David Graeber on political polarization

<p>original article: <a href="http://philebersole.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/david-graeber-on-political-polarization-2/">http://philebersole.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/david-graeber-on-political-polarization-2/</a></p><p style="text-align:left;"><a href="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/polarization.gif"><img alt="polarization" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-42160" src="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/polarization.gif?w=900&amp;h=694" height="347" width="450"></a></p><p style="text-align:left;">In the current government shutdown and bond default crisis, the extreme left-wing position, the one that House Speaker John Boehner says would amount to “unconditional surrender,” would be to allow the government to function normally and pay its bills under the “sequester” budget.&nbsp; This is the austerity budget proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan, which at the time a surrender to the priorities of the Republican right wing.</p><p style="text-align:left;"><!--break--></p><p style="text-align:left;">Candidate Barack Obama, writing in <em>The Audacity of Hope,</em> criticized liberal Democrats for failing to give Ronald Reagan credit for his good ideas.&nbsp; I should have paid more attention.&nbsp; What the Tea Party Republicans do is to give President Obama cover for protecting Wall Street and the military-intelligence complex.</p><p style="text-align:left;">I intend to post a review of David Graeber’s <em>The Democracy Project</em> sometime soon, but in the meantime, here is a good quote on what the word “conservative” has come to mean.</p><blockquote><p style="text-align:left;"><em><a href="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/dgc.jpg"><img alt="DGC" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-41504" src="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/dgc.jpg?w=448&amp;h=632" style="width: 104px; height: 150px; float: left;"></a>Nowadays in the United States at least, “conservative” has mainly come to be used for “right-wing radical,” while its long-standing literal meaning was “someone whose main political imperative is to conserve existing institutions, to protect the status quo.”</em></p><p style="text-align:left;"><em>This is precisely what Obama has turned out to be.&nbsp; Almost all his greatest political efforts have been aimed at preserving some institutional structure under threat: the banking system, the auto industry, even the health insurance industry.</em></p></blockquote><p style="text-align:left;">Not to mention the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon and their contractors.</p><blockquote><p style="text-align:left;"><em>In America today, “right” and “left” are ordinarily used to refer to Republicans and Democrats, two parties that basically represent different factions within the 1 percent—or perhaps, if one were to be extremely generous, the top 2 or 3 percent of the U.S. population [in income]. </em></p><p style="text-align:left;"><em>Wall Street, which owns both, seems equally divided between the two.&nbsp; Republicans, otherwise, represent the bulk of the remaining CEOs, particularly in the military and extractive industries (energy, mining, timber), and just about all the middle-rank businessmen; Democrats represent the upper echelons of what author and activist Barbara Ehrenreich once called “the professional-managerial class,” as well as pretty much everybody in academia and the entertainment industry.</em></p><p style="text-align:left;"><em>Certainly this is where each party’s money is coming from—and, increasingly, raising and spending money is all these parties really do.</em></p></blockquote><p style="text-align:left;">My Obamaphile friends rightly point out the delusions of the Tea Party Republicans, but they themselves are committed to the illusion that President Obama is a progressive who is on the side of the common people.</p>

<p>original article: <a href="http://philebersole.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/david-graeber-on-political-polarization-2/">http://philebersole.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/david-graeber-on-political-polarization-2/</a></p> <p style="text-align:left;"><a href="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/polarization.gif"><img alt="polarization" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-42160" src="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/polarization.gif?w=900&amp;h=694" height="347" width="450" /></a></p> <p style="text-align:left;">In the current government shutdown and bond default crisis, the extreme left-wing position, the one that House Speaker John Boehner says would amount to “unconditional surrender,” would be to allow the government to function normally and pay its bills under the “sequester” budget.  This is the austerity budget proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan, which at the time a surrender to the priorities of the Republican right wing.</p> <p style="text-align:left;"> <!--break--></p> <p style="text-align:left;">Candidate Barack Obama, writing in <em>The Audacity of Hope,</em> criticized liberal Democrats for failing to give Ronald Reagan credit for his good ideas.  I should have paid more attention.  What the Tea Party Republicans do is to give President Obama cover for protecting Wall Street and the military-intelligence complex.</p> <p style="text-align:left;">I intend to post a review of David Graeber’s <em>The Democracy Project</em> sometime soon, but in the meantime, here is a good quote on what the word “conservative” has come to mean.</p> <blockquote><p style="text-align:left;"><em><a href="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/dgc.jpg"><img alt="DGC" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-41504" src="http://philebersole.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/dgc.jpg?w=448&amp;h=632" style="width: 104px; height: 150px; float: left;" /></a>Nowadays in the United States at least, “conservative” has mainly come to be used for “right-wing radical,” while its long-standing literal meaning was “someone whose main political imperative is to conserve existing institutions, to protect the status quo.”</em></p> <p style="text-align:left;"><em>This is precisely what Obama has turned out to be.  Almost all his greatest political efforts have been aimed at preserving some institutional structure under threat: the banking system, the auto industry, even the health insurance industry.</em></p> </blockquote> <p style="text-align:left;">Not to mention the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon and their contractors.</p> <blockquote><p style="text-align:left;"><em>In America today, “right” and “left” are ordinarily used to refer to Republicans and Democrats, two parties that basically represent different factions within the 1 percent—or perhaps, if one were to be extremely generous, the top 2 or 3 percent of the U.S. population [in income]. </em></p> <p style="text-align:left;"><em>Wall Street, which owns both, seems equally divided between the two.  Republicans, otherwise, represent the bulk of the remaining CEOs, particularly in the military and extractive industries (energy, mining, timber), and just about all the middle-rank businessmen; Democrats represent the upper echelons of what author and activist Barbara Ehrenreich once called “the professional-managerial class,” as well as pretty much everybody in academia and the entertainment industry.</em></p> <p style="text-align:left;"><em>Certainly this is where each party’s money is coming from—and, increasingly, raising and spending money is all these parties really do.</em></p> </blockquote> <p style="text-align:left;">My Obamaphile friends rightly point out the delusions of the Tea Party Republicans, but they themselves are committed to the illusion that President Obama is a progressive who is on the side of the common people.</p>