October 18, 2009 - On Friday, October 16, 2009, (14th anniversary of the historic Million Man March and 150th anniversary of John Brown's insurrection at Harpers Ferry, WV) AARM members and supporters delivered approximately 700 signatures of Rochester city residents to Federal Prosecuting Attorney Douglas E. Gregory's extravagant home, located in one of Penfield, New York's plushest neighborhoods (24 Dundas Road) --- that is, neighborhoods where houses routinely cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. The petitions denounced the current racist and absurd use of the RICO statute in a case against 24 poor African-American men and women from one of Rochester, New York's poorest neighborhoods (located in the so-called Northeast Crescent).
Why didn't you read, hear, or see this reported by the mainstream media? One major reason why is because, roughly nine months after AARM reached out to all major media in Rochester and engaged them in dialogue and interactions with communities of color --- in attempts to help them regain sight (if indeed they ever had it) relative to the errors of their ways concerning their institutional role in helping to perpetuate individual and institutionalized racism --- they have seemingly slipped back into their comfortable niche of unofficial, yet clear agents as the collective mouth-piece of the wealthy and well-to-do. As it relates to the mainstream media reporting on anything other than (for the most part) shootings, murders, and other types of violence within communities of color, we are now back to ground-zero.
If it was not so sad and sick, it would be ironic that mere hours before AARM delivered the petition to Gregory's home, 15-year-old Tyquan Rivera stood in a courtroom in Rochester, NY where he was sentenced to the maximum prison term allowed under law --- for having been found guilty of shooting a Rochester police officer. And of course, all mainstream media outlets were there. Not only were they present, which was to be expected, but symbolically, they were operating like a pack of blood-thirsty, rabid wolves. The following quote is but a small example of the extraordinary measures taken by representatives of mainstream media institutions --- in order to ensure that they would be able to provide blow-by-blow coverage of that which some have referred to as a "miscarriage and mockery of justice, and legal-lynching" of young Tyquan Rivera: "Valentino ruled yesterday that the Democrat and Chronicle will be allowed to take still photographs throughout the entire sentencing. One media representative will be allowed to shoot video of the sentencing. The video will be shared by all media outlets that made formal requests to Valentino prior to yesterday's hearing. Laptop computers will also be allowed during the sentencing. Starting at 9:30 a.m., today you can view a combination of live video and a live blog on our live video page. To view the live blog only, you can click on our live blog page."
Others insist that the only way in which the Rivera situation could even come close to resembling true justice is if Rochester Police Department officer Kevin Mack is dismissed from his position with the RPD, arrested, and charged with first-degree assault for allegedly "beating the crap out of Tyquan --- shortly before the misguided youth made a foolish decision --- in an attempt to get even with officer Mack." It is most interesting that the local, black-owned, radio station WDKX has a recording, in which a man called into a talk show --- after the shooting took place --- to say that there is concrete evidence that officer Mack is in fact guilty of beating the crap out of Tyquan just before the shooting took place. Of course, Mack's alleged brutality against Tyquan does not represent a legitimate reason or excuse to pick up a weapon, but the Rochester Police Department, the broader Rochester community, and particularly mainstream media, are (to say the least) hypocritical for not pursuing an investigation of Mack's alleged brutality against Tyquan. With regard to Mack, Tyquan and, the shooting, the following perspective, which was reported in the Democrat and Chronicle is interesting to say the very least: "Rivera was convicted Sep. 4 of attempted second-degree murder and first-degree assault following a four-day trial. He was accused of taking a 22-caliber rifle and aiming it at Officer Kevin Mack, with whom he had had a confrontation moments earlier." "Confrontation"? Right.
Even though AARM issued a press release on October 16th, which was sent to all local media, most were too busy (all day and half of the night) covering the Tyquan Rivera case and other such tragic situations to even consider showing up at Douglas E. Gregory's estate.
We predict that the day will come when mainstream media institutions will necessarily rethink their supposed "fair and objective" journalistic roles, if for no other reason, because they will need to --- in order to regain their dwindling market-share relative to readership, listenership and viewership --- as more and more people turn to non-traditional, non-mainstream, and independent sources such as Indymedia, Minority Reporter, Challenger, and Smugtown Beacon for their NEWS.
Please click on the link below to see a video of AARM members and supporters --- delivering the above-referenced petition to the extravagant home and plush neighborhood in which Federal Prosecutor Douglas E. Gregory resides.
indytv.blip.tv/file/2734334/
Comments
Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
We can't control the mainstream media. That's why IndyMedia exists. Concentrate on providing the alternative, not on whining about why we have to provide the alternative. The story, in this case, is not that there was no mainstream coverage (the story is the delivery of the petition), so the headline should not be about the mainstream coverage.
I'm not against articles that specifically discuss the biases of the for-profit media outlets. What I'm saying is that all articles should stay focused. Pick a story and cover it, and don't rehash unreferenced statements in the middle about the "collective mouth-piece". (BTW, mouthpiece is a word, you don't have to hyphenate it.)
Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
A Report To The Community
By: Howard J Eagle
October 22, 2009 - As a follow-up to the news-story below, I thought the community would be interested in knowing that on Monday afternoon, October 19, 2009 --- I joined the list of U.S. citizens who have received uninvited, unexplainable and unwelcomed visits to their homes by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI).
When the door bell rang, I opened the door, and before agent Rick Rooney from the Buffalo,NY Office (cell phone:716-481-9998 and desk phone: 716-551-3925) could flip his wallet open --- to show me his official identification (the way they do on t.v.) --- I said "FBI, right?" I had been expecting them --- because less than an hour earlier --- I had received a phone call from someone at an address where I haven't lived for over ten (10) years, informing me that "the FBI is looking for you." My half-joking response was --- "they are not looking for me as hard as I am looking for them." Since they had left their names at my former address, my plan was to go to the State Street Federal Building and ask for them by name, but as I stated previously, before I could do so, the door bell rang.
When I opened the door and saw two clean-cut, white men dressed in white shirts and ties (with concealed side-arms) --- I figured who else could this possibly be --- except the FBI. Agent Rooney was accompanied by Agent Leonard Opanashuk from the Rochester, NY Office (phone: 546-2220, ext. 127). Oh, with regard to the concealed side-arms, at one point agent Opanashuk's jacket slipped open, and I was able to get a peek. It appeared that his weapon was hanging from a shoulder holster (like on t.v.). In hind sight, I had wondered if he intentionally displayed the weapon as some sort of intimidation tactic, but that's probably not the case. I was probably just paranoid. If it is the case, it didn't work. I also didn't think about the fact (until later) that as we (me and the FBI Agents) stood in the doorway to my dining room, chit-chatting (as a backdrop) --- a nicely-framed painting of Malcolm X (one of Malcolm's most radical images), hung on the dining room wall. I wondered later, what they thought of the painting. Also, as I continued to reflect on the situation --- I was reminded of information in Malcolm's autobiography, in which he discussed being visited by the FBI numerous times. I just smiled to myself, and said wow --- I'm in good company.
Before Agent Rooney even opened his mouth, I knew that their uninvited, unexplainable and unwelcomed visit was connected to the fact that three days earlier, on October 16, 2009 (along with six other members and/or supporters of Activists Against Racism Movement,AARM) I had, as explained in the news article below, delivered a Petition to the plush, Penfield, NY neighborhood and home of Federal Prosecuting Attorney Douglas E. Gregory. There is no other possible reason why the FBI would just drop by my home unexpectedly. Agent Rooney said they "felt bad" about just dropping by, but he explained that they were concerned about Gregory, and that they wanted to make sure that his safety was not in jeopardy -- because of him doing his job. So, I asked, "exactly what are you saying or implying"? His response was that our organization has the right to protest, but going to Gregory's home "might be stepping over the line." Then, he went on to say that he can't tell us not to go there, but he explained that he was concerned because our visit intimidated Gregory's wife and children, and that he didn't think they should be drawn into this. After assuring him of the fact that AARM members and supporters have no desire or intent to intimidate women, children or anyone else --- I informed the Agents that we are more concerned about the women, children and others who live on Garson, Parsells, Webster Avenues, etc... being intimidated by the FBI, RPD, Monroe County Sheriff's Department and New York State Police --- swooping down on their communities --- like storm troopers. Of course the latter comment drew dead silence.
Agent Opanashuk asserted that one concern is the possibility that others will see Gregory's address and home publicized on websites, and might want to do harm to him. My response to him was and is that, first, Mr. Gregory's address is public information, which he acknowledged, and secondly AARM obviously will not take responsibility for any actions taken by persons who are not affiliated with our organization.
My wife (whom I had been smart enough to call into the room --- before I even opened the door --- to witness the conversation, and who had been just standing there listening, up to this point) asked a couple of very critical questions. She wanted to know whether or not the Agents had visited any other participating-activist(s) home(s). Their answer was "no." Then, of course, the next logical question was --- how did you pick Howard? There response to the latter question was libelous and illogical. They claimed that they looked at AARM's website, and apparently clicked on the "About Us" section --- and, according to them, my photo was the first one that popped up. Go do the website-experiment for yourself, and see what happens: aarm.rocus.org.
At this point I gave the Agents my cell number (752-1426), as if --- if they had really wanted to --- the FBI couldn't have gotten my cell number, home number, and any other number that might be assigned to me, but my point was, and I told them as much, if they ever need to contact me in the future --- call first (before coming to my home). The sanctity of my home is as precious to me --- as Douglas Gregory's is to him, or Agents Rooney and Opanashuk's are to them.
The bottom line is that the FBI came calling, but should not again (at least not prior to phoning), and the Struggle continues...
Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Keep up the struggle!
Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Re: Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Re: Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
May Rochester IMC feature your FBI account?
Thank you so much for posting it.
Ted-
Re: Mainstream Media Absent as Activists Against Racism Movement Delivers 700 Signatures
The effect of 700 signatures upon the problems of racism in this country is surely incalculable. I know that the mere presence of, the existence, of these 700 signatures strikes fear into the hearts of unrepentant racists everywhere, and where possible, changes attitudes and brings people together in racial harmony.
Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou.