Excellent! Thanks for doing this. I'm looking forward to the rest of the series.

The most laughably incomplete, muddled, pretentious, and obfuscatory bullshit presentation about anarchism I have ever witnessed. In a time where every shitbag middle-class pseudo-intellectual college student is jumping on the bandwagon and appropriating what was once a bold and broad populist working-class movement as a 'lifestyle' choice.

Anarchism is an instrument of CLASS WAR. So you can't really expect anything decent or intelligent or relevant to be said about it by a couple of obvious bourgeois. A pompous and muddled professor form a rich suburb of new york and a smug and self-righteous 'activist' (read: blowhard, cop, priest) that says absolutely nothing about the real roots and the real purpose of the anarchist movement. A pitiably self-indulgent joke complete with smug Amy Goodman wannabee presenter who can't even steer an interview worth a damn. But she's barefoot! Wow! Like, radical, dude!

What a fucking joke.

wooooah gods! look out folks! it's the ANARCHIST POLICE! What am I going to do? Should I listen to the laughably incomplete, muddled, pretentious, and obfuscatory bullshit from anon? Or make my own decision? Who are you, a cop? Can you define "class war" for me? I know folks love buzz words…but seriously… joke's on you with your hostility and lack of action except of course the punching of keys instead of creating what you want to see….

So: Pittsford, or Brighton? Is your daddy a doctor or a lawyer?

Do you really need someone to define 'Class War' for you, and yet call yourself an anarchist?

There's no substance in this slam. Its obvious that you watched the show for a few minutes just to garner some shallow judgments so you could go on a spew session. You come off as a really arrogant, holier than thou, drive-by, anonymous sort of internet troll.

As in your former posts, I don't think you're interested in real debate. I assume that you were just hoping Indymedia would hide this comment, then you'd have some more fuel to feel really self righteous and send more insults out into the ether.

Good Luck with your great organizing strategy.

'So: Pittsford, or Brighton? Is your daddy a doctor or a lawyer?'

If the 'ant-anti' jagoff (woah jeez, the gov't is soooo scared of your ass) can answer this question, then I swear god's honest I'll be nice and merciful with all you spoiled pseudo-intellectual liberal capitalists in training.

As far as organizing , constructive activity, and strategy are concerned, I have more going than you could possibly imagine or even understand. The thing is....I am not interested in the opinions of the bourgeouisie. I am interested in their destruction.

It doesn matter a flying fuck if a bunch of shitbag suburban bred hipsters decide they want to 'accesorize' anarchist. Your opinion means nothing.

What matters is a WORKING CLASS united in solidarity against capital - and for the cooperative commonwealth.

Revolution is, strictly speaking, none of your fucking business.

Go read some Kropotkin, some Malatesta, take two, and call me in the morning. That's the closest you are gonna come.

So have you hypocrites appointed a full-time, real time censor?

anyone who attacks the 'leftist' 'liberal' bourgeousie intelligentsia gets cut, huh?

no surprises here

Whoa!! Can you say, 'psychological projection?'

We know you don't know Dean-Kawamura, becuse he's one of the most even-tempered, fair, and dedicated anti-authoritarian activists in our area. And you totally don't know Zupelli either. She's way better than Goodman, because she doesn't get lecture honorariums, awards, or a salary, and she's totally fearless.

This kind of intense commentary usually means that folks like Dean-Kawamura and Zupelli are getting somewhere with their work.

Sorry I don't know much about Dr. White, but the proto-anarchist thinkers he tells us about, like Thoreau, provided the DNA of the later movements you describe. So your purist working-class front could not have existed without the kind of bourgeois educated thinkers you vilify. I guess the question here is, who appropriated whose thought first?

Not sure if there are two trolls writing here, but I think you catch my meaning.

As I said, earlier, I'm very much looking forward to the rest of the series on 'Anarchism 101!'