Rochester IMC : http://rochester.indymedia.org
Publish Your News

News :: Health Care

Flu shots are virtually worthless, says new British Medical Journal analysis

more proof we are being scammed!
Flu shots are virtually worthless, says new British Medical Journal analysis
by Jessica Fraser

(NaturalNews) Flu vaccines are largely ineffective in the populations for which they are most highly recommended, according to a new study published in the Oct. 28 issue of the British Medical Journal.
Dr. Tom Jefferson, coordinator of the Cochrane Vaccines Field in Rome, Italy, conducted an extensive review of previous studies on the effectiveness of inactivated [dead virus] flu vaccines on hospital admissions, death rates and time off work.
"We've got an exaggerated expectation of what vaccines can actually do," Jefferson said. "I'm hoping American and European taxpayers will be alerted and start asking questions."
Most developed and developing countries have influenza vaccination programs that are believed to help reduce the number of flu deaths and hospitalizations. United States health authorities currently recommend flu vaccine shots for most Americans -- children 6 to 23 months; kids 23 months to 5 years old; those 50 and older; people with chronic health conditions such as diabetes, asthma, HIV or heart disease; health-care professionals and caregivers; and anyone with household contact of high-risk individuals, such as stay-home mothers with young children.
Jefferson notes that recommendations for flu vaccines have significantly increased in recent years -- a move he says may not be justified.
"I looked at the evidence described by systematic reviews and confronted it with policy and I found that there is a massive gap," he said. "Almost none of the benefits that these policy documents list are actually given by inactivated vaccines or, if they are, they are given in slighter measure."
Consumer health advocate Mike Adams, author of "Conquering the Common Cold," called flu vaccine shots "one of the greatest medical cons perpetrated on the populations of the world," and questioned new U.S. policies pushing the vaccines on young children and expectant mothers.
"Flu shots only prevent colds in about 1 percent of people who get them, making them 99 percent useless," Adams said. "They also inject unhealthy substances such as mercury preservatives directly into tissues, poisoning the patient with a chemical burden that accumulates with each flu shot."
###
www.naturalnews.com/020912.html
www.naturalnews.com/022400.html Vaccines Exposed: A Hidden Crime Against Our Children
 
 

Add a new comment
Title
Author Anonymous Poster
  Create a new account
Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

British Medical Journal supports flu shots.

British Medical journal supports flu vaccines

Posted by check and see on Thursday, May 8th at 2:41 PM

1: Related Articles, LinksStafford N.

Germans urged to have flu vaccination as supplies reach all time high.
BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):298-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 18258955 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]2: Related Articles, LinksGlusker A.

World Health Assembly debates sharing of bird flu viruses for vaccines.
BMJ. 2007 Jun 2;334(7604):1134. No abstract available.
PMID: 17540932 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]3: Related Articles, LinksCoker R.

UK preparedness for pandemic influenza.
BMJ. 2007 May 12;334(7601):965-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 17493986 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]4: Related Articles, LinksZarocostas J.

Nations signal support for WHO to stockpile H5N1 vaccine.
BMJ. 2007 May 5;334(7600):925. No abstract available.
PMID: 17478826 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]5: Related Articles, LinksMayor S.

People exposed to H5N1 in English turkey outbreak get antiviral and vaccination.
BMJ. 2007 Feb 10;334(7588):275. No abstract available.
PMID: 17289699 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]6: Related Articles, LinksZarocostas J.

New WHO chief urges member states to step up efforts for flu pandemic.
BMJ. 2007 Jan 13;334(7584):61. No abstract available.


Now, if you had read the actual journal, you'd know that the whole issue was a pro and con discussion of vaacinnes. But giving your repost a misleading title and deleting a full 50 % of the contents, you've just lied by ommission. Feel good,now?
 

Account Login

Ongoing Local Events

Critical Mass
Last Friday of the Month
6:00pm

Indy TV
Monday 6:30pm
Thursday 8:30pm
RCTV - Cable Channel 15

Democracy Now!
Weeknights 8:00-9:00pm
WROC - 950 AM

Media Centers

Syndication feeds

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software