Skip to main content
  • IetpShops , Women's Clothing , Samsøe Samsøe Openwork body with long sleeves , adidas Bellista ruffle-trim long-sleeve T-shirt
  • Footwear NIKE - The React Infinity Run Flyknit 2 is one of Nikes most tested shoes - Men's shoes - Phantom Gt Academy Df Ic CW6668 090 Black/Black/Cyber - Football - Sports shoes , IetpShops
  • IetpShops® , adidas dh3169 sneakers girls , Men's Collection , Buy For Men On Sale Online
  • 160 - 2020 Air Jordan 11s Retro Low Concord Bred Men Sneakers AV2187 - personal AIR Jordans for Air Jordan
  • IetpShops , Australia , Short Synthetic Down Puffer Jacket by adidas Originals Online , adidas bk7840 black dress women boots
  • nike air jordan 1 mid unite totale white sneaker review
  • Air Jordan 4 GS Where The Wild Things Are DH0572 264 Release Date Price 4
  • air jordan 1 mid diamond shorts
  • air jordan 4 red urban camo custom
  • adidas yeezy boost 350 v2 salt
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Press Release: Police Accountability Board Alliance Urges City Council to Make Changes to PAB Legislation Public and Opposes Any Changes to Allow Police or Former Police on the PAB (May 2, 2019)

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
  • Devel
Submitted by R-IMC on Thu, 2019-05-23 21:39

On May 2, 2019, shortly before a 24 hour vigil was scheduled holding those impacted by police violence in Rochester, NY and calling on City Council to release their amendments to the legislation released in January, the Police Accountability Board Alliance held a press conference to make their demands heard.

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

 

Police Accountability Board Alliance Urges City Council to Make Changes to PAB Legislation Public and Opposes Any Changes to Allow Police or Former Police on the PAB



When: Thursday May 2, 2019, 5:00pm

Where: Steps of Main Entrance at City Hall, 30 Church St.

What: The Police Accountability Board Alliance (PABA) will have a press conference and then hold a 24-hour vigil outside of City Hall to honor those affected by police brutality and to oppose City Council allowing police or former police on the PAB.



The PABA requested City Council to publicly release the language for any amendments pertaining to the PAB legislation by Thursday, May 2, by 5:00pm, because the Alliance and the community needs time to consider any changes to the legislation well in advance of the the next City Council Committee Meeting on May 16th.



This week, City Council members revealed that they are considering changing the PAB legislation so that people with law enforcement experience would be allowed to serve on the PAB. One of the purposes of the PAB is to give oversight of police misconduct to the community because the police cannot police themselves. To allow former law enforcement on the board, whether former Rochester Police Department (RPD) or from other departments, would undermine the function, legitimacy, and independence of the PAB.



City Council also revealed that civilian employees of RPD will not be subject to review by the PAB. This further undermines the work of the PAB because civilian employees of RPD have significant powers and should be subject to the same process of review as sworn officers.



The community demands PAB legislation with a board composed of civilian, non-law enforcement members. This is an essential requirement for a truly independent board. However, this does not mean that the board would be isolated from communication with the RPD.



In at least five ways, the PAB would get direct input from members of the RPD on all police misconduct cases.

  1. Board members will be trained in patterns, practices, policies, and procedures of the RPD along with relevant  local, state, and federal law.

  2. The RPD’s Professional Standards Section will conduct their own investigation and send reports on all cases of misconduct to the PAB.

  3. RPD officers accused of misconduct will be able to offer their own interpretation of RPD policy and training to the PAB.

  4. The Police Chief has a right to give input on all misconduct cases heard by the PAB.

  5. The PAB will be able to request even more information from RPD officials to better understand RPD policy and training if a question arises, just as a jury can consider expert testimony.



These stipulations in the legislation allow the PAB to consider law enforcement’s perspective in the review process. Therefore, there is no need to have former law enforcement employees on the board. Further,  allowing current or former officers on the PAB creates a substantial risk of conflicts of interest and it erodes community trust.



While the Locust Club bemoans the fact that formerly incarcerated people can sit on the board, this is a requirement under New York State Law (Article 23-a of New York State Correction Law) and applies to any board. Their talking points emphasizing this point is an example of dog-whistle racism and further stigmatizes those who have such convictions and continues to punish them after they have served their time. Having a current or former police officer on the board is likely to discourage community members from bringing complaints and creates an atmosphere of mistrust, insofar as current or former police officers cannot be trusted to police themselves.



Overall, the PAB should be viewed as a jury. Just as we trust civilian jurors to consider expert evidence and make legal decisions, so too can a civilian PAB consider law enforcement’s perspective and make decisions while also maintaining independence.   



While the Locust Club claims that the PAB legislation is anti-police, this is just rhetoric. The PAB is not anti-police, it’s anti-police misconduct. The PAB prioritizes justice, transparency, and community trust.  This legislation is about sharing power with the community and providing real accountability when the constitutional and civil rights of people, predominantly of color, are violated.



###

 

Some photos from the vigil (photographer unknown) are in the gallery.

Police and Jails
Miscellaneous
Media
Theory and Information
Civil Liberties / Human Rights
Direct Action / Civil Disobedience
Elections / Legislation
Image Gallery: 
  • Facebook logo
  • Google logo
  • identi.ca logo
  • Twitter logo
  • Digg logo
  • del.icio.us logo
  • Reddit logo
  • StumbleUpon logo
  • Yahoo logo
  • Log in or register to post comments

Search form

Local News

Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude
Hats off to Kropotkin!!
Agreement between the City of Rochester and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2016 - 2019
Facebook Posts Lead to Federal Rioting Charges for Justice for Daniel Prude Protester

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded