Skip to main content
  • air jordan 1 mid outlet
  • muzhskie krossovki nike jordan why not zero 2 seryj zheltyj - Jordan Reveal Photo Blue - these jordan 1 mid gs boast a flash of colour on the heel
  • kaws yeezy lacing back to print Vs. Asics Superblast 2 , adidas albrecht spezial women black hair care , adidas spezial primeknit ebay sale items - Between 2 Shoes
  • dolce gabbana portofino lace up sneakers item
  • Air Jordans, Release Dates & More - Cheap Ida-step Jordan Outlet , Sneaker News Presents: A History of Carmelo Anthony's Jordan Brand Signature Shoes - The heels of The Shoe Surgeon s custom Air Jordan 1 Chicago
  • air jordan 1 retro high og chicago on foot
  • Why So Sad Nike SB Dunk Low DX5549 400 On Feet
  • nike air jordan 1 mid unite totale white sneaker review
  • air jordan 4 red urban camo custom
  • Air Jordan 1 Mid Tie Dye DM1200 001 Release Date 4
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Banks Injure Economic Stimulus Plan by Jacking up Credit Card Interest

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Devel(active tab)

Secondary tabs

  • Load(active tab)
  • Render
  • ... (Object) stdClass
    • vid (String, 4 characters ) 4746
    • uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • title (String, 70 characters ) Banks Injure Economic Stimulus Plan by Jacking ...
      • Banks Injure Economic Stimulus Plan by Jacking up Credit Card Interest
    • log (String, 0 characters )
    • status (String, 1 characters ) 1
    • comment (String, 1 characters ) 2
    • promote (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • sticky (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • nid (String, 4 characters ) 4746
    • type (String, 17 characters ) drupalimc_article
    • language (String, 3 characters ) und
    • created (String, 10 characters ) 1233896669
    • changed (String, 10 characters ) 1234226972
    • tnid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • translate (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • revision_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1234226972
    • revision_uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • body (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 5 elements)
          • value (String, 3996 characters ) Could banks jacking up credit card interest dur...
            • Could banks jacking up credit card interest during a horrendous recession—delay U.S. economic recovery and destroy the expected benefits of the Economic Stimulus Plan? <!--break--> Millions of Americans now face the prospect of their own economic collapse. As the recession worsens, Americans increasingly can’t pay their credit cards, rent and mortgage payments. Despite these hardships, recently several U.S. banks and credit card issuers—largely jacked up interest rates they charge credit card customers. Consequently it should be expected the large hikes in interest will further choke consumer spending and cause a new surge of credit card defaults and home foreclosures? During the 1930’s banks inflamed Americans and the Great Depression by similarly raising consumer interest rates that forced millions of people and businesses to default on loans. Houses could not be sold. Perhaps Americans in 2009 should ask Congress ASP, “Could banks jacking up credit card interest during a horrendous recession—delay U.S. economic recovery and destroy the expected benefits of the Economic Stimulus Plan?” Congress has proposed spending billions of taxpayer dollars to pay for an Economic Stimulus Plan to create jobs, generate bank lending and stimulate consumer spending. How could any Economic Stimulus Plan be expected to succeed if Congress doesn’t act to limit the rate of interest banks charge credit card purchasers? During these bad economic times credit card lenders need to be limited to twelve percent. The current high credit card interest rates discourage consumers from making card purchases at retail and other businesses that would help stimulate economic recovery. Unless credit card interest rates are strictly regulated, credit card issuers could become the main recipient of the Economic Stimulus Plan, sucking up stimulus dollars from Americans forced to pay higher credit card interest on debts they incurred prior. Here we go again? U.S. banks are duplicating in part through credit card lending some of the same problems that caused the sub-prime mortgage collapse and real estate crash. Except this time, U.S. banks aren’t selling packages of so-called mortgaged-backed securities to investors; the banks are selling “credit cardholder debt” to investors. Under this operation, after the bank sells a credit card holder’s debt at a specific interest rate, the selling bank can keep raising the cardholder’s interest rate—keeping part of the higher interest charged: the bank will have little or no exposure for the sold debt. The bank can also profit from subsequent fees charged the credit card holder. This operation gives the bank little or no incentive to lower the credit card holder’s interest rate after they have raised it. Sound familiar? Do the words Sub-Prime Mortgage come to mind? Sub-prime mortgages sold by banks to investors, were frequently defaulted on by borrowers because they could not pay higher interest rates provided for in mortgage loan agreements. At least purchasers of Sub-Prime loans had real estate to secure the mortgages. “Credit card debts sold by banks” generally provide debt-investors with only the debtor to look to for repayment. Banks selling credit card debt to investors has the potential of becoming a scheme that could cost U.S. taxpayers and the global economy billions. Congress needs to limit fees and interest rates banks can charge credit card holders. That would eliminate much of the incentive for banks to resell a credit card’s debt then keep raising interest rate on the credit card. Meanwhile while U.S. banks continue to Jack Up your credit card interest, keep in mind these are some of the same financial institutions that failed to sufficiently provide the U.S. Government with an accounting explaining how they spent billions of “bailout dollars” provided by U.S. Taxpayers.
          • summary (NULL)
          • format (String, 9 characters ) full_html
          • safe_value (String, 4032 characters ) <p>Could banks jacking up credit card interest ...
            • <p>Could banks jacking up credit card interest during a horrendous recession—delay U.S. economic recovery and destroy the expected benefits of the Economic Stimulus Plan?</p> <!--break--><p>Millions of Americans now face the prospect of their own economic collapse. As the recession worsens, Americans increasingly can’t pay their credit cards, rent and mortgage payments. Despite these hardships, recently several U.S. banks and credit card issuers—largely jacked up interest rates they charge credit card customers. Consequently it should be expected the large hikes in interest will further choke consumer spending and cause a new surge of credit card defaults and home foreclosures? During the 1930’s banks inflamed Americans and the Great Depression by similarly raising consumer interest rates that forced millions of people and businesses to default on loans. Houses could not be sold. Perhaps Americans in 2009 should ask Congress ASP, “Could banks jacking up credit card interest during a horrendous recession—delay U.S. economic recovery and destroy the expected benefits of the Economic Stimulus Plan?”</p> <p>Congress has proposed spending billions of taxpayer dollars to pay for an Economic Stimulus Plan to create jobs, generate bank lending and stimulate consumer spending. How could any Economic Stimulus Plan be expected to succeed if Congress doesn’t act to limit the rate of interest banks charge credit card purchasers? During these bad economic times credit card lenders need to be limited to twelve percent. The current high credit card interest rates discourage consumers from making card purchases at retail and other businesses that would help stimulate economic recovery. Unless credit card interest rates are strictly regulated, credit card issuers could become the main recipient of the Economic Stimulus Plan, sucking up stimulus dollars from Americans forced to pay higher credit card interest on debts they incurred prior.</p> <p>Here we go again? U.S. banks are duplicating in part through credit card lending some of the same problems that caused the sub-prime mortgage collapse and real estate crash. Except this time, U.S. banks aren’t selling packages of so-called mortgaged-backed securities to investors; the banks are selling “credit cardholder debt” to investors. Under this operation, after the bank sells a credit card holder’s debt at a specific interest rate, the selling bank can keep raising the cardholder’s interest rate—keeping part of the higher interest charged: the bank will have little or no exposure for the sold debt. The bank can also profit from subsequent fees charged the credit card holder. This operation gives the bank little or no incentive to lower the credit card holder’s interest rate after they have raised it. Sound familiar? Do the words Sub-Prime Mortgage come to mind? Sub-prime mortgages sold by banks to investors, were frequently defaulted on by borrowers because they could not pay higher interest rates provided for in mortgage loan agreements. At least purchasers of Sub-Prime loans had real estate to secure the mortgages. “Credit card debts sold by banks” generally provide debt-investors with only the debtor to look to for repayment.</p> <p>Banks selling credit card debt to investors has the potential of becoming a scheme that could cost U.S. taxpayers and the global economy billions. Congress needs to limit fees and interest rates banks can charge credit card holders. That would eliminate much of the incentive for banks to resell a credit card’s debt then keep raising interest rate on the credit card.</p> <p>Meanwhile while U.S. banks continue to Jack Up your credit card interest, keep in mind these are some of the same financial institutions that failed to sufficiently provide the U.S. Government with an accounting explaining how they spent billions of “bailout dollars” provided by U.S. Taxpayers.</p>
          • safe_summary (String, 0 characters )
    • field_drupalimc_categories (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 2 characters ) 26
    • field_drupalimc_local_interest (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • value (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • field_drupalimc_migrated_images (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_gallery (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_author (Array, 0 elements)
    • rdf_mapping (Array, 9 elements)
      • rdftype (Array, 2 elements)
        • 0 (String, 9 characters ) sioc:Item
        • 1 (String, 13 characters ) foaf:Document
      • title (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 8 characters ) dc:title
      • created (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 2 elements)
          • 0 (String, 7 characters ) dc:date
          • 1 (String, 10 characters ) dc:created
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • changed (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 11 characters ) dc:modified
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • body (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 15 characters ) content:encoded
      • uid (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:has_creator
        • type (String, 3 characters ) rel
      • name (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 9 characters ) foaf:name
      • comment_count (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:num_replies
        • datatype (String, 11 characters ) xsd:integer
      • last_activity (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 23 characters ) sioc:last_activity_date
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
    • signature (String, 0 characters )
    • spaminess (Float) 0
    • cid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • last_comment_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1328067715
    • last_comment_name (NULL)
    • last_comment_uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • comment_count (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • name (String, 0 characters )
    • picture (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • data (NULL)
  • Krumo version 0.2.1a
    | http://krumo.sourceforge.net
    Called from /home/members/rochindymedia/sites/rochester.indymedia.org/web/includes/menu.inc, line 527  

Search form

Local News

“Family Trouble”: The 1975 Killing of Denise Hawkins and the Legacy of Deadly Force in the Rochester, NY Police Department
CBA between the City of Rochester, NY and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 1974 - 1976
CBA between the City of Rochester & the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2019 - 2024
Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded