Skip to main content
  • Sports shoes - Asphalt - nike jordan trunner kids boots clearance - IetpShops - Running shoes - nike air max 1 new york , Women's shoes
  • SBD , Meek Mill adidas Ultra Boost Triple Black , adidas Superstar Foundation "Core Black/White"
  • Facts, Nike Kobe 11 Elite Low Review 2023, Deals , CaribbeanpoultryShops, Nike Air Max Light Vintage White Midnight Navy-Neutral Grey
  • Where to Buy the Nike Dunk Low "Jackie Robinson" 2022 - StclaircomoShops - nike flyknit streak drop shoes size
  • best men nike air max plus 97 running shoes sku - Moccasins - Air Jordan 8 Retro Gs Big Kids Shoes Orange Pearl-pink , IetpShops - Men's shoes - Low shoes
  • air jordan 4 red urban camo custom
  • air jordan 1 mid diamond shorts
  • nike air jordan 1 mid unite totale white sneaker review
  • nike air jordan 4 white cement 2016 retro
  • air jordan 1 retro high og chicago on foot
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Press Statement from the Police Accountability Board Alliance (Sept. 17, 2018)

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
  • Devel
Submitted by R-IMC on Tue, 2018-09-25 11:49

The Police Accountability Board Alliance made the statement below on September 17, 2018 after reviewing the draft ordinance released by Rochester City Council:

Rochester City Council shared a draft of legislation for a Rochester Police Accountability Board with the Alliance recently. However, City Council’s draft fails to establish the five essential pillars of accountability that the Alliance has been demanding. The five essential pillars for an effective Police Accountability Board are:


    •    An independent agency of city government, separate from RPD
    •    The power to independently investigate complaints of police misconduct
    •    Subpoena power to compel the production of evidence and witnesses
    •    Disciplinary power using a disciplinary matrix
    •    The power to review and assess RPD patterns, practices, policies and procedures to recommend systemic changes in order to prevent future misconduct.


The Alliance has many problems with City Council’s draft legislation. Among the most glaring and obvious is that it significantly curtails the PAB’s independence, investigative power, and disciplinary power.

Specifically:
    1.    Council's draft does not give the PAB real disciplinary power, but rather it leaves final disciplinary power with the Chief of police, thereby maintaining the status quo. This is unacceptable.
    2.    The draft severely weakens the PAB's investigative power and allows the RPD to interview all witnesses prior to the PAB, even if the witness was assaulted by an officer. The draft also prevents the PAB from conducting an investigation and utilizing subpoena power until the Professional Standards Section investigation is concluded.
    3.    The draft does not give the community majority representation on the Board to ensure community control over complaints of misconduct, thus limiting the PAB's real independence. The Council’s draft calls for a 9 member board with 2 appointments from the mayor, 4 appointments from City Council, and 3 appointments from the community. The Alliance calls for an 11 member board with 1 appointment from the mayor, 4 appointments from City Council, and 6 appointments from the community.
    4.    The PAB is severely underfunded which will curtail the board’s ability to effectively and efficiently investigate and adjudicate complaints of police misconduct. Refusing to hire civilian investigators will likely lead to delays in investigations, while the officers in question remain on the force potentially posing a risk to the public.
    5.    Former RPD officers can be appointed on the board, which is likely to cause conflicts of interest and delays in investigations because of recusals, delegitimates the board in the eyes of the community, and could cause the board to become biased toward accused officers instead of reviewing each complaint critically. This inhibits the independence of the board from the RPD.\


The Alliance continues to demand a strong, efficient, and effective Police Accountability Board based on our five pillars. The Alliance will demonstrate and demand that City Council fix these and other problems with their draft legislation at the next City Council meeting, this Tuesday, September 18th, at 6:30 PM at City Hall.


The Alliance Executive Committee will bring these concerns directly to City Council at a meeting scheduled for September 20th.


The Alliance invites all those who support true accountability to attend the City Council meeting tomorrow in order to show that the Rochester community cares about this issue, and that we will not be silenced or thwarted from achieving a Police Accountability Board with substantive powers to hold officers and the department accountable.


Thank you.

Police and Jails
Protest / Resistance
Miscellaneous
Media
Theory and Information
Elections / Legislation
  • Facebook logo
  • Google logo
  • identi.ca logo
  • Twitter logo
  • Digg logo
  • del.icio.us logo
  • Reddit logo
  • StumbleUpon logo
  • Yahoo logo
  • Log in or register to post comments

Search form

Local News

Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude
Hats off to Kropotkin!!
Agreement between the City of Rochester and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2016 - 2019
Facebook Posts Lead to Federal Rioting Charges for Justice for Daniel Prude Protester

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded