Skip to main content
  • 50 — цена 600 грн в каталоге Ветровки ✓ Купить мужские вещи по доступной цене на Шафе , Ветровка nike air р 48 - Украина #66611078 - nike roshe run nm fb grey camo pants boys blue
  • adidas Pacer 3-Stripes Woven , Украина #151574940 , Укороченная футболка adidas — цена 260 грн в каталоге Футболки ✓ Купить женские вещи по доступной цене на Шафе
  • nike monster sb green red light hair color, Украина #142909159, elastico nike air max 90 futura valentines day, кроссовки женские найк аир макс 90 , кроссовки женьше найк эир макс — цена 2400 грн в каталоге Кроссовки ✓ Купить женские вещи по доступной цене на Шафе
  • Pratica e fresca t-shirt
  • dolce gabbana portofino lace up sneakers item
  • nike air jordan 4 white cement 2016 retro
  • nike kyrie 8 cancelled
  • air jordan 4 red urban camo custom
  • jordan kids shoes jordan 1 retro high white university blue black
  • air jordan 1 retro high og hyper royal
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • About Us
  • Watch/Listen
  • FOIL Docs
  • Editorial Policy
  • Log in
  • Publish Article

Upcoming Events

No upcoming calendar events.

Who Owns The Army?

Primary tabs

  • View
  • Devel(active tab)

Secondary tabs

  • Load(active tab)
  • Render
  • ... (Object) stdClass
    • vid (String, 4 characters ) 2261
    • uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • title (String, 18 characters ) Who Owns The Army?
    • log (String, 0 characters )
    • status (String, 1 characters ) 1
    • comment (String, 1 characters ) 2
    • promote (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • sticky (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • nid (String, 4 characters ) 2261
    • type (String, 17 characters ) drupalimc_article
    • language (String, 3 characters ) und
    • created (String, 10 characters ) 1103860552
    • changed (String, 10 characters ) 1104130788
    • tnid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • translate (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • revision_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1104130788
    • revision_uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • body (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 5 elements)
          • value (String, 6042 characters ) Are you under the assumption that the Army, Nav...
            • Are you under the assumption that the Army, Navy, Air force, and Marines, own the equipment that they use? Is the soldier who stands guard someplace in the world, under the illusion that the gun he has, belongs to him or to the military branch he is a member of? Unless he paid taxes at sometime, he cannot claim any ownership of that gun. The gun belongs to the taxpayers. <!--break--> An excerpt from the book, The Gospel Writers, at www.thegospelwriters.com Are you under the assumption that the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, own the equipment that they use? Is the soldier who stands guard, someplace in the world, under the illusion that the gun he has in his possession belongs to him or to the military branch he is a member of? Unless he paid taxes at sometime, he cannot claim any ownership of that gun. The fact is, all military equipment belongs to the people who paid money (taxes) to make the equipment. The phrase, "Property of the U.S. Army," is grossly incorrect. The truth is, the phrase should be reworded to say, "Property of the U.S. Taxpayers." I work hard to earn money, and a portion of that money goes to the purchase of military equipment. I pay taxes, and if you too pay taxes, then every piece of equipment that the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines use, belongs to you and every other taxpayer. You and I own ships, aircraft carriers, tanks, guns, bombs, missiles, jets, bombers, and an array of very high-tech gear. And, it represents billions and billions of our money. All of this military equipment does not exclusively belong to special interest groups, interests over seas, those who pay more taxes because they make more money off those of us who are forced to buy everything we need to live on from them, religious groups who complain louder or are tenaciously whiny, congress, the judicial branch, or the executive branch. "We the people," equally own every last dollar of military equipment. There is no "We-They" the people. If I want to go inspect or test out some of my military equipment, I ought to be able to do that. I should be able to walk up to anyone guarding my military property, with my W2's in hand, show them to the person who is wearing everything I bought for them, and they in turn, with a big smile on their face, should say, "Yes taxpayer (SSN), I'm glad you came to look at your military equipment today. Do you need any assistance?" And they do this quickly, and courteously, because I am the customer, the consumer of all these billions and billions of purchases in military equipment. Oh, but what if I was a spy? Well, being such an important consumer of military equipment, I would expect to be pleasantly and respectfully escorted to look at my property. If I wanted to take a tank out for a test drive, I would expect that some nice knowledgeable person would go with me and show me how (since it was my money that educated them in the art of tank driving). We are guaranteed the right to bear arms. I've chosen not to keep my arms at my house, because I don’t' have a lot of room. I keep my arms at military bases, where they can be looked after until I need them. If the person watching my property were to say to me, "For your own good or for the good of the country, I cannot let you see, inspect, or test your own property," I would say to them, "I am the country and I am smart enough to know what "my own good" is. Show me my property or I will get someone to take it away from you and give it to someone else that will. I don't remember anyone asking me if they could use my property to go bomb Iraq, do you? We have the Internet. I have an email account. Those with the desire to attach Iraq could have mass emailed all of us taxpayers, (or sent out a postcard), to all of us who own all the equipment, to see if our permission to use the equipment is granted. Those with the desire to attach Iraq can ask congress if they can send the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, to do this, because Our Constitution allows for that. However, that is just the people in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. If they want to use our military equipment, which I assume they will want, be more affective with the attack, I prefer that they ask all of us taxpayers, first. And not just steal from us and use it whenever and wherever, without permission. And last, but not least, some of the equipment I bought, does not do what the manufacturer said it could do. I want the receipt sent to me, so I can return that equipment for a refund, credit on a future purchase, or trade it for something that works. For the amount money we have spent to date, (our money), in the attack of Iraq and the re-taking of Kuwait, we could have developed the hydrogen powered car, truck, bus, train, safe fueling stations, and setup a national distribution system; thereby reducing our country's dependency on oil forever, and we would not need to continue to spend our tax dollars on Oil Companies to keep the oil flowing and for Automotive Companies to continue to make petroleum-powered vehicles. If the old industrialists want to keep serving up the same old crap to the American consumer, let them rent our military to protect their own selfish interests in petroleum products. And we will find alternates to plastic and petroleum-powered vehicles. In other words, we will progress and leave that portion of the Ruling Class in the dusk choking on their own greed. Or, they can sell all their oil manufacturing, transport, and distribution assets, and go into the hydrogen-powered vehicle making business. I have all the confidence in the world, that this segment of the Ruling Class, who are certainly not stupid people, will be able to make a decent living, like the rest of us, in this new business too (less a few company perks, campaign donations, and their obscene political clout). What do you think? Suggested Readings Guns, Germs, and Steel by Pulitzer Prize Winning Author Jared Diamond, Ph.D Liberating The Caged Human Animal by Dr. Peter Hercules M.D.
          • summary (NULL)
          • format (String, 9 characters ) full_html
          • safe_value (String, 6168 characters ) <p>Are you under the assumption that the Army, ...
            • <p>Are you under the assumption that the Army, Navy, Air force, and Marines, own the equipment that they use? Is the soldier who stands guard someplace in the world, under the illusion that the gun he has, belongs to him or to the military branch he is a member of? Unless he paid taxes at sometime, he cannot claim any ownership of that gun. The gun belongs to the taxpayers.</p> <!--break--><p>An excerpt from the book, The Gospel Writers, at <a href="http://www.thegospelwriters.com">www.thegospelwriters.com</a></p> <p>Are you under the assumption that the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, own the equipment that they use? Is the soldier who stands guard, someplace in the world, under the illusion that the gun he has in his possession belongs to him or to the military branch he is a member of? Unless he paid taxes at sometime, he cannot claim any ownership of that gun. The fact is, all military equipment belongs to the people who paid money (taxes) to make the equipment. The phrase, "Property of the U.S. Army," is grossly incorrect. The truth is, the phrase should be reworded to say, "Property of the U.S. Taxpayers."</p> <p>I work hard to earn money, and a portion of that money goes to the purchase of military equipment. I pay taxes, and if you too pay taxes, then every piece of equipment that the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines use, belongs to you and every other taxpayer. You and I own ships, aircraft carriers, tanks, guns, bombs, missiles, jets, bombers, and an array of very high-tech gear. And, it represents billions and billions of our money. </p> <p>All of this military equipment does not exclusively belong to special interest groups, interests over seas, those who pay more taxes because they make more money off those of us who are forced to buy everything we need to live on from them, religious groups who complain louder or are tenaciously whiny, congress, the judicial branch, or the executive branch. "We the people," equally own every last dollar of military equipment. There is no "We-They" the people.</p> <p>If I want to go inspect or test out some of my military equipment, I ought to be able to do that. I should be able to walk up to anyone guarding my military property, with my W2's in hand, show them to the person who is wearing everything I bought for them, and they in turn, with a big smile on their face, should say, "Yes taxpayer (SSN), I'm glad you came to look at your military equipment today. Do you need any assistance?" And they do this quickly, and courteously, because I am the customer, the consumer of all these billions and billions of purchases in military equipment.</p> <p>Oh, but what if I was a spy? Well, being such an important consumer of military equipment, I would expect to be pleasantly and respectfully escorted to look at my property. If I wanted to take a tank out for a test drive, I would expect that some nice knowledgeable person would go with me and show me how (since it was my money that educated them in the art of tank driving). We are guaranteed the right to bear arms. I've chosen not to keep my arms at my house, because I don’t' have a lot of room. I keep my arms at military bases, where they can be looked after until I need them. If the person watching my property were to say to me, "For your own good or for the good of the country, I cannot let you see, inspect, or test your own property," I would say to them, "I am the country and I am smart enough to know what "my own good" is. Show me my property or I will get someone to take it away from you and give it to someone else that will.</p> <p>I don't remember anyone asking me if they could use my property to go bomb Iraq, do you? We have the Internet. I have an email account. Those with the desire to attach Iraq could have mass emailed all of us taxpayers, (or sent out a postcard), to all of us who own all the equipment, to see if our permission to use the equipment is granted. Those with the desire to attach Iraq can ask congress if they can send the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, to do this, because Our Constitution allows for that. However, that is just the people in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. If they want to use our military equipment, which I assume they will want, be more affective with the attack, I prefer that they ask all of us taxpayers, first. And not just steal from us and use it whenever and wherever, without permission. </p> <p>And last, but not least, some of the equipment I bought, does not do what the manufacturer said it could do. I want the receipt sent to me, so I can return that equipment for a refund, credit on a future purchase, or trade it for something that works.</p> <p>For the amount money we have spent to date, (our money), in the attack of Iraq and the re-taking of Kuwait, we could have developed the hydrogen powered car, truck, bus, train, safe fueling stations, and setup a national distribution system; thereby reducing our country's dependency on oil forever, and we would not need to continue to spend our tax dollars on Oil Companies to keep the oil flowing and for Automotive Companies to continue to make petroleum-powered vehicles. If the old industrialists want to keep serving up the same old crap to the American consumer, let them rent our military to protect their own selfish interests in petroleum products. And we will find alternates to plastic and petroleum-powered vehicles. In other words, we will progress and leave that portion of the Ruling Class in the dusk choking on their own greed. Or, they can sell all their oil manufacturing, transport, and distribution assets, and go into the hydrogen-powered vehicle making business. I have all the confidence in the world, that this segment of the Ruling Class, who are certainly not stupid people, will be able to make a decent living, like the rest of us, in this new business too (less a few company perks, campaign donations, and their obscene political clout). What do you think?</p> <p>Suggested Readings<br /> Guns, Germs, and Steel by Pulitzer Prize Winning Author Jared Diamond, Ph.D<br /> Liberating The Caged Human Animal by Dr. Peter Hercules M.D.</p>
          • safe_summary (String, 0 characters )
    • field_drupalimc_categories (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • tid (String, 1 characters ) 9
    • field_drupalimc_local_interest (Array, 1 element)
      • und (Array, 1 element)
        • 0 (Array, 1 element)
          • value (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • field_drupalimc_migrated_images (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_gallery (Array, 0 elements)
    • field_drupalimc_author (Array, 0 elements)
    • rdf_mapping (Array, 9 elements)
      • rdftype (Array, 2 elements)
        • 0 (String, 9 characters ) sioc:Item
        • 1 (String, 13 characters ) foaf:Document
      • title (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 8 characters ) dc:title
      • created (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 2 elements)
          • 0 (String, 7 characters ) dc:date
          • 1 (String, 10 characters ) dc:created
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • changed (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 11 characters ) dc:modified
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
      • body (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 15 characters ) content:encoded
      • uid (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:has_creator
        • type (String, 3 characters ) rel
      • name (Array, 1 element)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 9 characters ) foaf:name
      • comment_count (Array, 2 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 16 characters ) sioc:num_replies
        • datatype (String, 11 characters ) xsd:integer
      • last_activity (Array, 3 elements)
        • predicates (Array, 1 element)
          • 0 (String, 23 characters ) sioc:last_activity_date
        • datatype (String, 12 characters ) xsd:dateTime
        • callback (String, 12 characters ) date_iso8601 | (Callback) date_iso8601();
    • signature (String, 0 characters )
    • spaminess (Float) 0
    • cid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • last_comment_timestamp (String, 10 characters ) 1328067715
    • last_comment_name (NULL)
    • last_comment_uid (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • comment_count (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • name (String, 0 characters )
    • picture (String, 1 characters ) 0
    • data (NULL)
  • Krumo version 0.2.1a
    | http://krumo.sourceforge.net
    Called from /home/members/rochindymedia/sites/rochester.indymedia.org/web/includes/menu.inc, line 527  

Search form

Local News

“Family Trouble”: The 1975 Killing of Denise Hawkins and the Legacy of Deadly Force in the Rochester, NY Police Department
CBA between the City of Rochester, NY and the Rochester Police Locust Club, 1974 - 1976
CBA between the City of Rochester & the Rochester Police Locust Club, 2019 - 2024
Did District Attorney Sandra Doorley Violate Ethics Guidelines While Attending a Local Republican Fundraiser in May?
Jim Goodman - Sleeper Cell for the Revolution!
The Press as Powdered Donut with Blue Badge in the Middle
Blueprint for Engagement: Evaluating Police / Community Relations Final Report (2017)
The Police-Civilian Foot Patrol: An Evaluation of the PAC-TAC Experiemnt in Rochester, New York (June 1975)
Police Killing of Denise Hawkins (1975)
Complaint Investigation Committee Legislation (1977)
Race Rebellion of July 1964
Selections Regarding the Police Advisory Board (1963-1970)
Prelude to the Police Advisory Board
A.C. White (January 26, 1963)
Police Raid on Black Muslim Religious Service (January 6, 1963)
Rufus Fairwell (August 12, 1962)
Incarcerated Worker sheds light on Prison Labor Conditions during Pandemic
Police and Political Commentary
BWC video indicates Mark Gaskill was holding his phone as police shouted "gun"
How the NY Attorney General's defended the police who killed Daniel Prude

Recent Comments

Any status on FOIL request?
Media's Goebbels
Related
Related
USA as NAZI criminals
oops
PS
A message of Truth from Geral
Fyi
See related data...

Syndication

  • Feature Stories
  • Local News

Account Creation Policy Change

Rochester Indymedia is now requiring editor approval for account creation.

We came to this decision after we had repeated spam posted to our website that caused difficulty with the website's functioning.  We will still have open publishing and keep our site as nonrestrictive and accessible as possible.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.  As before, we will continue to be Rochester's grassroots news and education site.  Thank you for your continued support and remember, "Don't hate the media, be the media!"

Editorial Meeting Times / Locations

The Rochester Independent Media Center (R-IMC) is no longer meeting regularly.
We will set up meetings by necessity and appointment. Please contact us at rochesterindymedia@rocus.org.
Our home is still the Flying Squirrel Community Space at 285 Clarissa St. Occasionally, we hold meetings at RCTV located at 21 Gorham Street.

Global IMC Network

To be downloaded