Skip to main content
  • Adidas Adidas Sports Resort Club Sweater , Украина #174050986 , Футболные шорты adidas real madrid🔥 — цена 350 грн в каталоге Спортивные шорты ✓ Купить мужские вещи по доступной цене на Шафе
  • Buy Women's Boots Red Lunar Footwear Online , jordan air jordan 1 mid crimson tint sneakers item , AspennigeriaShops
  • AR0038 - Air Jordan Super.Fly MVP PF 'White' , 100 - The outsole of the Air Jordan 5 Low Doernbecher Freestyle - JmksportShops
  • adidas Samba Sizing: How Do They Fit? , adidas nebzed k eh2542 negras , IetpShops
  • NovogasShops - las jordan lifestyle graphic duffel - Air las jordan Retro 6 'Jungle Tiger' Customs by V.A.B.
  • nike air max 1 travis scott cactus jack baroque brown do9392 200
  • saquon barkley nike air trainer iii DA5403 200 release date
  • Nike SB Dunk high premium doom sneaker talk
  • Why So Sad Nike SB Dunk Low DX5549 400 On Feet
  • air jordan 4 bred black cement 2019 308497 060 release date
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

CultureJamCleveland

Primary tabs

  • View(active tab)
  • Devel

IF ReckLess Regard, Haste, Blind Eyes Callously Accept Illegal
Votes, Then Senators have Sanctioned Rank Criminality and DOOM the
Western Jurisprudence Tradition to a Dark and Dreadful VOID.

IN Bush V Gore 2000 Justice Breyer's reading of the law gives a convincing argument for Senators, Duty Bound by their Oath of office, to Object to Illegal Votes. Public servants must be committed to defend and protect All citizen's rights, well-being and promises to live withIn and Uphold Constitutional Law. We expect and deserve Open and Fair Due-process respecting equal justice under the law, absolutely crucial with wide disparities of wealth in this country too willing to dominate with undue influence. Justice Breyer, "The legislative history of the Act makes clear its intent to commit
the power to resolve such disputes to Congress, rather than the
courts: "The two Houses are, by the Constitution, authorized to
make the count of electoral votes.
They can only count legal votes, and in doing so must determine,
from the best evidence to be had, what are legal votes .... The
power to determine rests with the two Houses, and there is no other
constitutional tribunal." Doesn't this read, there is no requirement of evidence, of which there is an awesome abundance, but only the requirement of a compelling argument? IS Not the refusal to open log books, resistance to rationally consider the data, anomolies, honest, good-faith efforts to weigh the evidence, obstruction of recounts, ducking of subpoenas, unexalted dismissal of court cases on technicalities- fearing merit, covering up by the partisan CorpMedia by avoidance, attack pieces AND election officials hiding by refusing to answer citizen and congressional inquiry's, IN and Of ITSELF the Trashing of Due-process? and ample cause for dubious suspicion of motives and reasonable doubt, AND if NOT SEEN, then we might mistakenly tread into uncharted legal no-mans-land from which without a proper, learned, careful debate NOW, MayBe very difficult to extract our selves from, as more AmeriCANs continue to awake and do their HomeWork & stand to SAVE everything that matters to live with & under a banner of True Freedom for ALL! The Media is proving too arrogant and powerful to police itself or adhere to Public ethics & journalistic standards. They helped sell a war sentencing the military to a dubious, disastrous deadly conflagaration. Now as a result we had expected and are ready for with Election2004, moves on in the process, they are aiding in an orchestrated state secret, the cover-up of Democracy being Deliberately forsaken and currently bleeding to death with out listening to the doctors, calling the police or honoring The public's concern and common voice. Do Not try to buy The Vote!
Our VOTE is NOT For Sale! PROSECUTE the Media for selling a NO Due-Process climate.
We are speaking for Ideals and Future Generations, please listen and answer and heed this Clarion Call, we are looking you right in the eye on January 6th, search deep and do your best we will decide if you were right and honest, bear notice.
WithOut Due-Process. Inaugaration is VOID. We Have Had ENOUGH of Living With and Under LIES! Let US help Clean House.




Post Contents=




1)recent most crucial essays understanding and appreciating the gravity and magnitude of this Historic WaterShed MoMent




2) Site with list of effective arguments for Objection




3)documentation video of Columbus Count EVERY VOTE Rally Jan.3




4)Random slogans and Healthy Meme-shares from CultureJamCleveland




5) links to other VoterGate reports by CultureJamCleveland


*****




1)this MasterFull essay does a lexis-nexis search on - election fraud-
and finds 1000 on Ukraine and 177 on Ohio, of which all but 10 were
DISmissive.




January 3, 2005 -- The Cleveland Federation of Labor is sending
busloads of demonstrators to a rally in Columbus, Ohio, today to take
part in a protest of election fraud in the 2004 presidential election.
As detailed below, there is strong evidence of vote theft in Ohio. But
to anyone who gets their news from a television or from most print
media, these protesters are kidding themselves or kidding the rest of
us, but certainly they are not onto anything worthy of investigation.
Last week I received this Email from the Columbus Dispatch:




"Dear Mr. Swanson:


"You say the rally is to protest the fraud that took place in the
election. Where did this fraud occur? Who did it? How did they do it?


"Thanx,


"glenn sheller, editorial page editor"




Two months after the election, an editor at ground zero was (seriously
or sarcastically) asking a stranger and an amateur to tell him from
Washington where the fraud had occurred. I immediately sent him a
reply.1 And I didn't hear anything further.




(Dave's reply)


1 Glenn Sheller,


If you're serious, I'm very glad you asked.


To get started, I would recommend reading the Ohio section of this report


http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/dfiles/file_477.pdf

and the following letters from Congressman John Conyers of Michigan to


Triad, to Sec. of State Blackwell, and to prosecutors:


Letter to Blackwell, his response, and follow-up letter:


http://ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=

Triad letter:


http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/triadltr122204.pdf

followup letter:


http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/triadfollowupltr122304.pdf

related video:


http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/122404X.shtml

letter to federal prosecutors:


http://ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=

and this article by the director of the National Voting Rights Institute:


http://ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=

Would you like me to ask PFAW and NVRI and Conyers' office to send you press


releases in the future? Can I get you any additional information or put you


in touch with any of the organizations involved?


If the above does NOT look to you like reasonable cause to follow the GAO's


advice and investigate, please let me know what level of breakdown and


corruption would interest you.


You know, there are a lot of wacky theories out there, but there are always


dead-ends in a trial and error investigation, especially one done by


grassroots activists without assistance from professional journalists. And


there is so much distrust, that the insane can begin to look plausible. But


the serious evidence of wrongdoing here has mounted so high, that a


continued refusal to acknowledge it will only increase public skepticism and


distrust. Next time around will be worse. Protecting democracy requires


eternal vigilance, and part of eternity is this moment right here. Don't


worry about who you think won or who conceded. That's two people. Worry


about the thousands who tried to vote and had their votes not counted.


Think from their point of view and you'll be on track, in my opinion.


Best,


David Swanson


(snippet)




What about actual coverage of what the "theories" are about and what in
them is solidly proven, what's speculative, what's disproved? Any of
that? Wouldn't a conspiracy theory go away more quickly if you refuted
it than if you avoided it and called it names? Hasn't over half the
country stopped believing in the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq()
after only minimal discussion of the evidence and acknowledgement by
the media that there weren't any weapons there?




A Media Blackout: Media Whites Out Vote Fraud


go=
http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&

*****




1a)"Crime of November 2": The human side of how Bush stole Ohio, and why Congress must investigate




1/5/2005


The Free Press


by Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman


(snippet)




The right-wing media assault on those who would mount this challenge
has been withering. The Ohio Republican Party says Rep. Tubbs-Jones
will "make a fool of herself" if she supports the effort. GOP
functionaries have filled the major media with charges of "conspiracy
theories" and "irresponsibility" among those who would question the
vote.




But all Americans committed to real democracy must stand in awe of this challenge.




It's more than ironic that this unelected administration has portrayed
itself as a defender of democracy in helping overturn an election in
Ukraine based on discrepancies between exit polls and a fraudulent vote
count. Doing the same here would deny George W. Bush the White House.




It's also ironic that an apparently defeated Republican candidate for
governor in the state of Washington is now calling for a revote to
overturn a recount. We support that demand, and ask the same for Ohio.




It's beyond tragic that this administration is now shedding untold
quantities of blood in Iraq in the name of a democracy that is being
denied here.




go=
http://nov2truth.org/article.php?story=20050105105205662



1b) Statement Of John C. Bonifaz Before The Rally For The Republic, Faneuil Hall, Boston


1/3/2005


General Counsel for the National Voting Rights Institute


(snippet)




Four years ago last month, the United States Supreme Court stopped the
vote counting in the State of Florida and, for the first time, selected
the president of the United States. It marked a dark moment in our
nation's history.


Since that time, people throughout this country committed to the vision
of democracy pledged to never let it happen again, never again would we
allow an individual to assume the power of the presidency without the
proper counting of all the votes. We are here tonight because we are
dangerously close to allowing it to happen again. We are here tonight
because we refuse to be silent.




On December 13, 2004, in the state capitol of Ohio, we witnessed a
crime, a crime against democracy, a crime against the right to vote, a
crime against our Constitution. On that day, Ohio Secretary of State J.
Kenneth Blackwell presided over a meeting over a group of individuals
who claimed to have won the right to serve as presidential electors for
the State of Ohio in the Electoral College. Mr. Blackwell and that
group gathered while a recount began of the votes cast in Ohio for
President of the United States.




Mr. Blackwell has done everything in his power to push through a slate
of electors based on an untested, initial count. In enacting its
recount law, the Ohio legislature ensured that a proper counting of all
the votes could include a recount. As candidates for the office of
President of the United States, David Cobb and Michael Badnarik
exercised their right under the law and sought a recount.




Mr. Blackwell had no right to convene a meeting of the Electoral
College in Ohio while a recount was underway. And individuals who ran
as candidates for presidential electors had no right to cast votes in
the Electoral College in Ohio while a recount was underway.




go=
http://nov2truth.org/article.php?story=20050103190905719



1c) Judiciary Cmte. Report Clearly


Questioning Bush Reelection


(snippet)




A status report of the House Judiciary Committee investigating the U.S.
presidential election, has questioned the certainty of the reelection
of president George Bush, based on irregularities in the Ohio contest.




Citing recent election controversy in Washington State and in the
"apparent defeat of the opposition leader Victor Yushchenko" in the
Ukraine, the report says these contexts show that elections "...are
subject to manipulation and mistake."




go=
http://www.breakfornews.com/articles/ElectionOutcomeUncertain.htm



1d)Re-Vote Ohio! by Ted Glick


(snippet)

Our next
governor should enter office without any doubt about the legitimacy of
his or her office. The people of Washington deserve to know that their
governor was elected fair and square. Unfortunately, the events of the
past few weeks now make it impossible for you or me to take office on
January 12 without being shrouded in suspicion.




-Dino Rossi, Republican candidate for Governor of Washington, in open
letter to Democratic candidate Christine Gregoire Rossi�s argument is
equally applicable to the Presidential election. Following an extremely
flawed and probably illegal �recount� in Ohio, no one can say for sure
who won that state�s 20 Electoral College votes, and these 20 votes are
necessary for either George Bush or John Kerry to claim a victory in
the 2004 election.




Most importantly, however, the Ohio recount has led us to a conclusion
that should be obvious to fair-minded people of any political party:




no one can claim victory in a contest when the score-keeping system was broken.




go=
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=6944







2)How to use these Talking Points


This document is available in HTML, PDF, or MS Word format at
http://jan6points.org.



This document is intended to assist you in arguing that it is a moral
imperative for all Members of Congress to take a stand and object to
the presidential electors from Ohio, Florida, and other states. It is
prepared for citizen-lobbyist who will have face-to-face meetings (most
likely with staff members) to convey their concerns and those of
millions of others.




We have found that there is no sufficient substitute for in-person
dialog, which allows you to directly contradict the many
rationalizations and excuses given for inaction, particularly regarding
this matter.




We recommend that you internalize the content in these talking points
as best you can, as it is difficult to control a conversation or
anticipate which specific topics will be most useful in your case.




We have found that the most effective tactic is to engage the meeting
participant in a back and forth exchange -- starting with eliciting
their concerns. Ask them directly why their boss has not already joined
with those like Rev. Jackson and Rep. Conyers. Should they not be
forthcoming, you can interject some of the rationalizations below by
saying "others have claimed that..."




The points are categorized as Informational, Argumentative, or
Political/Strategic but this arrangement connotes no hierarchy of
importance or effectiveness. Every situation is unique and you may have
the opportunity to use many or few of these points in your effort.




For questions, comments, or more help just contact us at thedeanpeople (at) comcast.net




Informational Points -- to satisfy queries and combat honest ignorance




� An election is not a contest -- it is a survey -- an effort to measure an objective reality. (See Note2 below)



Elections are intended to measure the will of the people, not the
will of the candidates; therefore, it does not matter if a candidate
has conceded.



It is the affirmative DUTY of each and every Member of Congress to
personally judge the validity of presidential electors based on any
information they have at hand. Yes, they apparently need to be told
this. (See Note1 below)



Each Senator/Rep is Constitutionally charged with the burden of
being the backstop or safety valve for an election procedure that has
rendered an invalid result



States have no "right" to have electoral votes counted and many
slates of electors have been disallowed in the past -- particularly
after the Civil War



The Voting Rights Act makes it unlawful for minorities to receive
disparate treatment by any election process -- no willful or negligent
act need be found to have occurred -- a disparate circumstance or
result is sufficient for violation.




In 2001 the US Commission on Civil Rights made a legal finding of just
such a violation in regard to the Florida election - undisputed
evidence of poll-tax-lines and registration process violations makes
clear that there has not been a correction of this finding



If a state's election laws includes a contest provision, that
state's election is not lawfully completed unless and until such
contests have been disposed of judicially




Argumentative Points -- to counter unfounded rationalizations, excuses, and fears




What is being asked of the official is a simple question:




"Are hours-long poll-tax-lines for poor minority voters and none for
affluent white voters a tolerable condition for you personally?"




Yes, strong stuff. But necessary stuff if we're going to secure our right to have confidence in free and fair elections.




No unlawful election process can lawfully certify electors




Objecting is the best action they can take to advance the general cause of "Election Reform"




Objecting to electors, successfully or not, creates a "consequence" for the failures of the system.




A traffic light rarely gets built until someone is killed or injured.
Only after 9/11 did Congress seriously address anti-terrorism.




The same is true here and an objection makes it clear to citizens in
every state that they must enact reforms and make the investments
necessary their state may be denied the privilege of participating in
the Electoral College.




We The People, through our representatives, have set out our election laws to ensure that election results reflect OUR will




Our law is intended to serve our will, not thwart it. We can never
again allow "technical" or "legal" arguments and rationalizations to
trump reality as we did in 2000.




When the results of an election are in doubt, the moral burden is on the states to prove the results to be sound.




The People have an inalienable right to full confidence in the results.




go=
http://www.unioncountyfordemocracy.org/files/jan6points.html



*****


3)The January 3 pro-Democracy Rally at Capitol Theatre In Columbus
featuring Jesse Jackson, David Cobb, Ohio Rep. Sheila Tubbs-Jones, Tim
Carpenter of the PDA, Theresa Fedor of Ohio Senate among others!




go=
http://www.madogmusic.com/sites/ranch/html/fra_menu_election.htm



*****


4)Enomy? = Money?


People First in The 21st!




Our VOTE is NOT For Sale




No Privatizing of The Vote




Vote Zealots?


what no Zeal for Democracy?




The People are reporting for Duty




The People are coming! The People are Coming!! THE PEOPLE ARE CARING




Where? OH Where Has the Media gone? OH where Oh where, can they BE?


I used to read and watch all day long


NOW they have given-up on me


they really could care if we stay free!




STEAL OUR Vote? STEAL Our Future!




Cover-up using mass-hypnosis campaign and head-space for rent corporate-appartchick propagandists




E Pluribus Unum (out of Many ONE)




American Voter Republican- in that order




Skull and Bones?


Bowls and Scones




cuckoo's nest Media




Bush should get, while the gettin' s Good




Media Rush to Judgement




We are fighting for the true outcome




America shall not reward criminal conduct




1 Rule for Them another for us




There are more of us than there are of them




No Records No Election




Refuse to Live with a Lie




Resist the Privatizing of Truth




more votes than voters




PlutoCrats did NOT give their Mom's The Right to Vote till 1920!




Very telling- EVERY irregularity favors Republicans




Newsmen: paid to sell death




PROSECUTE the Media




Big Dough=Status Quo




Cheney will be doing the gaveling this time, when Sen. Leahy objects will Dick tell him to GO F__K himself!




America needs to GET DOWN off it's ethnocentric HighHorse, ReNounce
it's unnessecary claims of number 1 status, mind it's own business,
Come Home, and REBUILD and Tend needs here at HOME




BlueBloods Bleed Greed without Heed


TrueBloods FEED Needs Adhere to CREEDS




Trusting IN the UNofficial Web of SMILES


*****




5)


Must! Do NOW !-1 Focus 1 Mission 1 Goal 1 RESULT=NewVote by J20


author: CultureJamCleveland




HOW DARE THEE? Democracy IS Deliberately Criminally, Hastily being
frog-marched to the GallOWs. Adding insult to injury it's Horribly
OutRageous that, Insidiously it is AN OFFICIAL State-Secret! The powers
that be have coldly calculated that America and Americans will lie to
themselves, tell themselves lies and Live with a Lie. For the most part
they may be right, many are physically & emotionally energy-sapped,
distracted, conTrolled, apathetic, demoralized and even Zombified. Many
millions though, are ascending to that MounTain Top where the view is
so grand, omnicient and the scent wafting from the grounds of our
election system, smells FOUL with falseness, fraud and an unholy
alliance of corporations, judges and elected? officials AND money
twisting, unsportsmanlike a process requiring fairness, transparency,
integrity into an abomination- a crime syndicate having undue control
of the Public and Human right to Vote. The basic Way to petition Our
Servant, elected governments, for a redress of grievances. This Liberty
Lover has written a Paul Revere-esque chain letter, a powerful
invocation to Clot the Bleeding Wound inflicted by a felonius assault
on Democracy. We will NOT or canNot Live with a comfortable, despicable
LIE....




go=
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/01/307146.shtml



*****




Announcement :: Protest Activity


HELP! EveryDay AmeriCAN Heroes URgently Needed for Duty-Defending...




by CultureJamCleveland


30 Dec 2004




...a


Just Future & Constitutional Self-GOvernance


---TIME for All Concerned Citizens to report for Historic Duty and


STAND Up with courageous resolve & vigilance -For We are on-the-cusp of


redemption, my friends! Ballots? SchMallots! We NEED to Vote NOW,


with our voices, eyes,ears and feet in this New Year.


Get Ready for 1/3/05 to 1/6/05. Join


in this dynamic FLASH! SmartMob MoveMent in spirited Defense of


genuine Representative Democracy. The Law, the Future, common sense


and decency are ON Our Side. The PeopleUnited in exciting solidarity
are ready to BRING IT ON!, to those who corrupt, mock and trivialize
our Right to free, fair and VALID


Elections. Either-the B/C or K/E ticket OR the media is not authorized to accept


dirty elections on the people's behalf if it does not follow clean worldwide


standards. A studied, honest legal assessment shows the 2004Debacle to be


suspect, questionable, frustratingly problematic in its planning,


conduct and now-audit.


Since the CorpMedia has almost zilch credibility as an objective news


source it is the EveryDay People's duty to become and originate a


New Medium which breathes life, rarified air into the communications sphere.


DeCONtaminating the poisoned, polluted atmosphere of responsible


public discourse.Honoring the Public's right-to-know, efforts Conscientiously aimed at motivating, maturing and


moving Consensus Reality Forward-closing the Wisdom Gap.


Can't you see Boris, slyly


grinnin',(the raw exit poll data withheld inside his overcoat) smacking


his fist in his palm, threatening, "What part of, it's over, don't


you understand?" With Abu Gharib, Gitmo ethos prevalent & lurking, the shameful


media is acting much like an agressive interrogater, enforcer- foisting
a fraudulent, sham election onto the MassPsyche, and to caring,
FreeThinkers & justified Vote Defenders, akin to Psychological
torture. First they tell us that it is the most important election


in our lifetime, then Andrew Card nervously, unilaterally calls the


election, in lieu of earned merit, for his boss. The media


doesn't study it, analyize it, or do their job and in a concerted campaign,


echo in unison-GET OVER IT. (remember Hussein capture? newspapers,


websites, networks, punditz-LIKE A RAT,Like a Rat, like a rat) Who gives the orders for these negative thought-spores?


THIS indocrination, chicanery, ridicule is obvious and THE ULTIMATE fear


and hopeless-based trauma


CONDITIONING TO MANUFACTURE ALIENATION and TIMID ACCEPTANCE FOR THE


END OF DEMOCRACY.


News org's spreading thought-viruses violate the BirthRight


freedom- Cognitive Liberty and the sovereignity of individuals


freedom to think independently,


fairly, ho

Protest / Resistance
  • Facebook logo
  • Google logo
  • identi.ca logo
  • Twitter logo
  • Digg logo
  • del.icio.us logo
  • Reddit logo
  • StumbleUpon logo
  • Yahoo logo
  • Log in or register to post comments

Search form

Local News

“Family Trouble”: The 1975 Killing of Denise Hawkins and the Legacy of Deadly Force in the Rochester, NY Police Department
CBA between the City of Rochester, NY and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 1974 - 1976
CBA between the City of Rochester & the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2019 - 2024
Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded