Skip to main content
  • Jordan Future Bred652141-601 - 14 - air0000091 - Air Jordan Bags - Cheap Novogas Jordan Outlet
  • off white air jordan 1 canary yellow sample release date info
  • Sydney Thomas, Paul-Tyson ring girl, reacts to viral fame in hilarious video
  • nike air vortex black vintage boots , AspennigeriaShops , Cut in half: Nike Journey Run Review (2024)
  • nike dunk duck olive garden ohio city cleveland, Жилетка, жилетка nike — цена 2000 грн в каталоге Жилетки ✓ Купить мужские вещи по доступной цене на Шафе, осанка жилетка , Украина #131833407
  • air jordan 1 mid tartan swoosh
  • Womens Air Jordan 1 Denim DM9036 104 Release Date 4
  • Air Jordan 4 Military Black On Feet DH6927 111
  • saquon barkley nike air trainer iii DA5403 200 release date
  • adidas yeezy boost 350 v2 salt
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Zhibin Gu: emerging China entrepreneurship revolution vs Communist dynasty: history, politics, economy

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Devel(active tab)

Secondary tabs

  • Load(active tab)
  • Render
  • ... (Object) stdClass
    • vid (String, 4 characters ) 5561
    • uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • title (String, 102 characters ) Zhibin Gu: emerging China entrepreneurship revo...
      • Zhibin Gu: emerging China entrepreneurship revolution vs Communist dynasty: history, politics, economy
    • log (String, 0 characters )
    • status (String, 1 characters ) 1
    • comment (String, 1 characters ) 2
    • promote (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • sticky (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • nid (String, 4 characters ) 5561
    • type (String, 17 characters ) drupalimc_article
    • language (String, 3 characters ) und
    • created (String, 10 characters ) 1260256745
    • changed (String, 10 characters ) 1260256864
    • tnid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • translate (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • revision_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1260256864
    • revision_uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • body (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 5 elements)
          • value (String, 4511 characters ) Is China's surging economy sustainable? How cor...
            • Is China's surging economy sustainable? How corrupt is the Chinese Communist government? What is really inside Chinese society, finance, politics and international relations? Get great ideas from provocative commentator Zhibin Gu of World Association of International Studies at Stanford University. <!--break--> George Zhibin Gu summarizes the history of China's Communist Dynasty: (George Zhibin Gu of China is an author of several new books, including: 1. China's global reach, 2. China and the new world order, 3. Made in China.) The past 60 years of China's Communist history can be divided roughly into two phases. The first phase, between 1949 and 1978, was this: the Communist bureaucracy had totally destroyed society, the economy and the culture. This was done by a total bureaucratic monopoly over all of nation's wealth, labor, markets, organizations and institutions. Furthermore, it completely destroyed the free press and the law. But this unprecedented bureaucratic domination immediately produced unprecedented man-made disasters in world history, not just China's. The disasters include endless violence and terror, the creation of the state sector and people's communes, the total bureaucratization of media, education, and thought. In the end, beginning in 1958, the regime wanted to have a total bureaucratic miracle in the so-called Great Leap Forward (1958-60), and record disasters emerged all at once. Record deaths of some 50 million people occurred in the period of 1958-62, killing some 50 million people by an unprecedented famine as well as a record oganized violence. What is more, these unprecedented miseries turned out to be the very beginning of bureaucratic disasters. Worse than the famine, three bureaucratic wars emerged against society and the people in the period of 1959-78, which ended to destroy countless millions of lives, or even more, by organized violence, not to mention a near total destruction of culture, education, thinking, wealth and all other good things in life. The second phase took place beginning in 1979 when the reform started. In reality, the regime wants to maintain the traditional bureaucratic supremacy all the way. But things have changed unexpectedly, against the very scheme of the regime over the previous 30 years. Most significantly, three great things have aided the Chinese people to escape their bureaucratic cages: 1. The destruction of Mao's people's commune, which took place by the farmers' own initiative and giant efforts in the period of 1978-84. This act would free 900 million rural people from being trapped in the bureaucratic jungles. For example, farmers have been able to travel freely and work in cities since then, though there are countless man-made barriers still in place today, including a ban on free travel. 2. The unexpected re-rise of the domestic private sector, which has produced well over 50 million private businessmen and street vendors. Their rise means that people want to pursue their own interests and gain prosperity on their own efforts: they are no longer interested in being forced to be servants to the self-appointed bureaucracy. 3. The gradual opening and the rapid ongoing integration of China's economy with the outside world. Today, foreign companies control about 60% of China's international trade, employs over 25 million Chinese and take about one third of China's domestic economy. At the same time, China has risen to become the biggest trader in the world as of this year, in spite of the global financial crisis. Looking ahead over the next 30 years, the biggest forces will be of these three: entrepreneurship, open society, and global involvement, which would aid China's effort to become a law-based, truly modern society, free from bureaucratic intrusions, though the task remains mighty. For the same self-appointed, inherently self-serving bureaucracy remains in place today. What is more, the political foundations of this political body, the cults and terror, remain to be removed. Otherwise, any talk about a modern China would be empty. JE comments: I look forward to more &quot;Modern China at 60&quot; postings. My thanks to George Zhibin Gu for getting the ball rolling. -- For information about the World Association of International Studies (WAIS), and its online publication, the World Affairs Report, read its homepage by simply double-clicking on: http://wais.stanford.edu/ John Eipper, Editor-in-Chief, Adrian College, MI 49221 USA
          • summary (NULL)
          • format (String, 9 characters ) full_html
          • safe_value (String, 4649 characters ) <p>Is China's surging economy sustainable? How ...
            • <p>Is China's surging economy sustainable? How corrupt is the Chinese Communist government? What is really inside Chinese society, finance, politics and international relations? Get great ideas from provocative commentator Zhibin Gu of World Association of International Studies at Stanford University.</p> <!--break--><p> George Zhibin Gu summarizes the history of China's Communist Dynasty: </p> <p>(George Zhibin Gu of China is an author of several new books, including: 1. China's global reach, 2. China and the new world order, 3. Made in China.) </p> <p>The past 60 years of China's Communist history can be divided roughly into two phases. </p> <p>The first phase, between 1949 and 1978, was this: the Communist bureaucracy had totally destroyed society, the economy and the culture. This was done by a total bureaucratic monopoly over all of nation's wealth, labor, markets, organizations and institutions. Furthermore, it completely destroyed the free press and the law. But this unprecedented bureaucratic domination immediately produced unprecedented man-made disasters in world history, not just China's. The disasters include endless violence and terror, the creation of the state sector and people's communes, the total bureaucratization of media, education, and thought. </p> <p>In the end, beginning in 1958, the regime wanted to have a total bureaucratic miracle in the so-called Great Leap Forward (1958-60), and record disasters emerged all at once. Record deaths of some 50 million people occurred in the period of 1958-62, killing some 50 million people by an unprecedented famine as well as a record oganized violence. </p> <p>What is more, these unprecedented miseries turned out to be the very beginning of bureaucratic disasters. Worse than the famine, three bureaucratic wars emerged against society and the people in the period of 1959-78, which ended to destroy countless millions of lives, or even more, by organized violence, not to mention a near total destruction of culture, education, thinking, wealth and all other good things in life. </p> <p>The second phase took place beginning in 1979 when the reform started. In reality, the regime wants to maintain the traditional bureaucratic supremacy all the way. But things have changed unexpectedly, against the very scheme of the regime over the previous 30 years. Most significantly, three great things have aided the Chinese people to escape their bureaucratic cages: </p> <p>1. The destruction of Mao's people's commune, which took place by the farmers' own initiative and giant efforts in the period of 1978-84. This act would free 900 million rural people from being trapped in the bureaucratic jungles. For example, farmers have been able to travel freely and work in cities since then, though there are countless man-made barriers still in place today, including a ban on free travel. </p> <p>2. The unexpected re-rise of the domestic private sector, which has produced well over 50 million private businessmen and street vendors. Their rise means that people want to pursue their own interests and gain prosperity on their own efforts: they are no longer interested in being forced to be servants to the self-appointed bureaucracy. </p> <p>3. The gradual opening and the rapid ongoing integration of China's economy with the outside world. Today, foreign companies control about 60% of China's international trade, employs over 25 million Chinese and take about one third of China's domestic economy. At the same time, China has risen to become the biggest trader in the world as of this year, in spite of the global financial crisis. </p> <p>Looking ahead over the next 30 years, the biggest forces will be of these three: entrepreneurship, open society, and global involvement, which would aid China's effort to become a law-based, truly modern society, free from bureaucratic intrusions, though the task remains mighty. For the same self-appointed, inherently self-serving bureaucracy remains in place today. What is more, the political foundations of this political body, the cults and terror, remain to be removed. Otherwise, any talk about a modern China would be empty. </p> <p>JE comments: I look forward to more "Modern China at 60" postings. My thanks to George Zhibin Gu for getting the ball rolling. </p> <p>-- </p> <p>For information about the World Association of International Studies<br /> (WAIS), and its online publication, the World Affairs Report, read its<br /> homepage by simply double-clicking on: <a href="http://wais.stanford.edu/">http://wais.stanford.edu/</a> </p> <p>John Eipper, Editor-in-Chief, Adrian College, MI 49221 USA</p>
          • safe_summary (String, 0 characters )
    • field_drupalimc_categories (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 1 characters ) 3
    • field_drupalimc_local_interest (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • value (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • field_drupalimc_migrated_images (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_gallery (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_author (Array, 0 elements)
    • rdf_mapping (Array, 9 elements)
      • rdftype (Array, 2 elements)
        • 0 (String, 9 characters ) sioc:Item
        • 1 (String, 13 characters ) foaf:Document
      • title (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 8 characters ) dc:title
      • created (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 2 elements)
          • 0 (String, 7 characters ) dc:date
          • 1 (String, 10 characters ) dc:created
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • changed (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 11 characters ) dc:modified
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • body (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 15 characters ) content:encoded
      • uid (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:has_creator
        • type (String, 3 characters ) rel
      • name (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 9 characters ) foaf:name
      • comment_count (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:num_replies
        • datatype (String, 11 characters ) xsd:integer
      • last_activity (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 23 characters ) sioc:last_activity_date
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
    • signature (String, 0 characters )
    • spaminess (Float) 0
    • cid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • last_comment_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1328067715
    • last_comment_name (NULL)
    • last_comment_uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • comment_count (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • name (String, 0 characters )
    • picture (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • data (NULL)
  • Krumo version 0.2.1a
    | http://krumo.sourceforge.net
    Called from /home/members/rochindymedia/sites/rochester.indymedia.org/web/includes/menu.inc, line 527  

Search form

Local News

“Family Trouble”: The 1975 Killing of Denise Hawkins and the Legacy of Deadly Force in the Rochester, NY Police Department
CBA between the City of Rochester, NY and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 1974 - 1976
CBA between the City of Rochester & the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2019 - 2024
Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded