array, 2 elements)
        • 0 (String, 9 characters ) sioc:Item
        • 1 (String, 13 characters ) foaf:Document
      • title (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 8 characters ) dc:title
      • created (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 2 elements)
          • 0 (String, 7 characters ) dc:date
          • 1 (String, 10 characters ) dc:created
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • changed (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 11 characters ) dc:modified
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • body (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 15 characters ) content:encoded
      • uid (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:has_creator
        • type (String, 3 characters ) rel
      • name (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 9 characters ) foaf:name
      • comment_count (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:num_replies
        • datatype (String, 11 characters ) xsd:integer
      • last_activity (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 23 characters ) sioc:last_activity_date
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
    • signature (String, 0 characters )
    • spaminess (Float) 0
    • cid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • last_comment_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1558663521
    • last_comment_name (NULL)
    • last_comment_uid (String, 3 characters ) 164
    • comment_count (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • name (String, 10 characters ) Knight0440
    • picture (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • data (String, 4 characters ) b:0;
  • Krumo version 0.2.1a
    | http://krumo.sourceforge.net
    Called from /home/members/rochindymedia/sites/rochester.indymedia.org/web/includes/menu.inc, line 527  

Search form

Local News

Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude
Hats off to Kropotkin!!
Agreement between the City of Rochester and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2016 - 2019
Facebook Posts Lead to Federal Rioting Charges for Justice for Daniel Prude Protester

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded